Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Documentating hosting requirements

[Sebastian Gerhardt]

On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 10:21 +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > What I am hoping for is something that the reviewer can more easily
> > refer to. In order to fix it in my strategy, that page needs to be
> > precise, restructured, and simplified. So the document I sent was
> > intended to help fix it.
> 
> The main issue I see with this numbered lists of items, is that
> there's no explanation.  "Don't use open source" -> why? 

A numbered list doesn't rule out explanations IMHO.
We could place a link called "Why?" or "Reasoning" right beside every
requirement. 


> It's more important that people understand our values than just obey
> the requirements.

I agree, but can't we achieve this by putting a preamble on top, where
we set the mood?