[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses gplv3-the-program.fr.html gplv3-th...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/licenses gplv3-the-program.fr.html gplv3-th... |
|
Date: |
Sat, 18 Dec 2021 05:06:18 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 21/12/18 05:06:17
Modified files:
licenses : gplv3-the-program.fr.html
gplv3-the-program.ru.html
licenses/po : gplv3-the-program.fr-en.html
gplv3-the-program.fr.po
gplv3-the-program.ru-en.html
gplv3-the-program.ru.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gplv3-the-program.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.58&r2=1.59
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gplv3-the-program.ru.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.55&r2=1.56
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.ru-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
Patches:
Index: gplv3-the-program.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gplv3-the-program.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.58
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -b -r1.58 -r1.59
--- gplv3-the-program.fr.html 28 Nov 2021 19:30:12 -0000 1.58
+++ gplv3-the-program.fr.html 18 Dec 2021 10:06:17 -0000 1.59
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gplv3-the-program.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.fr.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
+<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
<title>Que signifie «â¯le Programmeâ¯Â» dans la GPLv3â¯? - Projet GNU -
Free Software
@@ -9,7 +10,9 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.fr.html" -->
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Que signifie «â¯le Programmeâ¯Â» dans la GPLv3â¯?</h2>
+<div class="thin"></div>
<h3>Résumé</h3>
@@ -93,9 +96,9 @@
exemple en écrivant «â¯une création spécifiqueâ¯Â» plutôt que «â¯toute
créationâ¯Â», mais cela n'aurait pas éliminé la nécessité d'y
réfléchir. L'expression «â¯une création spécifique licenciée aux termes
de
-cette Licenceâ¯Â», considérée isolément, ne signifierait pas forcément
*la*
-création spécifique reçue par un «â¯vousâ¯Â» particulier dans un cas
-particulier de concession de licence ou de distribution. Notre examen
+cette Licenceâ¯Â», considérée isolément, ne signifierait pas forcément
+<em>la</em> création spécifique reçue par un «â¯vousâ¯Â» particulier
dans un
+cas particulier de concession de licence ou de distribution. Notre examen
d'autres licences de logiciel libre montre qu'elles soulèvent les mêmes
problèmes d'interprétation, du fait qu'elles font usage de pronoms et
adjectifs indéfinis <i>[words of general reference]</i> dans le but de
@@ -286,7 +289,8 @@
est publiée actuellement.
</p>
-<p><a href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html">Revenir à la FAQ</a></p>
+<p class="back"><a href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html">Revenir à la FAQ</a></p>
+</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -307,7 +311,7 @@
<!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.fr.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
+<div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
<div class="unprintable">
<p>Veuillez envoyer les requêtes concernant la FSF et GNU à <a
@@ -327,7 +331,7 @@
<web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p>
- <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a>. -->
@@ -342,7 +346,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -356,14 +360,13 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2007, 2008, 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2007, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>Cette page peut être utilisée suivant les conditions de la licence <a
rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.fr";>Creative
-Commons attribution, pas de modification, 3.0Â Ãtats-Unis (CCÂ BY-ND
-3.0Â US)</a>.
-</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.fr";>Creative
+Commons attribution, pas de modification, 4.0Â internationale (CCÂ BY-ND
+4.0)</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.fr.html" -->
<div class="translators-credits">
@@ -375,11 +378,12 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Dernière mise à jour :
-$Date: 2021/11/28 19:30:12 $
+$Date: 2021/12/18 10:06:17 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
</div>
+<!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
</body>
</html>
Index: gplv3-the-program.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gplv3-the-program.ru.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gplv3-the-program.ru.html 18 Dec 2021 08:13:01 -0000 1.7
+++ gplv3-the-program.ru.html 18 Dec 2021 10:06:17 -0000 1.8
@@ -10,7 +10,9 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ru.html" -->
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>ЧÑо в GPLv3 ознаÑÐ°ÐµÑ “ÐÑогÑамма”?</h2>
+<div class="thin"></div>
<h3>РезÑме</h3>
@@ -235,7 +237,8 @@
веÑÑии 3 GPL в Ñом виде, в каком она бÑла
ÑеалÑно опÑбликована.
</p>
-<p><a href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html">ÐеÑейÑи к вопÑоÑам и
оÑвеÑам</a></p>
+<p class="back"><a href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html">ÐеÑейÑи к
вопÑоÑам и оÑвеÑам</a></p>
+</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -294,7 +297,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2007, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2021 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2007, 2013, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>ÐÑо пÑоизведение доÑÑÑпно по <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.ru";>лиÑензии
@@ -314,7 +317,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ðбновлено:
-$Date: 2021/12/18 08:13:01 $
+$Date: 2021/12/18 10:06:17 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/gplv3-the-program.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- po/gplv3-the-program.fr-en.html 12 Apr 2014 13:54:26 -0000 1.35
+++ po/gplv3-the-program.fr-en.html 18 Dec 2021 10:06:17 -0000 1.36
@@ -1,26 +1,29 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
-<title>What does "the Program" mean in GPLv3?
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
+<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
+<title>What Does “The Program” Mean in GPLv3?
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
-<h2>What does "the Program" mean in GPLv3?</h2>
+<div class="article reduced-width">
+<h2>What Does “The Program” Mean in GPLv3?</h2>
+<div class="thin"></div>
<h3>Summary</h3>
-<p>In version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPLv3), the term "the
-Program" means one particular work that is licensed under GPLv3 and is
+<p>In version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPLv3), the term ”the
+Program” means one particular work that is licensed under GPLv3 and is
received by a particular licensee from an upstream licensor or
distributor. The Program is the particular work of software that you
received in a given instance of GPLv3 licensing, as you received it.</p>
-<p>"The Program" cannot mean "all the works ever licensed
-under GPLv3"; that interpretation makes no sense, because "the
-Program" is singular: those many different programs do not constitute
+<p>“The Program” cannot mean “all the works ever licensed
+under GPLv3”; that interpretation makes no sense, because “the
+Program” is singular: those many different programs do not constitute
one program.</p>
<p>In particular, this applies to the clause in section 10, paragraph 3
-of GPLv3 which states</p>
+of GPLv3 which states:</p>
<blockquote><p>[Y]ou may not initiate litigation (including a cross-claim or
counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that any patent claim is
@@ -45,9 +48,9 @@
<h3>Further analysis</h3>
-<p>GPLv3 defines "the Program" as follows:</p>
+<p>GPLv3 defines “the Program” as follows:</p>
-<blockquote><p>"The Program" refers to any copyrightable work
+<blockquote><p>“The Program” refers to any copyrightable work
licensed under this License.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some have contended that this definition can be read to mean all
@@ -56,60 +59,60 @@
readers have expressed particular concern about the consequences of
such an interpretation for the new patent provisions of GPLv3,
especially the patent termination condition found in the third
-paragraph 10 and the express patent license grant made by upstream
+paragraph of section 10 and the express patent license grant made by upstream
contributors under the third paragraph of section 11. This overbroad
-reading of "the Program" is incorrect, and contrary to our intent as
+reading of “the Program” is incorrect, and contrary to our intent
as
the drafters of GPLv3.</p>
-<p>The word "any" is susceptible to multiple, subtly different
-shades of meaning in English. In some contexts, "any" means
-"every" or "all"; in others, including the definition
-of "the Program" in GPLv3, it suggests "one particular
-instance of, selected from many possibilities". This variability has
+<p>The word “any” is susceptible to multiple, subtly different
+shades of meaning in English. In some contexts, “any” means
+“every” or “all”; in others, including the definition
+of “the Program” in GPLv3, it suggests “one particular
+instance of, selected from many possibilities.” This variability has
to be resolved by the context. This context resolves it, but it requires
some thought.</p>
-<p>We could have worded the definition of "the Program"
-differently, such as by using "a particular" instead of
-"any", but that would not have eliminated the need for thought.
-The phrase "a particular work licensed under this License",
-regarded in isolation, would not necessarily signify *the* particular work
-received by a particular "you" in a particular act of licensing
+<p>We could have worded the definition of “the Program”
+differently, such as by using “a particular” instead of
+“any,” but that would not have eliminated the need for thought.
+The phrase “a particular work licensed under this License,”
+regarded in isolation, would not necessarily signify <em>the</em> particular
work
+received by a particular “you” in a particular act of licensing
or distribution. Our review of other free software licenses shows that
they raise similar issues of interpretation, with words of general
reference used in order to facilitate license reuse.</p>
<p>Given that no choice is so clear that all other candidate meanings
-must be rejected, "any" has certain advantages. It is a somewhat
+must be rejected, “any” has certain advantages. It is a somewhat
more informal and less legalistic usage than the possible
alternatives, an appropriate register for the developers reading
-and applying the license. Moreover, the usage of "any", through
+and applying the license. Moreover, the usage of “any,” through
its suggestion of selection out of many qualifying possibilities,
has the effect of emphasizing the reusability of GPLv3 for
multiple works of software and in multiple licensing situations.
The GNU GPL is intended to be used by many developers on their programs
and that too needs to be clear.</p>
-<p>The same use of "any" that has given rise to interpretive
+<p>The same use of “any” that has given rise to interpretive
concerns under GPLv3 exists in GPLv2, in its corresponding definition.
Section 0 of GPLv2 states:</p>
<blockquote><p>This License applies to any program or other work which
contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be
distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The
- "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a
- "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any
+ “Program,” below, refers to any such program or work, and a
+ “work based on the Program” means either the Program or any
derivative work under copyright law …</p></blockquote>
<p>However, it has always been the understanding of the FSF and others in
-the GPL-using community that "the Program" in GPLv2 means the
+the GPL-using community that “the Program” in GPLv2 means the
particular GPL-covered work that you receive, before you make any
-possible modifications to it. The definition of "the Program" in
+possible modifications to it. The definition of “the Program” in
GPLv3 is intended to preserve this meaning.</p>
<p>We can find no clause in GPLv3 in which applying the suggested broad
-interpretation of "the Program" (and the superset term
-"covered work") would make sense or have any practical
+interpretation of “the Program” (and the superset term
+“covered work”) would make sense or have any practical
significance, consistent with the wording of the clause and its drafting
history. The patent provisions of GPLv3 are a case in point.</p>
@@ -121,11 +124,11 @@
modify and propagate the contents of its contributor
version.</p></blockquote>
-<p>A "contributor" is defined as "a copyright holder who
+<p>A “contributor” is defined as “a copyright holder who
authorizes use under this License of the Program or a work on which the
-Program is based."</p>
+Program is based.”</p>
-<p>The broad reading of "the Program", it has been suggested,
+<p>The broad reading of “the Program,” it has been suggested,
gives rise to an unreasonably broad patent license grant. The reasoning is
that, for a given GPLv3 licensee, the set of contributors granting patent
licenses becomes all GPLv3 licensors of all GPLv3-covered works in the
@@ -135,7 +138,7 @@
<p>Close attention to the wording of the patent license grant, however,
shows that these concerns are unfounded. In order to exercise the
permissions of the patent license grant, a GPLv3 licensee must have
-"the contents of [the contributor's] contributor version" in his
+“the contents of [the contributor's] contributor version” in his
possession. If he does, then he is necessarily a recipient of that
material, licensed to him under GPLv3.</p>
@@ -144,16 +147,16 @@
benefiting from the patent license grant has ultimately received the
material covered by the grant from those contributors. If it were
otherwise, the patent license grant would be meaningless, because the
-exercise of its permissions is tied to the contributor's "contributor
-version". The contributors and the section 11 patent licensee stand
+exercise of its permissions is tied to the contributor's “contributor
+version.” The contributors and the section 11 patent licensee stand
in a direct or indirect distribution relationship. Therefore, section 11,
paragraph 3 does not require you to grant a patent license to anyone who is
not also your copyright licensee. (Non-contributor redistributors remain
subject to applicable implied patent license doctrine and to the special
-"automatic extension" provision of section 11, paragraph 6.)</p>
+“automatic extension” provision of section 11, paragraph 6.)</p>
-<p>There is similarly no basis for the broad reading of "the
-Program" when one considers the patent-related clause in the third
+<p>There is similarly no basis for the broad reading of “the
+Program” when one considers the patent-related clause in the third
paragraph of section 10. This clause provides:</p>
<blockquote><p>[Y]ou may not initiate litigation (including a cross-claim
@@ -179,7 +182,7 @@
licenses, notably the Mozilla Public License version 1.1, with respect
to termination of patent licenses.</p>
-<p>If the suggested interpretation of "the Program" applied to the
+<p>If the suggested interpretation of “the Program” applied to the
section 10, paragraph 3 clause, the result would be a radical
departure from our consistent past statements and policies concerning
patent retaliation, which we clearly did not intend.</p>
@@ -209,22 +212,23 @@
retaliation was criticized because it could apply to software patent
lawsuits in which the accused software was unrelated to the software
that was the subject of the license. Seeing that there were no widely
-used licenses with which this would provide compatibility, in draft 3
+used licenses with which this would provide compatibility, in Draft 3
we dropped broad patent retaliation from the range of GPL
compatibility.</p>
<p>We did so by replacing 7(b)(5) with text in section 10, in which we
kept only what corresponded to the second category. The first
-category therefore reverted to being a GPL-incompatible "further
-restriction" in Draft 3, and likewise in GPL version 3 as actually
+category therefore reverted to being a GPL-incompatible “further
+restriction” in Draft 3, and likewise in GPL version 3 as actually
published.
</p>
-<p><a href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html">Return to the FAQ</a></p>
+<p class="back"><a href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html">Return to the FAQ</a></p>
+</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
+<div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
<div class="unprintable">
<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
@@ -242,19 +246,19 @@
to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org";>
<web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p>
- <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and contributing translations
of this article.</p>
</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -269,21 +273,20 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2007, 2008, 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2007, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:54:26 $
+$Date: 2021/12/18 10:06:17 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
-</div>
+</div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
</body>
</html>
Index: po/gplv3-the-program.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.55
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -b -r1.55 -r1.56
--- po/gplv3-the-program.fr.po 18 Dec 2021 09:36:17 -0000 1.55
+++ po/gplv3-the-program.fr.po 18 Dec 2021 10:06:17 -0000 1.56
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Cette page peut être utilisée suivant les conditions de la licence <a rel="
"\"license\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.fr";
-"\">Creative Commons attribution, pas de modification, 4.0 internationale "
+"\">Creative Commons attribution, pas de modification, 4.0Â internationale "
"(CCÂ BY-ND 4.0)</a>."
#. TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.
Index: po/gplv3-the-program.ru-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.ru-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- po/gplv3-the-program.ru-en.html 18 Dec 2021 08:13:02 -0000 1.5
+++ po/gplv3-the-program.ru-en.html 18 Dec 2021 10:06:17 -0000 1.6
@@ -1,23 +1,25 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
-<title>What does "the Program" mean in GPLv3?
+<title>What Does “The Program” Mean in GPLv3?
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
-<h2>What does "the Program" mean in GPLv3?</h2>
+<div class="article reduced-width">
+<h2>What Does “The Program” Mean in GPLv3?</h2>
+<div class="thin"></div>
<h3>Summary</h3>
-<p>In version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPLv3), the term "the
-Program" means one particular work that is licensed under GPLv3 and is
+<p>In version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPLv3), the term ”the
+Program” means one particular work that is licensed under GPLv3 and is
received by a particular licensee from an upstream licensor or
distributor. The Program is the particular work of software that you
received in a given instance of GPLv3 licensing, as you received it.</p>
-<p>"The Program" cannot mean "all the works ever licensed
-under GPLv3"; that interpretation makes no sense, because "the
-Program" is singular: those many different programs do not constitute
+<p>“The Program” cannot mean “all the works ever licensed
+under GPLv3”; that interpretation makes no sense, because “the
+Program” is singular: those many different programs do not constitute
one program.</p>
<p>In particular, this applies to the clause in section 10, paragraph 3
@@ -46,9 +48,9 @@
<h3>Further analysis</h3>
-<p>GPLv3 defines "the Program" as follows:</p>
+<p>GPLv3 defines “the Program” as follows:</p>
-<blockquote><p>"The Program" refers to any copyrightable work
+<blockquote><p>“The Program” refers to any copyrightable work
licensed under this License.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some have contended that this definition can be read to mean all
@@ -59,58 +61,58 @@
especially the patent termination condition found in the third
paragraph of section 10 and the express patent license grant made by upstream
contributors under the third paragraph of section 11. This overbroad
-reading of "the Program" is incorrect, and contrary to our intent as
+reading of “the Program” is incorrect, and contrary to our intent
as
the drafters of GPLv3.</p>
-<p>The word "any" is susceptible to multiple, subtly different
-shades of meaning in English. In some contexts, "any" means
-"every" or "all"; in others, including the definition
-of "the Program" in GPLv3, it suggests "one particular
-instance of, selected from many possibilities". This variability has
+<p>The word “any” is susceptible to multiple, subtly different
+shades of meaning in English. In some contexts, “any” means
+“every” or “all”; in others, including the definition
+of “the Program” in GPLv3, it suggests “one particular
+instance of, selected from many possibilities.” This variability has
to be resolved by the context. This context resolves it, but it requires
some thought.</p>
-<p>We could have worded the definition of "the Program"
-differently, such as by using "a particular" instead of
-"any", but that would not have eliminated the need for thought.
-The phrase "a particular work licensed under this License",
+<p>We could have worded the definition of “the Program”
+differently, such as by using “a particular” instead of
+“any,” but that would not have eliminated the need for thought.
+The phrase “a particular work licensed under this License,”
regarded in isolation, would not necessarily signify <em>the</em> particular
work
-received by a particular "you" in a particular act of licensing
+received by a particular “you” in a particular act of licensing
or distribution. Our review of other free software licenses shows that
they raise similar issues of interpretation, with words of general
reference used in order to facilitate license reuse.</p>
<p>Given that no choice is so clear that all other candidate meanings
-must be rejected, "any" has certain advantages. It is a somewhat
+must be rejected, “any” has certain advantages. It is a somewhat
more informal and less legalistic usage than the possible
alternatives, an appropriate register for the developers reading
-and applying the license. Moreover, the usage of "any", through
+and applying the license. Moreover, the usage of “any,” through
its suggestion of selection out of many qualifying possibilities,
has the effect of emphasizing the reusability of GPLv3 for
multiple works of software and in multiple licensing situations.
The GNU GPL is intended to be used by many developers on their programs
and that too needs to be clear.</p>
-<p>The same use of "any" that has given rise to interpretive
+<p>The same use of “any” that has given rise to interpretive
concerns under GPLv3 exists in GPLv2, in its corresponding definition.
Section 0 of GPLv2 states:</p>
<blockquote><p>This License applies to any program or other work which
contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be
distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The
- "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a
- "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any
+ “Program,” below, refers to any such program or work, and a
+ “work based on the Program” means either the Program or any
derivative work under copyright law …</p></blockquote>
<p>However, it has always been the understanding of the FSF and others in
-the GPL-using community that "the Program" in GPLv2 means the
+the GPL-using community that “the Program” in GPLv2 means the
particular GPL-covered work that you receive, before you make any
-possible modifications to it. The definition of "the Program" in
+possible modifications to it. The definition of “the Program” in
GPLv3 is intended to preserve this meaning.</p>
<p>We can find no clause in GPLv3 in which applying the suggested broad
-interpretation of "the Program" (and the superset term
-"covered work") would make sense or have any practical
+interpretation of “the Program” (and the superset term
+“covered work”) would make sense or have any practical
significance, consistent with the wording of the clause and its drafting
history. The patent provisions of GPLv3 are a case in point.</p>
@@ -122,11 +124,11 @@
modify and propagate the contents of its contributor
version.</p></blockquote>
-<p>A "contributor" is defined as "a copyright holder who
+<p>A “contributor” is defined as “a copyright holder who
authorizes use under this License of the Program or a work on which the
-Program is based."</p>
+Program is based.”</p>
-<p>The broad reading of "the Program", it has been suggested,
+<p>The broad reading of “the Program,” it has been suggested,
gives rise to an unreasonably broad patent license grant. The reasoning is
that, for a given GPLv3 licensee, the set of contributors granting patent
licenses becomes all GPLv3 licensors of all GPLv3-covered works in the
@@ -136,7 +138,7 @@
<p>Close attention to the wording of the patent license grant, however,
shows that these concerns are unfounded. In order to exercise the
permissions of the patent license grant, a GPLv3 licensee must have
-"the contents of [the contributor's] contributor version" in his
+“the contents of [the contributor's] contributor version” in his
possession. If he does, then he is necessarily a recipient of that
material, licensed to him under GPLv3.</p>
@@ -145,16 +147,16 @@
benefiting from the patent license grant has ultimately received the
material covered by the grant from those contributors. If it were
otherwise, the patent license grant would be meaningless, because the
-exercise of its permissions is tied to the contributor's "contributor
-version". The contributors and the section 11 patent licensee stand
+exercise of its permissions is tied to the contributor's “contributor
+version.” The contributors and the section 11 patent licensee stand
in a direct or indirect distribution relationship. Therefore, section 11,
paragraph 3 does not require you to grant a patent license to anyone who is
not also your copyright licensee. (Non-contributor redistributors remain
subject to applicable implied patent license doctrine and to the special
-"automatic extension" provision of section 11, paragraph 6.)</p>
+“automatic extension” provision of section 11, paragraph 6.)</p>
-<p>There is similarly no basis for the broad reading of "the
-Program" when one considers the patent-related clause in the third
+<p>There is similarly no basis for the broad reading of “the
+Program” when one considers the patent-related clause in the third
paragraph of section 10. This clause provides:</p>
<blockquote><p>[Y]ou may not initiate litigation (including a cross-claim
@@ -180,7 +182,7 @@
licenses, notably the Mozilla Public License version 1.1, with respect
to termination of patent licenses.</p>
-<p>If the suggested interpretation of "the Program" applied to the
+<p>If the suggested interpretation of “the Program” applied to the
section 10, paragraph 3 clause, the result would be a radical
departure from our consistent past statements and policies concerning
patent retaliation, which we clearly did not intend.</p>
@@ -216,12 +218,13 @@
<p>We did so by replacing 7(b)(5) with text in section 10, in which we
kept only what corresponded to the second category. The first
-category therefore reverted to being a GPL-incompatible "further
-restriction" in Draft 3, and likewise in GPL version 3 as actually
+category therefore reverted to being a GPL-incompatible “further
+restriction” in Draft 3, and likewise in GPL version 3 as actually
published.
</p>
-<p><a href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html">Return to the FAQ</a></p>
+<p class="back"><a href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html">Return to the FAQ</a></p>
+</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -270,7 +273,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2007, 2008, 2014, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2007, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -280,7 +283,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/12/18 08:13:02 $
+$Date: 2021/12/18 10:06:17 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/gplv3-the-program.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gplv3-the-program.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- po/gplv3-the-program.ru.po 18 Dec 2021 09:13:40 -0000 1.16
+++ po/gplv3-the-program.ru.po 18 Dec 2021 10:06:17 -0000 1.17
@@ -15,14 +15,8 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2021-12-18 08:56+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
-# | What [-does "the Program" mean-] {+Does “The
-# | Program” Mean+} in GPLv3? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
-#| msgid ""
-#| "What does "the Program" mean in GPLv3? - GNU Project - Free "
-#| "Software Foundation"
msgid ""
"What Does “The Program” Mean in GPLv3? - GNU Project - Free "
"Software Foundation"
@@ -31,9 +25,6 @@
"пÑогÑаммного обеÑпеÑениÑ"
#. type: Content of: <div><h2>
-# | What [-does "the Program" mean-] {+Does “The
-# | Program” Mean+} in GPLv3?
-#| msgid "What does "the Program" mean in GPLv3?"
msgid "What Does “The Program” Mean in GPLv3?"
msgstr "ЧÑо в GPLv3 ознаÑÐ°ÐµÑ “ÐÑогÑамма”?"
@@ -42,18 +33,6 @@
msgstr "РезÑме"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | In version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPLv3), the term
-# | [-"the Program"-] {+”the Program”+} means one
-# | particular work that is licensed under GPLv3 and is received by a
-# | particular licensee from an upstream licensor or distributor. The Program
-# | is the particular work of software that you received in a given instance
-# | of GPLv3 licensing, as you received it.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "In version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPLv3), the term ""
-#| "the Program" means one particular work that is licensed under GPLv3 "
-#| "and is received by a particular licensee from an upstream licensor or "
-#| "distributor. The Program is the particular work of software that you "
-#| "received in a given instance of GPLv3 licensing, as you received it."
msgid ""
"In version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPLv3), the term ”the "
"Program” means one particular work that is licensed under GPLv3 and is "
@@ -69,16 +48,6 @@
"каком Ð²Ñ ÐµÐµ полÑÑили."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | [-"The Program"-]{+“The Program”+} cannot mean
-# | [-"all-] {+“all+} the works ever licensed under
-# | [-GPLv3";-] {+GPLv3”;+} that interpretation makes no sense,
-# | because [-"the Program"-] {+“the Program”+} is
-# | singular: those many different programs do not constitute one program.
-#| msgid ""
-#| ""The Program" cannot mean "all the works ever licensed "
-#| "under GPLv3"; that interpretation makes no sense, because "the "
-#| "Program" is singular: those many different programs do not "
-#| "constitute one program."
msgid ""
"“The Program” cannot mean “all the works ever licensed "
"under GPLv3”; that interpretation makes no sense, because “the "
@@ -147,18 +116,10 @@
msgstr "ÐодÑобнÑй анализ"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | GPLv3 defines [-"the Program"-] {+“the Program”+} as
-# | follows:
-#| msgid "GPLv3 defines "the Program" as follows:"
msgid "GPLv3 defines “the Program” as follows:"
msgstr "GPLv3 опÑеделÑÐµÑ “ÐÑогÑаммє
ÑледÑÑÑим обÑазом:"
#. type: Content of: <div><blockquote><p>
-# | [-"The Program"-]{+“The Program”+} refers to any
-# | copyrightable work licensed under this License.
-#| msgid ""
-#| ""The Program" refers to any copyrightable work licensed under "
-#| "this License."
msgid ""
"“The Program” refers to any copyrightable work licensed under "
"this License."
@@ -167,27 +128,6 @@
"авÑоÑÑкое пÑаво, лиÑензиÑÑемÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾ ÑÑой
ÐиÑензии."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Some have contended that this definition can be read to mean all
-# | GPLv3-licensed works, rather than the one particular GPLv3-licensed work
-# | received by a licensee in a given licensing context. These readers have
-# | expressed particular concern about the consequences of such an
-# | interpretation for the new patent provisions of GPLv3, especially the
-# | patent termination condition found in the third paragraph of section 10
-# | and the express patent license grant made by upstream contributors under
-# | the third paragraph of section 11. This overbroad reading of [-"the
-# | Program"-] {+“the Program”+} is incorrect, and contrary
-# | to our intent as the drafters of GPLv3.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Some have contended that this definition can be read to mean all GPLv3-"
-#| "licensed works, rather than the one particular GPLv3-licensed work "
-#| "received by a licensee in a given licensing context. These readers have "
-#| "expressed particular concern about the consequences of such an "
-#| "interpretation for the new patent provisions of GPLv3, especially the "
-#| "patent termination condition found in the third paragraph of section 10 "
-#| "and the express patent license grant made by upstream contributors under "
-#| "the third paragraph of section 11. This overbroad reading of "the "
-#| "Program" is incorrect, and contrary to our intent as the drafters of "
-#| "GPLv3."
msgid ""
"Some have contended that this definition can be read to mean all GPLv3-"
"licensed works, rather than the one particular GPLv3-licensed work received "
@@ -211,24 +151,6 @@
"пиÑали GPLv3."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | The word [-"any"-] {+“any”+} is susceptible to
-# | multiple, subtly different shades of meaning in English. In some
-# | contexts, [-"any"-] {+“any”+} means
-# | [-"every"-] {+“every”+} or [-"all";-]
-# | {+“all”;+} in others, including the definition of [-"the
-# | Program"-] {+“the Program”+} in GPLv3, it suggests
-# | [-"one-] {+“one+} particular instance of, selected from many
-# | [-possibilities".-] {+possibilities.”+} This variability has to
-# | be resolved by the context. This context resolves it, but it requires
-# | some thought.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The word "any" is susceptible to multiple, subtly different "
-#| "shades of meaning in English. In some contexts, "any" means "
-#| ""every" or "all"; in others, including the definition "
-#| "of "the Program" in GPLv3, it suggests "one particular "
-#| "instance of, selected from many possibilities". This variability "
-#| "has to be resolved by the context. This context resolves it, but it "
-#| "requires some thought."
msgid ""
"The word “any” is susceptible to multiple, subtly different "
"shades of meaning in English. In some contexts, “any” means "
@@ -247,28 +169,6 @@
"ÑÑебÑÐµÑ Ð½ÐµÐºÐ¾ÑоÑÑÑ
ÑазмÑÑлений."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | We could have worded the definition of [-"the Program"-]
-# | {+“the Program”+} differently, such as by using [-"a
-# | particular"-] {+“a particular”+} instead of
-# | [-"any",-] {+“any,”+} but that would not have
-# | eliminated the need for thought. The phrase [-"a-] {+“a+}
-# | particular work licensed under this [-License",-] {+License,”+}
-# | regarded in isolation, would not necessarily signify <em>the</em>
-# | particular work received by a particular [-"you"-]
-# | {+“you”+} in a particular act of licensing or distribution.
-# | Our review of other free software licenses shows that they raise similar
-# | issues of interpretation, with words of general reference used in order to
-# | facilitate license reuse.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "We could have worded the definition of "the Program" "
-#| "differently, such as by using "a particular" instead of ""
-#| "any", but that would not have eliminated the need for thought. The "
-#| "phrase "a particular work licensed under this License", "
-#| "regarded in isolation, would not necessarily signify <em>the</em> "
-#| "particular work received by a particular "you" in a particular "
-#| "act of licensing or distribution. Our review of other free software "
-#| "licenses shows that they raise similar issues of interpretation, with "
-#| "words of general reference used in order to facilitate license reuse."
msgid ""
"We could have worded the definition of “the Program” "
"differently, such as by using “a particular” instead of “"
@@ -291,26 +191,6 @@
"ÑпоÑÑеблÑемÑÑ
Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ³ÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð²ÑоÑного
иÑполÑÐ·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð»Ð¸Ñензии."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Given that no choice is so clear that all other candidate meanings must be
-# | rejected, [-"any"-] {+“any”+} has certain
-# | advantages. It is a somewhat more informal and less legalistic usage than
-# | the possible alternatives, an appropriate register for the developers
-# | reading and applying the license. Moreover, the usage of
-# | [-"any",-] {+“any,”+} through its suggestion of
-# | selection out of many qualifying possibilities, has the effect of
-# | emphasizing the reusability of GPLv3 for multiple works of software and in
-# | multiple licensing situations. The GNU GPL is intended to be used by many
-# | developers on their programs and that too needs to be clear.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Given that no choice is so clear that all other candidate meanings must "
-#| "be rejected, "any" has certain advantages. It is a somewhat "
-#| "more informal and less legalistic usage than the possible alternatives, "
-#| "an appropriate register for the developers reading and applying the "
-#| "license. Moreover, the usage of "any", through its suggestion "
-#| "of selection out of many qualifying possibilities, has the effect of "
-#| "emphasizing the reusability of GPLv3 for multiple works of software and "
-#| "in multiple licensing situations. The GNU GPL is intended to be used by "
-#| "many developers on their programs and that too needs to be clear."
msgid ""
"Given that no choice is so clear that all other candidate meanings must be "
"rejected, “any” has certain advantages. It is a somewhat more "
@@ -334,13 +214,6 @@
"ÑазÑабоÑÑиками, и ÑÑо Ñоже должно бÑÑÑ
ÑÑно."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | The same use of [-"any"-] {+“any”+} that has given
-# | rise to interpretive concerns under GPLv3 exists in GPLv2, in its
-# | corresponding definition. Section 0 of GPLv2 states:
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The same use of "any" that has given rise to interpretive "
-#| "concerns under GPLv3 exists in GPLv2, in its corresponding definition. "
-#| "Section 0 of GPLv2 states:"
msgid ""
"The same use of “any” that has given rise to interpretive "
"concerns under GPLv3 exists in GPLv2, in its corresponding definition. "
@@ -351,20 +224,6 @@
"ÑооÑвеÑÑÑвÑÑÑем опÑеделении. Раздел 0
GPLv2 глаÑиÑ:"
#. type: Content of: <div><blockquote><p>
-# | This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice
-# | placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the
-# | terms of this General Public License. The [-"Program",-]
-# | {+“Program,”+} below, refers to any such program or work, and
-# | a [-"work-] {+“work+} based on the [-Program"-]
-# | {+Program”+} means either the Program or any derivative work under
-# | copyright law …
-#| msgid ""
-#| "This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice "
-#| "placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the "
-#| "terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, "
-#| "refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the "
-#| "Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under "
-#| "copyright law …"
msgid ""
"This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice "
"placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms "
@@ -380,18 +239,6 @@
"либо лÑбое пÑоизводное пÑоизведение в
ÑеÑминаÑ
авÑоÑÑкого пÑава..."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | However, it has always been the understanding of the FSF and others in the
-# | GPL-using community that [-"the Program"-] {+“the
-# | Program”+} in GPLv2 means the particular GPL-covered work that you
-# | receive, before you make any possible modifications to it. The definition
-# | of [-"the Program"-] {+“the Program”+} in GPLv3 is
-# | intended to preserve this meaning.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "However, it has always been the understanding of the FSF and others in "
-#| "the GPL-using community that "the Program" in GPLv2 means the "
-#| "particular GPL-covered work that you receive, before you make any "
-#| "possible modifications to it. The definition of "the Program" "
-#| "in GPLv3 is intended to preserve this meaning."
msgid ""
"However, it has always been the understanding of the FSF and others in the "
"GPL-using community that “the Program” in GPLv2 means the "
@@ -406,18 +253,6 @@
"ÐÑогÑаммє в GPLv3 бÑÐ´ÐµÑ ÑоÑ
ÑанÑÑÑ ÑÑо
знаÑение."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | We can find no clause in GPLv3 in which applying the suggested broad
-# | interpretation of [-"the Program"-] {+“the
-# | Program”+} (and the superset term [-"covered work")-]
-# | {+“covered work”)+} would make sense or have any practical
-# | significance, consistent with the wording of the clause and its drafting
-# | history. The patent provisions of GPLv3 are a case in point.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "We can find no clause in GPLv3 in which applying the suggested broad "
-#| "interpretation of "the Program" (and the superset term ""
-#| "covered work") would make sense or have any practical significance, "
-#| "consistent with the wording of the clause and its drafting history. The "
-#| "patent provisions of GPLv3 are a case in point."
msgid ""
"We can find no clause in GPLv3 in which applying the suggested broad "
"interpretation of “the Program” (and the superset term “"
@@ -450,14 +285,6 @@
"ÑаÑпÑоÑÑÑанÑеÑÑÑ Ð½Ð° вÑе ÑÑÑеÑÑвеннÑе
пÑнкÑÑ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑов ÑоÑазÑабоÑÑика."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | A [-"contributor"-] {+“contributor”+} is defined as
-# | [-"a-] {+“a+} copyright holder who authorizes use under this
-# | License of the Program or a work on which the Program is [-based."-]
-# | {+based.”+}
-#| msgid ""
-#| "A "contributor" is defined as "a copyright holder who "
-#| "authorizes use under this License of the Program or a work on which the "
-#| "Program is based.""
msgid ""
"A “contributor” is defined as “a copyright holder who "
"authorizes use under this License of the Program or a work on which the "
@@ -468,20 +295,6 @@
"пÑоизведениÑ, пÑоизводнÑм Ð¾Ñ ÐºÐ¾ÑоÑого
ÑвлÑеÑÑÑ ÐÑогÑамма”."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | The broad reading of [-"the Program",-] {+“the
-# | Program,”+} it has been suggested, gives rise to an unreasonably
-# | broad patent license grant. The reasoning is that, for a given GPLv3
-# | licensee, the set of contributors granting patent licenses becomes all
-# | GPLv3 licensors of all GPLv3-covered works in the world, and not merely
-# | licensors of the specific work received by that licensee in a particular
-# | act of licensing.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The broad reading of "the Program", it has been suggested, "
-#| "gives rise to an unreasonably broad patent license grant. The reasoning "
-#| "is that, for a given GPLv3 licensee, the set of contributors granting "
-#| "patent licenses becomes all GPLv3 licensors of all GPLv3-covered works in "
-#| "the world, and not merely licensors of the specific work received by that "
-#| "licensee in a particular act of licensing."
msgid ""
"The broad reading of “the Program,” it has been suggested, gives "
"rise to an unreasonably broad patent license grant. The reasoning is that, "
@@ -498,20 +311,6 @@
"ÑабоÑÑ, полÑÑенной лиÑензиаÑом в
конкÑеÑном акÑе лиÑензиÑованиÑ."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Close attention to the wording of the patent license grant, however, shows
-# | that these concerns are unfounded. In order to exercise the permissions
-# | of the patent license grant, a GPLv3 licensee must have [-"the-]
-# | {+“the+} contents of [the contributor's] contributor
-# | [-version"-] {+version”+} in his possession. If he does, then
-# | he is necessarily a recipient of that material, licensed to him under
-# | GPLv3.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Close attention to the wording of the patent license grant, however, "
-#| "shows that these concerns are unfounded. In order to exercise the "
-#| "permissions of the patent license grant, a GPLv3 licensee must have ""
-#| "the contents of [the contributor's] contributor version" in his "
-#| "possession. If he does, then he is necessarily a recipient of that "
-#| "material, licensed to him under GPLv3."
msgid ""
"Close attention to the wording of the patent license grant, however, shows "
"that these concerns are unfounded. In order to exercise the permissions of "
@@ -528,35 +327,6 @@
"лиÑензиÑованного ÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ GPLv3."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Therefore, contributors are always the actual copyright licensors of the
-# | material that is the subject of the patent license grant. The user
-# | benefiting from the patent license grant has ultimately received the
-# | material covered by the grant from those contributors. If it were
-# | otherwise, the patent license grant would be meaningless, because the
-# | exercise of its permissions is tied to the contributor's
-# | [-"contributor version".-] {+“contributor
-# | version.”+} The contributors and the section 11 patent licensee
-# | stand in a direct or indirect distribution relationship. Therefore,
-# | section 11, paragraph 3 does not require you to grant a patent license to
-# | anyone who is not also your copyright licensee. (Non-contributor
-# | redistributors remain subject to applicable implied patent license
-# | doctrine and to the special [-"automatic extension"-]
-# | {+“automatic extension”+} provision of section 11, paragraph
-# | 6.)
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Therefore, contributors are always the actual copyright licensors of the "
-#| "material that is the subject of the patent license grant. The user "
-#| "benefiting from the patent license grant has ultimately received the "
-#| "material covered by the grant from those contributors. If it were "
-#| "otherwise, the patent license grant would be meaningless, because the "
-#| "exercise of its permissions is tied to the contributor's ""
-#| "contributor version". The contributors and the section 11 patent "
-#| "licensee stand in a direct or indirect distribution relationship. "
-#| "Therefore, section 11, paragraph 3 does not require you to grant a patent "
-#| "license to anyone who is not also your copyright licensee. (Non-"
-#| "contributor redistributors remain subject to applicable implied patent "
-#| "license doctrine and to the special "automatic extension" "
-#| "provision of section 11, paragraph 6.)"
msgid ""
"Therefore, contributors are always the actual copyright licensors of the "
"material that is the subject of the patent license grant. The user "
@@ -587,14 +357,6 @@
"ÑаÑпÑоÑÑÑанениє абзаÑа 6
Ñаздела 11.)"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | There is similarly no basis for the broad reading of [-"the
-# | Program"-] {+“the Program”+} when one considers the
-# | patent-related clause in the third paragraph of section 10. This clause
-# | provides:
-#| msgid ""
-#| "There is similarly no basis for the broad reading of "the "
-#| "Program" when one considers the patent-related clause in the third "
-#| "paragraph of section 10. This clause provides:"
msgid ""
"There is similarly no basis for the broad reading of “the "
"Program” when one considers the patent-related clause in the third "
@@ -645,16 +407,6 @@
"лиÑензии Mozilla веÑÑии 1.1, каÑаÑелÑно
пÑекÑаÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑнÑÑ
лиÑензий."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | If the suggested interpretation of [-"the Program"-]
-# | {+“the Program”+} applied to the section 10, paragraph 3
-# | clause, the result would be a radical departure from our consistent past
-# | statements and policies concerning patent retaliation, which we clearly
-# | did not intend.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "If the suggested interpretation of "the Program" applied to the "
-#| "section 10, paragraph 3 clause, the result would be a radical departure "
-#| "from our consistent past statements and policies concerning patent "
-#| "retaliation, which we clearly did not intend."
msgid ""
"If the suggested interpretation of “the Program” applied to the "
"section 10, paragraph 3 clause, the result would be a radical departure from "
@@ -733,17 +485,6 @@
"диапазона ÑовмеÑÑимоÑÑи Ñ GPL. "
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | We did so by replacing 7(b)(5) with text in section 10, in which we kept
-# | only what corresponded to the second category. The first category
-# | therefore reverted to being a GPL-incompatible [-"further
-# | restriction"-] {+“further restriction”+} in Draft 3, and
-# | likewise in GPL version 3 as actually published.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "We did so by replacing 7(b)(5) with text in section 10, in which we kept "
-#| "only what corresponded to the second category. The first category "
-#| "therefore reverted to being a GPL-incompatible "further "
-#| "restriction" in Draft 3, and likewise in GPL version 3 as actually "
-#| "published."
msgid ""
"We did so by replacing 7(b)(5) with text in section 10, in which we kept "
"only what corresponded to the second category. The first category therefore "
@@ -806,9 +547,6 @@
# type: Content of: <div><p>
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Copyright © 2007, [-2008, 2014-] {+2021+} Free Software Foundation,
-# | Inc.
-#| msgid "Copyright © 2007, 2008, 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
msgid "Copyright © 2007, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
msgstr "Copyright © 2007, 2013, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/licenses gplv3-the-program.fr.html gplv3-th...,
GNUN <=