www/philosophy reevaluating-copyright.html rms-...

[Therese Godefroy]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Therese Godefroy <th_g> 21/10/03 04:54:51

Modified files:
        philosophy     : reevaluating-copyright.html 
                         rms-comment-longs-article.html 
        philosophy/sco : sco-preemption.html sco-without-fear.html 

Log message:
        Replace &thinsp; with &#8239; (non-breaking).

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/reevaluating-copyright.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.38&r2=1.39
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/rms-comment-longs-article.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/sco-preemption.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/sco-without-fear.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29

Patches:
Index: reevaluating-copyright.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/reevaluating-copyright.html,v
retrieving revision 1.38
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -b -r1.38 -r1.39
--- reevaluating-copyright.html 2 Oct 2021 08:40:06 -0000       1.38
+++ reevaluating-copyright.html 3 Oct 2021 08:54:50 -0000       1.39
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 <h2>Reevaluating Copyright: The Public Must Prevail</h2>
 
 <address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
-Stallman</a>&thinsp;<a href="#ft1"><sup>[1]</sup></a></address>
+Stallman</a>&#8239;<a href="#ft1"><sup>[1]</sup></a></address>
 
 <p>The legal world is aware that digital information technology poses
 &ldquo;problems for copyright,&rdquo; but has not traced these
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 copyright for CD recordings of their music.</p>
 
 <p>Barlow did not analyze the reasons for treating these media
-differently, and later Gary Glisson&thinsp;<a href="#ft4"><sup>[4]</sup></a> 
criticized
+differently, and later Gary Glisson&#8239;<a href="#ft4"><sup>[4]</sup></a> 
criticized
 Barlow's idea that the Internet is inexplicably unique and unlike
 anything else in the world. He argued that we should be able to
 determine the implications of the Internet for copyright policy by the
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 <p>Barlow suggested that our intuitions based on physical objects as
 property do not transfer to information as property because
 information is &ldquo;abstract.&rdquo; As Steven
-Winter&thinsp;<a href="#ft5"><sup>[5]</sup></a> remarked, abstract property 
has existed
+Winter&#8239;<a href="#ft5"><sup>[5]</sup></a> remarked, abstract property has 
existed
 for centuries. Shares in a company, commodity futures, and even paper
 money, are forms of property that are more or less abstract.  Barlow
 and others who argue that information should be free do not reject
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@
 of collective responsibility, whereby a computer owner is required to
 monitor and control the activities of all users, on pain of being
 punished for actions in which he was not a participant but merely
-failed to actively prevent. Tim Sloan&thinsp;<a href="#ft8"><sup>[8]</sup></a> 
pointed
+failed to actively prevent. Tim Sloan&#8239;<a href="#ft8"><sup>[8]</sup></a> 
pointed
 out that this gives copyright owners a privileged status not accorded
 to anyone else who might claim to be damaged by a computer user; for
 example, no one proposes to punish the computer owner if he fails
@@ -253,12 +253,12 @@
 <p>This error is so ingrained today that people who oppose new
 copyright powers feel the need to do so by arguing that even authors
 and publishers may be hurt by them. Thus, James
-Boyle&thinsp;<a href="#ft12"><sup>[12]</sup></a> explains how a
+Boyle&#8239;<a href="#ft12"><sup>[12]</sup></a> explains how a
 strict <a href="#later-2">intellectual property system</a> can
 interfere with writing new works. Jessica
-Litman&thinsp;<a href="#ft13"><sup>[13]</sup></a> cites the copyright shelters 
which
+Litman&#8239;<a href="#ft13"><sup>[13]</sup></a> cites the copyright shelters 
which
 historically allowed many new media to become popular. Pamela
-Samuelson&thinsp;<a href="#ft14"><sup>[14]</sup></a> warns that the White 
Paper may
+Samuelson&#8239;<a href="#ft14"><sup>[14]</sup></a> warns that the White Paper 
may
 block the development of &ldquo;third-wave&rdquo; information
 industries by locking the world into the &ldquo;second-wave&rdquo;
 economic model that fit the age of the printing press.</p>
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/10/02 08:40:06 $
+$Date: 2021/10/03 08:54:50 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: rms-comment-longs-article.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/rms-comment-longs-article.html,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- rms-comment-longs-article.html      2 Oct 2021 08:23:03 -0000       1.25
+++ rms-comment-longs-article.html      3 Oct 2021 08:54:50 -0000       1.26
@@ -19,11 +19,11 @@
 <div class="introduction"><p>
 The ideas of the free software movement are compatible with
 social-democratic (US liberal) views and with laissez-faire (US
-libertarian&thinsp;<a href="#ft1"><sup>[1]</sup></a>) views.
+libertarian&#8239;<a href="#ft1"><sup>[1]</sup></a>) views.
 </p></div>
 
 <p>Free software is a matter of freedom.  From our point of view,
-precisely which legal mechanism&thinsp;<sup><a href="#ft2">[2]</a></sup>
+precisely which legal mechanism&#8239;<sup><a href="#ft2">[2]</a></sup>
 is used to deny software users their
 freedom is just an implementation detail.  Whether it is done with
 copyright, with contracts, or in some other way, it is wrong to deny
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/10/02 08:23:03 $
+$Date: 2021/10/03 08:54:50 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: sco/sco-preemption.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/sco/sco-preemption.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- sco/sco-preemption.html     2 Oct 2021 08:28:56 -0000       1.21
+++ sco/sco-preemption.html     3 Oct 2021 08:54:50 -0000       1.22
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 <h2>SCO Scuttles Sense, Claiming GPL Invalidity</h2>
 
 <address class="byline">by Eben
-Moglen&thinsp;<a href="#moglen"><sup>[*]</sup></a></address>
+Moglen&#8239;<a href="#moglen"><sup>[*]</sup></a></address>
 
 <p><i>Monday 18 August 2003</i></p>
 
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/10/02 08:28:56 $
+$Date: 2021/10/03 08:54:50 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: sco/sco-without-fear.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/sco/sco-without-fear.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- sco/sco-without-fear.html   2 Oct 2021 08:44:18 -0000       1.28
+++ sco/sco-without-fear.html   3 Oct 2021 08:54:51 -0000       1.29
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 <h2>SCO: Without Fear and Without Research</h2>
 
 <address class="byline">by Eben
-Moglen&thinsp;<a href="#moglen"><sup>[*]</sup></a></address>
+Moglen&#8239;<a href="#moglen"><sup>[*]</sup></a></address>
 
 <p><i>Monday 24 November 2003</i></p>
 
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/10/02 08:44:18 $
+$Date: 2021/10/03 08:54:51 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>