sketch-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Skencil for Windows packaged


From: Joonas Paalasmaa
Subject: Re: Skencil for Windows packaged
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:27:23 GMT

Hi,

Actually Skencil can be built with MinGW without any rint hacks. I
submitted a patch that makes it easy to develop Skencil on Windows.
When that patch is applied to CVS I think that we should announce the
Windows version. Here is the news item.
--- mainpage.sgml.old   Tue Nov 18 20:12:27 2003
+++ mainpage.sgml       Tue Nov 18 20:24:32 2003
@@ -10,6 +10,14 @@
<p>
<newslist>
+       <newsitem date="2003-11-18">
+         Windows version available
+         <newsbody>
+           Joonas Paalasmaa has done a
+           <href url="http://speedloop2000.com/skencil/";>Windows
+           version</> of Skencil's development branch.
+       </newsitem>
+
      <newsitem date="2003-11-01">
        New Gallery Images
<newsbody>


- Joonas
Joonas Paalasmaa writes:
I think that we should make Skencil's CVS version buildable on Windows before announcing the Windows binary. Thus people can start doing Skencil development on Windows immediately. I have created a Distutils setup.py file that takes care of building the extensions and creating the windows installer. Should we try to get rid of the current non-Distutils setup.py? I addition, the rint problem has to be solved somehow.
Using the define for Windows is one solution:
#define rint(i) ( (i-floor(i)<0.5) ? floor(i) : ceil(i) )
It is, however, not the best solutions, because it does not conform to
the rint definition, and because i is evaluated twice. Bernhard Reiter writes:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 08:55:05PM +0200, Joonas Paalasmaa wrote:
Now that we have a development version working on Windows, shouldn't we
somehow advertise it on Skencil's web site?
Yes, we should. The fastest way to get this done, is to produce a patch so that Bernhard or myself can directly drop it in, when we have a couple of minutes time.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]