[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive
From: |
Braden McDaniel |
Subject: |
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:44:05 -0500 |
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 16:15 +0100, Peter Simons wrote:
[snip]
> For convenience:
>
> The original submitter can still use free text as long as it
> does contain an ISO-like date string. The "axlint" tool will
> pick that date out and canonize the @version tag. Thus, it
> is perfectly okay to submit a macro with a version tag like
> this one:
>
> @version $Id: foo.m4,v 1.2 2004/02/15 10:09:31 bar Exp $
>
> It will come out:
>
> @version 2004-02-15
I can go along with including a date in @version; but I don't think it's
a good idea for the archive to be stripping a release version number
that submitters may include as well.
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail: <address@hidden>
<http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <address@hidden>
- Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/24
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive,
Braden McDaniel <=
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/24
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/24
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/24
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Tom Howard, 2005/01/24
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/24
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Tom Howard, 2005/01/24
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/25
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/26