axiom-developer archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ erlib: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

41. RE: [Axiom-developer] My second compile command. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:53:37 -0500
Now would be a good time to submit one ... :) http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/IssueTracker#addissue This might be due to a change in the underlying lisp semantics for PROBE-FILE and TRUENAME that wer
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-02/msg00219.html (7,191 bytes)

42. Re: [Axiom-developer] My second compile command. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:50:11 -0500
I compile frequently and have never seen this message. t
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-02/msg00216.html (6,676 bytes)

43. Re: [Axiom-developer] My second compile command. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 16 Feb 2006 09:44:37 +0100
Since I modify spad code quite a lot, I know this message well. I didn't get round to write a bug report, though. It happens always when a compile succeeds and you want to compile a second time (sinc
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-02/msg00209.html (6,655 bytes)

44. [Axiom-developer] My second compile command. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 15 Feb 2006 14:50:39 +0100
Hello, I begin to test the manip.spad file (because I want to expand cos (2*x).) So I copy the manip.spad file in a local directory, add the silly lines in TRMANIP package ess : F -> F -- in the decl
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-02/msg00189.html (6,443 bytes)

45. [Axiom-developer] Windows space in directory/file names (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:47:58 -0500
Hi Bill: Thanks. I fixed the path and compiling problem by: (1) move the entire axiom directory to a different one j:\openaxiom\axiom from j:\Program Files\axiom (2) remove my old rm.exe from the h:\
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2005-01/msg00217.html (7,632 bytes)

46. RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] RE: Axiom domains and Aldor returntypes (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:01:51 -0500
William, Very Neat! Yes, this is a bug in the Windows version of Axiom caused by the fact that the Axiom code expects to be able to run unix system commands like `rm' (which means delete file). In th
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2005-01/msg00190.html (8,138 bytes)

47. Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] RE: Axiom domains and Aldor returntypes (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:00:00 -0500
In fact you just pointed a way to solve the problem! Notice that you are in effect constructing a domain! So first create this domain (call this anything else you like): --%PointedPrimeField )abbrev
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2005-01/msg00185.html (8,534 bytes)

48. RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: [Gcl-devel] ANSI test Windows OPEN.*failures (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:02:19 +1000
Hi Camm. Ultimately, hopefully, and not this week. I suspect not as I had the same symptom 6 months ago with an earlier stable GCL (perhaps 2.6.2?). Perhaps some other bug since fixed which coinciden
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2004-12/msg00014.html (6,404 bytes)

49. Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: [Gcl-devel] ANSI test Windows OPEN.* failures (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 01 Dec 2004 10:15:05 -0500
Greetings! Mike, are the warnings not issues on Linux, or is the warning reporting code failing on Windows? If the latter, can we isolate to a lisp command? I think this is the pathname-name case iss
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2004-12/msg00004.html (7,937 bytes)

50. [Axiom-developer] RE: [Gcl-devel] ANSI test Windows OPEN.* failures (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:04:27 +1000
file's proposed directory did not exist. I solved this with "ENSURE-DIRECTORIES-EXIST" in the function "get-io-index-stream" in "src/interpreter/nlib.lisp.pamphlet" and when I left for work this mor
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2004-11/msg00176.html (8,325 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu