[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/4] hw/s390x: Alias @dump-skeys -> @dump-s390-skey and depre
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/4] hw/s390x: Alias @dump-skeys -> @dump-s390-skey and deprecate |
Date: |
Fri, 31 May 2024 14:02:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) |
* Thomas Huth (thuth@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 30/05/2024 09.45, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > We are trying to unify all qemu-system-FOO to a single binary.
> > In order to do that we need to remove QAPI target specific code.
> >
> > @dump-skeys is only available on qemu-system-s390x. This series
> > rename it as @dump-s390-skey, making it available on other
> > binaries. We take care of backward compatibility via deprecation.
> >
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (4):
> > hw/s390x: Introduce the @dump-s390-skeys QMP command
> > hw/s390x: Introduce the 'dump_s390_skeys' HMP command
> > hw/s390x: Deprecate the HMP 'dump_skeys' command
> > hw/s390x: Deprecate the QMP @dump-skeys command
>
> Why do we have to rename the command? Just for the sake of it? I think
> renaming HMP commands is maybe ok, but breaking the API in QMP is something
> you should consider twice.
>
> And even if we decide to rename ... maybe we should discuss whether it makes
> sense to come up with a generic command instead: As far as I know, ARM also
> has something similar, called MTE. Maybe we also want to dump MTE keys one
> day? So the new command should maybe be called "dump-memory-keys" instead?
I think there are at least two different concepts; but I agree it would be
nice to keep a single command for matching concepts across different
architectures;
I can't say I know the details of any, but:
a) Page table things - I think x86 PKRU/PKEY (???) is a page table thing
where pages marked a special way are associated with keys.
That sounds similar to what the skeys are???
b) Upper bit things - where you steal a few bits from the virtual address
and then use that to associate some security; I think that's closer
to what MTE is isn't it?
I'm not sure the two fit in the same command.
Dave
> Or should it maybe rather be an option to the existing "dump-guest-memory"
> command instead?
>
> Thomas
>
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
- [PATCH 0/4] hw/s390x: Alias @dump-skeys -> @dump-s390-skey and deprecate, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/05/30
- [PATCH 1/4] hw/s390x: Introduce the @dump-s390-skeys QMP command, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/05/30
- [PATCH 2/4] hw/s390x: Introduce the 'dump_s390_skeys' HMP command, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/05/30
- [PATCH 3/4] hw/s390x: Deprecate the HMP 'dump_skeys' command, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/05/30
- [PATCH 4/4] hw/s390x: Deprecate the QMP @dump-skeys command, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/05/30
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] hw/s390x: Alias @dump-skeys -> @dump-s390-skey and deprecate, Anton Johansson, 2024/05/30
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] hw/s390x: Alias @dump-skeys -> @dump-s390-skey and deprecate, Thomas Huth, 2024/05/31
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] hw/s390x: Alias @dump-skeys -> @dump-s390-skey and deprecate,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=