Re: autoconf will accept a nonexistent compiler as the second one checked

[Stepan Kasal]

Hello,

On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 05:02:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:15:34PM CET:
> > Well, I think in this case some more sanity checks are justified

yes, you are right, we should do the check ``whether FOO compiler works''
again for each language.

I prepared the following patch.  (Be sure to update your CVS checkout
before applying it.)

Have a nice fortnight,
        Stepan

autoconf-20060321-exeext2.patch
Description: Text document