Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: savannah shell access?

[Sylvain Beucler]

> > One small measure that may help avoid casual or inadvertent
> > interference: leave each working directory "chmod 0", and have
> > the git update hook do "chmod 755 ...", do its job, then "chmod 0"
> > to re-protect it.
> 
> I think this is not so good.  I understand how it would make it more
> difficult to have accidental crosstalk between projects happen by
> making the windows of vulnerability smaller, like a time-lock safe.
> But I think that if there is a concern about interference that the
> process either should stand on its own or not.  Withing being able to
> completely verbalize why, I think that doing this type of door opening
> and closing just "feels" like less than a good thing to do.

That's my feeling as well :)

-- 
Sylvain