[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:13:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 10:07:04PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
>
> Howdy,
>
> > Did you repack the repository somehow? I found it repacked after the
> > import, and I don't remember doing so :)
>
> No :)
> I did this:
>
> git-push ssh+git://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/gnulib master:refs/heads/master
<ShadeHawk> Beuc: with new git, if pack file downloaded cross some
threshold (also I think for push) it is stored thickened, instead of
exploded into loose objects on receiving
Nifty :)
We'll see if that works also when lots of small commits produce a lot
of objects.
--
Sylvain
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/11/28
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/28
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/11/28
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Bob Proulx, 2006/11/29
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/29
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/11/29
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/29
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?,
Sylvain Beucler <=
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/29