[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: back to directory dependencies
From: |
Baurzhan Ismagulov |
Subject: |
Re: back to directory dependencies |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:23:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Hello Ralf,
thanks for your prompt answer!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Put
> AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS([d1 d2 l1 l2 src1 src2])
> in toplevel configure.ac and
> SUBDIRS = d1 d2 l1 l2 src1 src2
> in toplevel Makefile.am, in the order in which you want them configured
> resp. built.
I've thought about SUBDIRS, but didn't know how I do AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS.
But I have another problem with SUBDIRS. As I mentioned in the previous
thread, specifying -j starts building of l1 and src1 in parallel. l1
lasts longer, and src1 fails due to missing l1. So I think I really need
dependencies rather than sequence. What do you think?
With kind regards,
Baurzhan.
- back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies,
Baurzhan Ismagulov <=
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/08
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/08
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/10
Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/28