[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL
From: |
Francesco Poli |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:06:46 +0100 |
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:53:57 +0100 Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be wiser to fix the license *first* and only *then* ask
> > for compatibility?
>
> Better ask early,
People who think that the GFDL has unsolved issues that should be fixed
are generally not willing to release their own works under the GFDL or
in a GFDL-compatible way...
> and it depends on whether the known issues of a
> license outweight the issues of other solutions, or not.
Are you thinking about releasing a manual under the GNU GPL v2, when you
say "other solutions"?
If this is the case, I'm not aware of any significant issue with that
scenario.
GFDL'd manuals, instead, cause many many problems...
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpAbnVtGjN_q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Sanjoy Mahajan, 2006/02/11
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/02/12
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, MJ Ray, 2006/02/14
- Message not available
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, MJ Ray, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, David Turner, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, MJ Ray, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, David Turner, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Francesco Poli, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/02/16
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL,
Francesco Poli <=
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Francesco Poli, 2006/02/15