[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #548720] Explanation about pe
From: |
Mario Castelán Castro |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #548720] Explanation about permissive licences? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:08:55 -0600 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
February 10th 2010 for address@hidden copy to
address@hidden thread "Explanation about permissive
licences?".
>(Is some savannah applicant doing this complicated
>multiple-licenses-in-a-file stuff?)
Not currently, but in the near future I wish to adapt a small RBSD
library as a part of a larger project. I would prefer to release my
changes under the GPL. That project, if developed, will be sumitted
to savannah.
>Of course, the simplest (and best) general approach is to keep each
>file under a single license, and if work is done under a different
>license, put it in a different file. That's what we always try to do
>in GNU.
Yeah, thanks by advice, or maybe I put the markers between GPL and
RBSD code.
Why GNU don't mix licences in the same file?, Is some another problem
for not do so?
Thanks and excuse for my delayed respose karl, I was too busy before
this.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREIAAYFAktzkMEACgkQZ4DA0TLic4ha7gCfXWTh2D9VMJhJa7LPfz2volpE
wU0AniVTEx2XvCesF1TUVUjhmDHd3l8X
=iTN9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----