[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy copyright-and-globalization.es.h...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy copyright-and-globalization.es.h... |
|
Date: |
Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:07:19 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 21/10/15 05:07:19
Modified files:
philosophy : copyright-and-globalization.es.html
philosophy/po : copyright-and-globalization.es-en.html
copyright-and-globalization.es.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/copyright-and-globalization.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.41&r2=1.42
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/copyright-and-globalization.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/copyright-and-globalization.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.37&r2=1.38
Patches:
Index: copyright-and-globalization.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/copyright-and-globalization.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.41
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -b -r1.41 -r1.42
--- copyright-and-globalization.es.html 12 Sep 2021 10:34:32 -0000 1.41
+++ copyright-and-globalization.es.html 15 Oct 2021 09:07:19 -0000 1.42
@@ -21,8 +21,7 @@
<div class="infobox">
<p>Lo que sigue es una transcripción corregida de la conferencia dictada en el
<abbr title="Massachusetts Institute of Technology">MIT</abbr> durante el
-<cite>Communications Forum</cite>, el jueves 19 de abril de 2001, de 17:00 a
-19:00.</p>
+<cite>Communications Forum</cite>, el jueves 19 de abril de 2001.</p>
</div>
<hr class="thin" />
@@ -34,12 +33,10 @@
entendido como un personaje carismático de una parábola bÃblica (especie de
anécdota o lección del Antiguo Testamento). «ImagÃnate —me
dijo—
un Moisés o un JeremÃas... mejor un JeremÃas». Y yo respondÃ: «Bien, eso
es
-muy admirable».</p>
-<p>
-Suena maravilloso. Confirma mi sensación acerca del tipo de contribución que
-ha hecho al mundo. «Entonces, ¿por qué no quieres compartir el estrado con
-él?» Su respuesta: «Como JeremÃas o Moisés, él simplemente me
-apabullarÃa. No querrÃa aparecer en el mismo panel que él, pero si me
+muy admirable». Suena maravilloso. Confirma mi sensación acerca del tipo de
+contribución que ha hecho al mundo. «Entonces, ¿por qué no quieres
compartir
+el estrado con él?». Su respuesta: «Como JeremÃas o Moisés, él
simplemente
+me apabullarÃa. No querrÃa aparecer en el mismo panel que él, pero si me
pidieras que nombre a cinco personas vivas en el mundo que realmente nos
hayan ayudado a todos nosotros, Richard Stallman serÃa una de ellas».</p>
<p>
@@ -74,14 +71,14 @@
<p>
Bien, ¿qué quiere decir eso? ¿DeberÃamos ser libres de copiarlo y
modificarlo? Si compro un micrófono, nadie me va a impedir modificarlo. Y
-copiarlo... nadie tiene un copiador de micrófonos. Fuera de Viaje a las
-Estrellas, esas cosas no existen. Puede ser que algún dÃa haya analizadores
-y ensambladores nanotecnológicos, y entonces estas cuestiones de si se es
-libre o no de hacer copias realmente adquirirán importancia. Veremos
-empresas agroindustriales intentando impedir que la gente copie alimentos, y
-eso se va a convertir en una cuestión polÃtica de primer orden; si es que
-esa capacidad tecnológica llega a existir. No sé si será asÃ, es solo
-especulación.</p>
+copiarlo... nadie tiene un copiador de micrófonos. Fuera de <cite>Star
+Trek</cite>, esas cosas no existen. Puede ser que algún dÃa haya
+analizadores y ensambladores nanotecnológicos, y entonces estas cuestiones
+de si se es libre o no de hacer copias realmente adquirirán
+importancia. Veremos empresas agroindustriales intentando impedir que la
+gente copie alimentos, y eso se va a convertir en una cuestión polÃtica de
+primer orden; si es que esa capacidad tecnológica llega a existir. No sé si
+será asÃ, es solo especulación.</p>
<p>
Pero para otros tipos de información se puede traer el asunto a colación,
porque cualquier clase de información que pueda ser almacenada en una
@@ -567,10 +564,10 @@
trabajos, en cualquier grado que sea.</p>
<p>
Permitir el copiado textual no comercial significa que el copyright ya no
-tendrá que entrometerse en el hogar de cada uno. Se vuelve una regulación
-industrial otra vez, fácil de hacer cumplir e indolora. Ya no requiera
-castigos draconianos e informantes en pos de su cumplimiento. Entonces
-obtenemos la mayor parte del beneficio —y evitamos la mayor parte del
+tendrá que entrometerse en el hogar de cada uno. Se convierte de nuevo en
+una regulación industrial, fácil de hacer cumplir e indolora. Ya no
+requerirá castigos draconianos e informantes en pos de su cumplimiento. AsÃ
+obtenemos el mayor beneficio —y evitamos la mayor parte del
horror— del actual sistema.</p>
<p>
La tercera categorÃa de trabajos son los trabajos estéticos o de
@@ -1315,7 +1312,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/09/12 10:34:32 $
+$Date: 2021/10/15 09:07:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/copyright-and-globalization.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/copyright-and-globalization.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- po/copyright-and-globalization.es-en.html 20 Sep 2021 10:32:32 -0000
1.17
+++ po/copyright-and-globalization.es-en.html 15 Oct 2021 09:07:19 -0000
1.18
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@
<div class="infobox">
<p>The following is an edited transcript from a speech given
at <abbr title="Massachusetts Institute of Technology">MIT</abbr> in
-the Communications Forum on Thursday, April 19, 2001 from 5:00pm -
-7:00pm</p>
+the Communications Forum on Thursday, April 19, 2001.</p>
</div>
<hr class="thin" />
@@ -30,8 +29,7 @@
biblical parable—a kind of Old Testament anecdote-lesson.
“Imagine,” he said, “a Moses or a Jeremiah—better
a Jeremiah.” And I said, “Well, that's very
-admirable.”</p>
-<p>
+admirable.
That sounds wonderful. It confirms my sense of the kind of
contribution he has made to the world. Then why are you reluctant to
share the podium with him?” His answer: “Like Jeremiah or
@@ -72,7 +70,7 @@
Well, what does that mean? Should you be free to copy it and change
it? Well, as for changing it, if you buy the microphone, nobody is
going to stop you from changing it. And as for copying it, nobody has
-a microphone copier. Outside of “Star Trek,” those things
+a microphone copier. Outside of <cite>Star Trek</cite>, those things
don't exist. Maybe some day there'll be nanotechnological analyzers
and assemblers, and it really will be possible to copy a physical
object, and then these issues of whether you're free to do that will
@@ -338,7 +336,7 @@
<p>
The U.S. though is not the first country to make a priority of this.
The Soviet Union treated it as very important. There this
-unauthorized copying and redistribution was known as Samizdat and to
+unauthorized copying and redistribution was known as <i>samizdat</i> and to
stamp it out, they developed a series of methods: First, guards
watching every piece of copying equipment to check what people were
copying to prevent forbidden copying. Second, harsh punishments for
@@ -552,19 +550,19 @@
the only thing that people really need to be allowed to do.</p>
<p>
The next question is: Should people have the right to do commercial
-verbatim copying? Or is non-commercial enough? You see, these are
+verbatim copying? Or is noncommercial enough? You see, these are
two different activities we can distinguish, so that we can consider
-the questions separately—the right to do non-commercial
+the questions separately—the right to do noncommercial
verbatim copying and the right to do commercial verbatim copying.
Well, it might be a good compromise policy to have copyright cover
commercial verbatim copying but allow everyone the right to do
-non-commercial verbatim copying. This way, the copyright on the
+noncommercial verbatim copying. This way, the copyright on the
commercial verbatim copying, as well as on all modified versions—only
the author could approve a modified version—would
still provide the same revenue stream that it provides now to fund the
writing of these works, to whatever extent it does.</p>
<p>
-By allowing the non-commercial verbatim copying, it means the
+By allowing the noncommercial verbatim copying, it means the
copyright no longer has to intrude into everybody's home. It becomes
an industrial regulation again, easy to enforce and painless, no
longer requiring draconian punishments and informers for the sake of
@@ -630,7 +628,7 @@
public in the name of the authors and musicians are giving those
authors and musicians the shaft all the time.</p>
<p>
-I recommend you read Courtney Love's article in “Salon”
+I recommend you read Courtney Love's article in <cite>Salon</cite>
magazine, an article about pirates that plan to use musicians' work
without paying them. These pirates are the record companies that pay
musicians 4% of the sales figures, on the average. Of course, the
@@ -878,7 +876,7 @@
<p>
<b>STALLMAN</b>: No. That's not what I proposed. Remember, I'm proposing
that there should be copyright covering commercial distribution and
-permitting only verbatim redistribution non-commercially. So anyone
+permitting only verbatim redistribution noncommercially. So anyone
who modified it to put in a pointer to his website, instead of a
pointer to the real author's website, would still be infringing the
copyright and could be sued exactly as he could be sued today.</p>
@@ -1088,7 +1086,7 @@
care to lay out for us?</p>
<p>
<b>STALLMAN</b>: Well, the idea of giving everyone permission for
-non-commercial verbatim copying of two kinds of works, certainly, may
+noncommercial verbatim copying of two kinds of works, certainly, may
be thought of as extending what fair use is. It's bigger than what's
fair use currently. If your idea is that the public trades away
certain freedoms to get more progress, then you can draw the line at
@@ -1100,18 +1098,18 @@
So, for example, copyright does not prevent us from singing Christmas
carols seasonally but it prevents the public performance. And I'm
wondering if it might be useful to think about instead of expanding
-fair use to unlimited, non-commercial, verbatim copying, to something
+fair use to unlimited, noncommercial, verbatim copying, to something
less than that but more than the present concept of fair use.</p>
<p>
<b>STALLMAN</b>: I used to think that that might be enough, and then Napster
convinced me otherwise because Napster is used by its users for
-non-commercial, verbatim redistribution. The Napster server, itself,
+noncommercial, verbatim redistribution. The Napster server, itself,
is a commercial activity but the people who are actually putting
-things up are doing so non-commercially, and they could have done so
+things up are doing so noncommercially, and they could have done so
on their websites just as easily. The tremendous excitement about,
interest in, and use of Napster shows that that's very useful. So I'm
convinced now that people should have the right to publicly
-non-commercially, redistributed, verbatim copies of everything.</p>
+noncommercially, redistributed, verbatim copies of everything.</p>
<p>
<b>QUESTION</b>: One analogy that was recently suggested to me for the
whole Napster question was the analogy of the public library. I
@@ -1322,7 +1320,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/20 10:32:32 $
+$Date: 2021/10/15 09:07:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/copyright-and-globalization.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/copyright-and-globalization.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- po/copyright-and-globalization.es.po 15 Oct 2021 08:45:55 -0000
1.37
+++ po/copyright-and-globalization.es.po 15 Oct 2021 09:07:19 -0000
1.38
@@ -45,20 +45,6 @@
"<abbr title=\"Massachusetts Institute of Technology\">MIT</abbr> durante el "
"<cite>Communications Forum</cite>, el jueves 19 de abril de 2001."
-# | <b>DAVID THORBURN, moderator</b>: Our speaker today, Richard Stallman, is
-# | a legendary figure in the computing world, and my experience in trying to
-# | find a respondent to share the podium with him was instructive. One
-# | distinguished MIT professor told me that Stallman needs to be understood
-# | as a charismatic figure in a biblical parable—a kind of Old
-# | Testament anecdote-lesson. “Imagine,” he said, “a Moses
-# | or a Jeremiah—better a Jeremiah.” And I said, “Well,
-# | that's very [-admirable.”-] {+admirable. That sounds wonderful. It
-# | confirms my sense of the kind of contribution he has made to the world.
-# | Then why are you reluctant to share the podium with him?” His
-# | answer: “Like Jeremiah or Moses, he would simply overwhelm me. I
-# | won't appear on the same panel him, but if you asked me to name five
-# | people alive in the world who have truly helped us all, Richard Stallman
-# | would be one of them.”+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"<b>DAVID THORBURN, moderator</b>: Our speaker today, Richard Stallman, is a "
@@ -155,17 +141,6 @@
"Y, por supuesto, algunos hacÃan preguntas insensatas, como por ejemplo: "
"«¿DeberÃa ser libre el hardware?», «¿Este micrófono deberÃa ser
libre?»."
-# | Well, what does that mean? Should you be free to copy it and change it?
-# | Well, as for changing it, if you buy the microphone, nobody is going to
-# | stop you from changing it. And as for copying it, nobody has a microphone
-# | copier. Outside of [-“Star Trek,”-] {+<cite>Star
-# | Trek</cite>,+} those things don't exist. Maybe some day there'll be
-# | nanotechnological analyzers and assemblers, and it really will be possible
-# | to copy a physical object, and then these issues of whether you're free to
-# | do that will start being really important. We'll see agribusiness
-# | companies trying to stop people from copying food, and that will become a
-# | major political issue, if that technological capability will ever exist.
-# | I don't know if it will; it's just speculation at this point.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Well, what does that mean? Should you be free to copy it and change it? "
@@ -735,20 +710,6 @@
"lÃder mundial en el intento de impedir que el público distribuya
información "
"que ha sido publicada."
-# | The U.S. though is not the first country to make a priority of this. The
-# | Soviet Union treated it as very important. There this unauthorized
-# | copying and redistribution was known as [-Samizdat-] {+<i>samizdat</i>+}
-# | and to stamp it out, they developed a series of methods: First, guards
-# | watching every piece of copying equipment to check what people were
-# | copying to prevent forbidden copying. Second, harsh punishments for
-# | anyone caught doing forbidden copying. You could be sent to Siberia.
-# | Third, soliciting informers, asking everyone to rat on their neighbors and
-# | co-workers to the information police. Fourth, collective
-# | responsibility—You! You're going to watch that group! If I catch any
-# | of them doing forbidden copying, you are going to prison. So watch them
-# | hard. And, fifth, propaganda, starting in childhood to convince everyone
-# | that only a horrible enemy of the people would ever do this forbidden
-# | copying.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"The U.S. though is not the first country to make a priority of this. The "
@@ -1217,18 +1178,6 @@
"hacer copias textuales."
# FALTA REVISAR
-# | The next question is: Should people have the right to do commercial
-# | verbatim copying? Or is non[---]commercial enough? You see, these are two
-# | different activities we can distinguish, so that we can consider the
-# | questions separately—the right to do non[---]commercial verbatim
-# | copying and the right to do commercial verbatim copying. Well, it might
-# | be a good compromise policy to have copyright cover commercial verbatim
-# | copying but allow everyone the right to do non[---]commercial verbatim
-# | copying. This way, the copyright on the commercial verbatim copying, as
-# | well as on all modified versions—only the author could approve a
-# | modified version—would still provide the same revenue stream that it
-# | provides now to fund the writing of these works, to whatever extent it
-# | does.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"The next question is: Should people have the right to do commercial verbatim "
@@ -1257,12 +1206,6 @@
"cualquier grado que sea."
# FALTA REVISAR
-# | By allowing the non[---]commercial verbatim copying, it means the
-# | copyright no longer has to intrude into everybody's home. It becomes an
-# | industrial regulation again, easy to enforce and painless, no longer
-# | requiring draconian punishments and informers for the sake of its
-# | enforcement. So we get most of the benefit—and avoid most of the
-# | horror—of the current system.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"By allowing the noncommercial verbatim copying, it means the copyright no "
@@ -1411,14 +1354,6 @@
"dando migajas a esos autores y músicos, todo el tiempo."
# FALTA REVISAR
-# | I recommend you read Courtney Love's article in [-“Salon”-]
-# | {+<cite>Salon</cite>+} magazine, an article about pirates that plan to use
-# | musicians' work without paying them. These pirates are the record
-# | companies that pay musicians 4% of the sales figures, on the average. Of
-# | course, the very successful musicians have more clout. They get more than
-# | 4% of their large sales figures, which means that the great run of
-# | musicians who have a record contract get less than 4% of their small sales
-# | figures.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"I recommend you read Courtney Love's article in <cite>Salon</cite> magazine, "
@@ -1951,12 +1886,6 @@
"se le pide que haga donaciones voluntarias, ¿no es susceptible de abuso por "
"parte de la gente mediante el plagio?"
-# | <b>STALLMAN</b>: No. That's not what I proposed. Remember, I'm proposing
-# | that there should be copyright covering commercial distribution and
-# | permitting only verbatim redistribution non[---]commercially. So anyone
-# | who modified it to put in a pointer to his website, instead of a pointer
-# | to the real author's website, would still be infringing the copyright and
-# | could be sued exactly as he could be sued today.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"<b>STALLMAN</b>: No. That's not what I proposed. Remember, I'm proposing "
@@ -2419,13 +2348,6 @@
"presentarnos?"
# FALTA REVISAR
-# | <b>STALLMAN</b>: Well, the idea of giving everyone permission for
-# | non[---]commercial verbatim copying of two kinds of works, certainly, may
-# | be thought of as extending what fair use is. It's bigger than what's fair
-# | use currently. If your idea is that the public trades away certain
-# | freedoms to get more progress, then you can draw the line at various,
-# | different places. Which freedoms does the public trade away and which
-# | freedoms does the public keep?
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"<b>STALLMAN</b>: Well, the idea of giving everyone permission for "
@@ -2445,13 +2367,6 @@
"conserva?"
# FALTA REVISAR
-# | <b>QUESTION</b>: To extend the conversation for just a moment, in certain
-# | entertainment fields, we have the concept of a public presentation. So,
-# | for example, copyright does not prevent us from singing Christmas carols
-# | seasonally but it prevents the public performance. And I'm wondering if
-# | it might be useful to think about instead of expanding fair use to
-# | unlimited, non[---]commercial, verbatim copying, to something less than
-# | that but more than the present concept of fair use.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"<b>QUESTION</b>: To extend the conversation for just a moment, in certain "
@@ -2471,15 +2386,6 @@
"<cite>fair use</cite>."
# FALTA REVISAR
-# | <b>STALLMAN</b>: I used to think that that might be enough, and then
-# | Napster convinced me otherwise because Napster is used by its users for
-# | non[---]commercial, verbatim redistribution. The Napster server, itself,
-# | is a commercial activity but the people who are actually putting things up
-# | are doing so non[---]commercially, and they could have done so on their
-# | websites just as easily. The tremendous excitement about, interest in,
-# | and use of Napster shows that that's very useful. So I'm convinced now
-# | that people should have the right to publicly non[---]commercially,
-# | redistributed, verbatim copies of everything.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"<b>STALLMAN</b>: I used to think that that might be enough, and then Napster "
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy copyright-and-globalization.es.h...,
GNUN <=