lwip-users archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ hansattersjo: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lwip-users] Re connect HTTP (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 02:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Maybe I'm confused but I think this is both a forum and a mailing list linked together. If you open http://old.nabble.com/forum/Reply.jtp?post=34321624 you will see this thread and messages. I don't
/archive/html/lwip-users/2012-08/msg00096.html (7,949 bytes)

2. Re: [lwip-users] Re connect HTTP (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
This is really a question to Simon Goldschmidt. When you reply to a post you always show the first part of the other persons email address as a quote. When other people answer you just see the userna
/archive/html/lwip-users/2012-08/msg00093.html (11,024 bytes)

3. Re: [lwip-users] Re connect HTTP (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 05:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
I do have this code before the reconnect. It is probably relevant // // Avoid repeated connect // if(pState->eTCPState == STATE_TCP_CONNECTING) return; Am I in the wrong context for the stellaris por
/archive/html/lwip-users/2012-08/msg00085.html (9,797 bytes)

4. Re: [lwip-users] Linkedin - Networking (attention off topic) (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
I still can't get this to work. I open a "telnet like" raw connection to a server on port 80 and send a string. It works but after 10 seconds the server shuts down the connection. The telnetReceive d
/archive/html/lwip-users/2012-08/msg00066.html (9,180 bytes)

5. Re: [lwip-users] Re opening LWIP for new HTTP message (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 07:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
It was quite some time I modified this code and now I had to update it again. You are right, I was wrong! The tcp_write / tcp_output are called from TelnetHandler which is called from lwIPHostTimerHa
/archive/html/lwip-users/2012-08/msg00047.html (7,676 bytes)

6. Re: [lwip-users] Re opening LWIP for new HTTP message (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 06:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Of course not what? I had at least 3 questions. I do understand that the LWIP stack is not reentrant but the Stellaris code is using tcp_write and tcp_output from the serial interrupt and it is even
/archive/html/lwip-users/2012-08/msg00043.html (7,361 bytes)

7. Re: [lwip-users] Re opening LWIP for new HTTP message (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 06:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
As I tried to mention before, only the serial receive routine has currently the knowledge of when a complete serial message is recevied and it than uses tcp_write and tcp_output to send out the messa
/archive/html/lwip-users/2012-08/msg00041.html (8,516 bytes)

8. Re: [lwip-users] Re opening LWIP for new HTTP message (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 02:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Connection didn't open and no tcp output, nothing visible in Wireshark. OK, the open is a non-blocking command so it might take a "certain" amount of time for it to open. But it doesn't feel right to
/archive/html/lwip-users/2012-08/msg00038.html (7,273 bytes)

9. [lwip-users] Re opening LWIP for new HTTP message (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 04:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
I am using LWIP 1.3.2 and software based on the Stellaris ser2enet (Cortex M3) example. It runs a web server for configuration plus a simple http client based on the telnet client. All dedicated teln
/archive/html/lwip-users/2012-08/msg00032.html (7,073 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu