[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online
From: |
Jeff Johnson |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:22:04 -0400 |
On Aug 22, 2010, at 11:13 AM, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP wrote:
> Please accept my sincere apology. I did not mean to offend. I have never
> received a refusal to sign a message indicating ownership of a private key
> and it raised a red flag. Since there has been no indication from the list
> that this was an appropriate step to take, I will avoid publishing such
> issues and attempt instead to resolve them privately.
Well as one who was also surprised at your peering policy (although
I understood perfectly once you explained), you might try
to describe the SKS server peering policy you are obliged to
work with up front (and in a accessible web page) just to expedite
the explanations.
There's nothing whatsoever wrong with your SKS peering policy imho, just
it surprised ( at least me) a bit, necessitating an explanation involving
some subtle interpretations of what "trust" means.
If you add a policy description of YOUR "trust" needs for SKS peering, its
obvious
(to me anyways) why you wish a signed message.
hth just trying for a positive suggestion
73 de Jeff
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP, 2010/08/22
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, Christoph Anton Mitterer, 2010/08/22
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP, 2010/08/22
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, John Clizbe, 2010/08/22
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP, 2010/08/22
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, Christoph Anton Mitterer, 2010/08/22
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP, 2010/08/22
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, Christoph Anton Mitterer, 2010/08/22
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP, 2010/08/22
Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online, Arnold, 2010/08/22