[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Taler] "misattribute"
|
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Taler] "misattribute" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 7 Sep 2022 08:23:13 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 |
On 9/7/22 07:45, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
>
> There is a pervasive use of the (incorrect) "missattribute"
> (note two 's' chars) instead of the (correct) "misattribute"
> (one 's' char) in the exchange codebase and probably elsewhere
> (i haven't checked).
>
> Normally, i would simply ‘s/miss/mis/g’, but i see that the
> wrong spelling is also present in non-documentation, non-comment
> contexts (i.e., in code contexts, e.g., as a field name). I
> feel a bit more leery about breaking things in those contexts.
>
> So, what do we want to do here?
> (a) Leave as is.
> (b) Change only non-code contexts.
> (c) Do ‘s/miss/mis/g’ (and fix any breakage).
Definitively (c).