[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro? |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:11:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.7.4 (Linux/3.1.10-1.9-desktop; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> it might make sense to try to do it in a more Autoconfish way.
The reason why we do this with explicit #ifs that test for a compiler
brand, not in an "Autoconfish way", is that we use the result in .h
files that should be installable and, after installation, used by a
potentially different compiler. Simon's and my packages use this feature.
The best way to get this done correctly are cascades of explicit #ifs.
Bruno
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, (continued)
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Vincent Lefevre, 2012/04/26
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Eric Blake, 2012/04/26
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Vincent Lefevre, 2012/04/26
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Eric Blake, 2012/04/26
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Vincent Lefevre, 2012/04/26
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Nick Bowler, 2012/04/26
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Vincent Lefevre, 2012/04/27
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Russ Allbery, 2012/04/26
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Vincent Lefevre, 2012/04/27
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Paul Eggert, 2012/04/28
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Vincent Lefevre, 2012/04/29
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Bruno Haible, 2012/04/29
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Paul Eggert, 2012/04/29
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Bruno Haible, 2012/04/29
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Paul Eggert, 2012/04/29
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Bruno Haible, 2012/04/29
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Vincent Lefevre, 2012/04/29
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Paul Eggert, 2012/04/29
- Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?, Bruno Haible, 2012/04/29