[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Assinine mailer address mangling (was: AC_DEFINE problem)
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: Assinine mailer address mangling (was: AC_DEFINE problem) |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:18:39 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Keith Marshall wrote:
> On Friday 28 April 2006 5:07 pm, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > [ Your mailer has very amusing ways of messing with addresses. :) ]
>
> That's because you lot wouldn't listen, when I suggested that the
> "Reply-To" header should be set to direct replies, first and foremost, to
> the list!
Let's not start up the discussion again. It gets discussed often
enough already.
> I'm only following *your* instructions, and using "Reply to all";
> that means you all get to see the effect of Lotus Notes in all its
> gory nastiness!
That does not change the very humorous way that your mailer modifies
mail addresses. :-)
> (And please don't blame me for the choice of Lotus Notes as my mailer;
> that choice has been imposed on me, by corporate policy).
There are many places to get free mail accounts. Perhaps that would
work better for you?
Bob
- Fwd: AC_DEFINE problem, ericdan, 2006/04/28
- Re: AC_DEFINE problem, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/28
- Re: AC_DEFINE problem, ericdan, 2006/04/28
- Re: AC_DEFINE problem, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/28
- Re: AC_DEFINE problem, Peter Breitenlohner, 2006/04/28
- Re: AC_DEFINE problem, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/28
- Re: AC_DEFINE problem, Keith MARSHALL, 2006/04/28
- Re: AC_DEFINE problem, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/28
- Assinine mailer address mangling (was: AC_DEFINE problem), Keith Marshall, 2006/04/29
- Re: Assinine mailer address mangling (was: AC_DEFINE problem),
Bob Proulx <=