[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open'
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open' |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:01:39 +0200 |
Eric Blake wrote:
...
>> If anything, this issue shows that the Automake::XFile module (and
>> other similar modules as well) should live in their own git
>> repository, which both Autoconf and Automake should use as a
>> submodule -- and which (for $DEITY's sake!), should be unit-tested.
>> Any volunteer?
>
> Alas, my perl-fu is weak enough that I'm not sure how good my
> unit-testing attempts would be. But moving the files to a common
> repository seems doable (how about gnulib?).
Fine with me.
- [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open', Eric Blake, 2012/04/24
- Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open', Russ Allbery, 2012/04/24
- Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open', Eric Blake, 2012/04/24
- Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open', Stefano Lattarini, 2012/04/24
- Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open', Eric Blake, 2012/04/24
- Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open', Stefano Lattarini, 2012/04/26
- Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open', Eric Blake, 2012/04/26
- Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open', Stefano Lattarini, 2012/04/26
- Re: [FYI] {master} refactor: use modern semantics of 'open',
Jim Meyering <=