www/philosophy free-sw.pt-br.html open-source-m...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     21/12/22 18:30:33

Modified files:
        philosophy     : free-sw.pt-br.html 
                         open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.html 
        philosophy/po  : free-sw.pt-br-en.html free-sw.pt-br.po 
                         open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-en.html 
                         open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.pt-br.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.53&r2=1.54
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.pt-br-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.pt-br.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.88&r2=1.89
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.65&r2=1.66

Patches:
Index: free-sw.pt-br.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.pt-br.html,v
retrieving revision 1.53
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -b -r1.53 -r1.54
--- free-sw.pt-br.html  10 Nov 2021 10:04:29 -0000      1.53
+++ free-sw.pt-br.html  22 Dec 2021 23:30:33 -0000      1.54
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="/philosophy/po/free-sw.pt-br.po">
- https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/free-sw.pt-br.po</a>'
- --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/free-sw.html"
- --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/free-sw.pt-br-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2021-09-11" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-sw.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-sw.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.pt-br.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
@@ -30,7 +25,6 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pt-br.html" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.pt-br.html" -->
 <!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pt-br.html" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.pt-br.html" -->
 <div class="article reduced-width">
 <h2>O que é o software livre?</h2>
@@ -244,13 +238,13 @@
 computacional específica.</p>
 
 <p>Por exemplo, se o código rejeitar arbitrariamente certos dados
-significativos &ndash; ou mesmo falhar incondicionalmente &ndash; isso pode
-tornar o programa menos útil, talvez até mesmo totalmente inútil, mas não
-nega aos usuários a liberdade de executar o programa, por isso não entra em
-conflito com a liberdade 0. Se o programa for livre, os usuários podem
-superar a perda de utilidade, porque as liberdades 1 e 3 permitem que
-usuários e comunidades façam e distribuam versões modificadas sem o código
-arbitrário de incômodo.</p>
+significativos – ou mesmo falhar incondicionalmente – isso pode tornar o
+programa menos útil, talvez até mesmo totalmente inútil, mas não nega aos
+usuários a liberdade de executar o programa, por isso não entra em conflito
+com a liberdade 0. Se o programa for livre, os usuários podem superar a
+perda de utilidade, porque as liberdades 1 e 3 permitem que usuários e
+comunidades façam e distribuam versões modificadas sem o código arbitrário
+de incômodo.</p>
 
 <p>“Como você desejar” inclui, opcionalmente, “de forma alguma” se 
for isso que
 você deseja. Portanto, não há necessidade de uma outra “liberdade para 
não
@@ -269,9 +263,9 @@
 <p>
 A liberdade 1 inclui a liberdade de usar sua versão modificada em lugar da
 original. Se um programa é entregue num produto projetado para rodar a
-versão de outra pessoa, mas se recusa a rodar a sua — prática conhecida 
como
+versão de outra pessoa, mas se recusa a rodar a sua – prática conhecida 
como
 “tivoização”<sup><a href="#TransNote1">1</a></sup>, “travamento” ou 
ainda
-(na terminologia perversa de seus praticantes) como “boot seguro” — a
+(na terminologia perversa de seus praticantes) como “boot seguro” – a
 liberdade 1 se torna pretensão vazia ao invés de realidade prática. Esses
 binários não são software livre mesmo que o código-fonte a partir do qual
 foram compilados seja livre.
@@ -280,8 +274,8 @@
 <p>
 Uma maneira importante de modificar um programa é agregar a ele módulos e
 sub-rotinas livres. Se a licença do programa diz que você não pode agregar a
-ele um módulo com uma licença adequada — por exemplo, se ele requer que 
você
-seja o detentor dos direitos autorais de qualquer código que adicionar —
+ele um módulo com uma licença adequada – por exemplo, se ele requer que 
você
+seja o detentor dos direitos autorais de qualquer código que adicionar –
 então essa licença é muito restritiva para ser qualificada como livre.
 </p>
 
@@ -538,7 +532,7 @@
 
 <p>
 Os mesmos argumentos também fazem sentido para outros tipos de trabalhos de
-uso prático — isto é, trabalhos que englobam conhecimento útil, como obras
+uso prático – isto é, trabalhos que englobam conhecimento útil, como obras
 educativas e de referência. A <a href="https://wikipedia.org";>Wikipédia</a>
 é o exemplo mais conhecido.
 </p>
@@ -815,7 +809,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última atualização:
 
-$Date: 2021/11/10 10:04:29 $
+$Date: 2021/12/22 23:30:33 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.html     11 Nov 2021 15:30:25 -0000      
1.28
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.html     22 Dec 2021 23:30:33 -0000      
1.29
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po">
- https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po</a>'
- --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"
- --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2021-09-12" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" 
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.pt-br.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
@@ -19,14 +14,12 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pt-br.html" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.pt-br.html" -->
 <!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pt-br.html" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.pt-br.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
 <h2>Por que o Código Aberto não compartilha dos objetivos do Software 
Livre</h2>
 
 <address class="byline">por Richard Stallman</address>
 
-<div class="article">
 <div class="important"><p>
 Os termos “software livre” e “código aberto” representam quase a 
mesma gama
 de programas. No entanto, eles dizem coisas profundamente diferentes sobre
@@ -437,7 +430,6 @@
 vez que você diz “software livre”, ao invés de “código aberto”, 
você ajuda
 nossa causa.</p>
 <div class="column-limit"></div>
-</div>
 
 <h3 class="footnote">Nota</h3>
 
@@ -500,6 +492,22 @@
 contribuição com traduções das páginas deste site.</p>
 </div>
 
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 <p>Copyright &copy; 2007, 2010, 2012-2016, 2019-2021 Richard Stallman</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está licenciada sob uma licença <a rel="license"
@@ -519,7 +527,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última atualização:
 
-$Date: 2021/11/11 15:30:25 $
+$Date: 2021/12/22 23:30:33 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/free-sw.pt-br-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.pt-br-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- po/free-sw.pt-br-en.html    5 Sep 2021 12:34:06 -0000       1.31
+++ po/free-sw.pt-br-en.html    22 Dec 2021 23:30:33 -0000      1.32
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 software</b>.  Thus, &ldquo;free software&rdquo; is a matter of
 liberty, not price.  To understand the concept, you should think of
 &ldquo;free&rdquo; as in &ldquo;free speech,&rdquo; not as in
-&ldquo;free beer&rdquo;.  We sometimes call it &ldquo;libre
+&ldquo;free beer.&rdquo;  We sometimes call it &ldquo;libre
 software,&rdquo; borrowing the French or Spanish word for
 &ldquo;free&rdquo; as in freedom, to show we do not mean the software
 is gratis.
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
 <h4 id="selling">Free software <em>can</em> be commercial</h4>
 
 <p>
-&ldquo;Free software&rdquo; does not mean &ldquo;noncommercial&rdquo;.
+&ldquo;Free software&rdquo; does not mean &ldquo;noncommercial.&rdquo;
 On the contrary, a free program must be available for commercial use,
 commercial development, and commercial distribution.  This policy is
 of fundamental importance&mdash;without this, free software could not
@@ -254,10 +254,10 @@
 <p>
 Freedom 1 includes the freedom to use your changed version in place of
 the original.  If the program is delivered in a product designed to
-run someone else's modified versions but refuse to run yours &mdash; a
-practice known as &ldquo;tivoization&rdquo; or &ldquo;lockdown&rdquo;,
+run someone else's modified versions but refuse to run yours&mdash;a
+practice known as &ldquo;tivoization&rdquo; or &ldquo;lockdown,&rdquo;
 or (in its practitioners' perverse terminology) as &ldquo;secure
-boot&rdquo; &mdash; freedom 1 becomes an empty pretense rather than a
+boot&rdquo;&mdash;freedom 1 becomes an empty pretense rather than a
 practical reality.  These binaries are not free
 software even if the source code they are compiled from is free.
 </p>
@@ -265,8 +265,8 @@
 <p>
 One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
 subroutines and modules.  If the program's license says that you
-cannot merge in a suitably licensed existing module &mdash; for instance, if it
-requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add &mdash; then the
+cannot merge in a suitably licensed existing module&mdash;for instance, if it
+requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add&mdash;then the
 license is too restrictive to qualify as free.
 </p>
 
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@
 <p>
 A free license may not require compliance with the license of a
 nonfree program.  Thus, for instance, if a license requires you to
-comply with the licenses of &ldquo;all the programs you use&rdquo;, in
+comply with the licenses of &ldquo;all the programs you use,&rdquo; in
 the case of a user that runs nonfree programs this would require
 compliance with the licenses of those nonfree programs; that makes the
 license nonfree.
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@
 
 <p id="open-source">
 Another group uses the term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; to mean
-something close (but not identical) to &ldquo;free software&rdquo;.  We
+something close (but not identical) to &ldquo;free software.&rdquo;  We
 prefer the term &ldquo;free software&rdquo; because, once you have heard that
 it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom.  The
 word &ldquo;open&rdquo; never refers to freedom.
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@
 
 <p>
 The same arguments also make sense for other kinds of works of
-practical use &mdash; that is to say, works that embody useful knowledge,
+practical use&mdash;that is to say, works that embody useful knowledge,
 such as educational works and reference
 works.  <a href="https://wikipedia.org";>Wikipedia</a> is the best-known
 example.
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@
 1.74</a>: Four clarifications of points not explicit enough, or stated
 in some places but not reflected everywhere:
 <ul>
-<li>"Improvements" does not mean the license can
+<li>&ldquo;Improvements&rdquo; does not mean the license can
 substantively limit what kinds of modified versions you can release.
 Freedom 3 includes distributing modified versions, not just changes.</li>
 <li>The right to merge in existing modules
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@
 </li>
 
 <li><a 
href="//web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.56&amp;r2=1.57">Version
-1.57</a>: Add &quot;Beyond Software&quot; section.</li>
+1.57</a>: Add &ldquo;Beyond Software&rdquo; section.</li>
 
 <li><a 
href="//web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.45&amp;r2=1.46">Version
 1.46</a>: Clarify whose purpose is significant in the freedom to run
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/05 12:34:06 $
+$Date: 2021/12/22 23:30:33 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/free-sw.pt-br.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.pt-br.po,v
retrieving revision 1.88
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -b -r1.88 -r1.89
--- po/free-sw.pt-br.po 22 Dec 2021 22:58:37 -0000      1.88
+++ po/free-sw.pt-br.po 22 Dec 2021 23:30:33 -0000      1.89
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
 "Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n > 1);\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2021-09-11 09:56+0000\n"
 "X-Generator: Poedit 3.0.1\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>

Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: 
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-en.html       19 Aug 2021 08:13:27 
-0000      1.16
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-en.html       22 Dec 2021 23:30:33 
-0000      1.17
@@ -10,12 +10,11 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
 <!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
 <h2>Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software</h2>
 
 <address class="byline">by Richard Stallman</address>
 
-<div class="article">
 <div class="important"><p>
 The terms &ldquo;free software&rdquo; and &ldquo;open
 source&rdquo; stand for almost the same range of programs.  However,
@@ -47,7 +46,7 @@
 operating system</a>.  Most of these users, however, have never heard of 
 the ethical reasons for which we developed this system and built the free 
 software community, because nowadays this system and community are more 
-often spoken of as &ldquo;open source&rdquo;, attributing them to a 
+often spoken of as &ldquo;open source,&rdquo; attributing them to a 
 different philosophy in which these freedoms are hardly mentioned.</p>
 
 <p>The free software movement has campaigned for computer users'
@@ -112,7 +111,7 @@
 want people to know we stand for freedom, so we do not accept being
 mislabeled as open source supporters.  What we advocate is not
 &ldquo;open source,&rdquo; and what we oppose is not &ldquo;closed
-source&rdquo;.  To make this clear, we avoid using those terms.
+source.&rdquo;  To make this clear, we avoid using those terms.
 </p>
 
 <h3>Practical Differences between Free Software and Open Source</h3>
@@ -129,7 +128,7 @@
 <p>Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one
 without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
 conditions.  <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/";>Microsoft
-does this with Visual Studio Code,</a> for example.</p>
+does this with Visual Studio Code</a>, for example.</p>
 
 <p>If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they
 qualify as open source but not as free software.  However, in that
@@ -140,7 +139,7 @@
 computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
 from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
 make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-capabilities.  We call these devices &ldquo;tyrants&rdquo;, and the
+capabilities.  We call these devices &ldquo;tyrants,&rdquo; and the
 practice is called &ldquo;tivoization&rdquo; after the product (Tivo)
 where we first saw it.  Even if the executable is made from free
 source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
@@ -246,7 +245,7 @@
 criteria for software licensing are simply not pertinent.  The only
 thing these activities have in common is that they somehow invite
 people to participate.  They stretch the term so far that it only
-means &ldquo;participatory&rdquo; or &ldquo;transparent&rdquo;, or
+means &ldquo;participatory&rdquo; or &ldquo;transparent,&rdquo; or
 less than that.  At worst, it
 has <a 
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/opinion/sunday/morozov-open-and-closed.html";>
 become a vacuous buzzword</a>.</p>
@@ -435,7 +434,6 @@
 than ever.  Every time you say &ldquo;free software&rdquo; rather than
 &ldquo;open source,&rdquo; you help our cause.</p>
 <div class="column-limit"></div>
-</div>
 
 <h3 class="footnote">Note</h3>
 
@@ -486,6 +484,23 @@
 of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
 <p>Copyright &copy; 2007, 2010, 2012-2016, 2019-2021 Richard Stallman</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:27 $
+$Date: 2021/12/22 23:30:33 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po,v
retrieving revision 1.65
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -b -r1.65 -r1.66
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po    22 Dec 2021 23:02:22 -0000      
1.65
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po    22 Dec 2021 23:30:33 -0000      
1.66
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
 "Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n > 1);\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2021-09-12 08:55+0000\n"
 "X-Generator: Poedit 3.0.1\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>