Greetings! Yes, and thanks! (hopefully this is just a one line patch to the axiom sources somewhere. Would be great to finish the test build with 2.7.0 ...) GCL_ANSI=t gclcvs GCL (GNU Common Lisp) 2.
Hello, Le mardi 03 juillet 2007 à 15:36 -0400, Camm Maguire a écrit : [...] Yes, but clisp i i i i i i i ooooo o ooooooo ooooo ooooo I I I I I I I 8 8 8 8 8 o 8 8 I \ `+' / I 8 8 8 8 8 8 \ `-+-' /
Greetings! I am prepared to backport the clisp-style directory/truename behavior, but this breaks current axiom, and I do not want to leave the project even temporarily without a gcl to build it. Ple
I am affraid that wh-sandbox needs paths with slashes: /.../hyper.spad The compile command is careful to overwrite the result only _after_ successful complilation. In particular the compilation prope
Has anyone been able to run Martin's code in http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/SandBoxHyperDocReplacement While trying to test this on the latest wh-sandbox and build-improvements I got into some issue
Quoting Ralf Hemmecke <address@hidden>: ... But aldor/spad allows to modify the domain. Here some piece of code which even uses this in the Axiom algebra library: IntegerCombinatoricFunctions(I:Integ
Bill Page wrote: On the other hand Python does directly support building classes at run time while domains and categories can only be defined at compile-time in Axiom. Could you elaborate on this (o
I belive that Gold really has the same problems. To tigger rarely occuring bugs one have to vary parameters. Since Gold is essentially frozen there is probably not enough variation to see such bugs d
Oh dear. So, why doesn't this happen with "GoldenAxiom"? Is the new build procedure more sensitive to sloppy programming bugs? Well, meanwhile I was able to build most of axiom by building and instal