Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates

[Vasilakes, Keith]

Believe me, I won't complain either way :)

Having the code notice F_CPU would be way cool

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 10:55 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates

As Vasilakes, Keith wrote:

> Because if I see 'calibrate' I think I'm expecting the osc freq to
> be fixed to the design value.

As long as it's well documented, I don't see much problems.  But it's
fine with me to call it "adjust" if you think that's more descriptive.
I wouldn't want to have two routines though, just adjusting it to
F_CPU is fine I think.

Just discussed a little with Axel, it could even go further, and
adjust the clock prescaler to the appropriate value.  Thus, you
can #define F_CPU 3.686E6, and the adjustment routine notices it
has to set the prescaler to 2. ;-)

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)