[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:50:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
> The GFDL is a terrible license. People can add invariant sections and
> balkanize the derivative works, defeating the point of copyleft. For
> example, suppose a clever Bush supporter rewrites the documentation in
> XML and adds an invariant section denying global warming or praising
> 'intelligent design'. I might like to use the XML rewrite, but I don't
> want to include their rubbish about global warming. So now the project
> has forked with no easy way to bring it back.
Hi,
I don't think such a section would be acceptable. What you can add as
an invariant section is pretty limited and can't be anything one want.
--
Sylvain
- [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Sanjoy Mahajan, 2006/02/11
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL,
Sylvain Beucler <=
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, MJ Ray, 2006/02/14
- Message not available
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, MJ Ray, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, David Turner, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, MJ Ray, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, David Turner, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Francesco Poli, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/02/16
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Francesco Poli, 2006/02/16
- Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GFDL, Francesco Poli, 2006/02/15