qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 04/10] hw/intc/arm_gic: Rename 'first_cpu' argument


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] hw/intc/arm_gic: Rename 'first_cpu' argument
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:31:27 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.0; emacs 29.0.90

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> writes:

> "hw/core/cpu.h" defines 'first_cpu' as QTAILQ_FIRST_RCU(&cpus).
>
> arm_gic_common_reset_irq_state() calls its second argument
> 'first_cpu', producing a build failure when "hw/core/cpu.h"
> is included:
>
>   hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c:238:68: warning: omitting the parameter name in a 
> function definition is a C2x extension [-Wc2x-extensions]
>     static inline void arm_gic_common_reset_irq_state(GICState *s, int 
> first_cpu,
>                                                                        ^
>   include/hw/core/cpu.h:451:26: note: expanded from macro 'first_cpu'
>     #define first_cpu        QTAILQ_FIRST_RCU(&cpus)
>                              ^
>
> KISS, rename the function argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
> index 9702197856..889327a8cf 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
> @@ -235,12 +235,13 @@ static void arm_gic_common_realize(DeviceState *dev, 
> Error **errp)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -static inline void arm_gic_common_reset_irq_state(GICState *s, int first_cpu,
> +static inline void arm_gic_common_reset_irq_state(GICState *s,
> +                                                  int
> first_cpu_index,

I'd have gone for a shorter name like cidx maybe, naming things is hard.

Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>


>                                                    int resetprio)
>  {
>      int i, j;
>  
> -    for (i = first_cpu; i < first_cpu + s->num_cpu; i++) {
> +    for (i = first_cpu_index; i < first_cpu_index + s->num_cpu; i++) {
>          if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
>              s->priority_mask[i] = 0xf0;
>          } else {


-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]