[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PULL 01/14] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
[PULL 01/14] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:44:50 +0100 |
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not
advertise it and its support facilities.
Fixes: c3347ed0d2ee ("s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility")
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201211105109.2913-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
index 42fe0bf4ca7a..5528acd08289 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
@@ -107,8 +107,45 @@ void s390_fill_feat_block(const S390FeatBitmap features,
S390FeatType type,
feat = find_next_bit(features, S390_FEAT_MAX, feat + 1);
}
- if (type == S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC134 && s390_is_pv()) {
+ if (!s390_is_pv()) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Some facilities are not available for CPUs in protected mode:
+ * - All SIE facilities because SIE is not available
+ * - DIAG318
+ *
+ * As VMs can move in and out of protected mode the CPU model
+ * doesn't protect us from that problem because it is only
+ * validated at the start of the VM.
+ */
+ switch (type) {
+ case S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CPU:
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_F2)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_SKEY)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_GPERE)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_SIIF)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_SIGPIF)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_IB)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_CEI)->bit, data);
+ break;
+ case S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CONF_CHAR:
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_GSLS)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_HPMA2)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_KSS)->bit, data);
+ break;
+ case S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CONF_CHAR_EXT:
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_64BSCAO)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_CMMA)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_PFMFI)->bit, data);
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_IBS)->bit, data);
+ break;
+ case S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC134:
clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_DIAG_318)->bit, data);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return;
}
}
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
index b5abff8befea..93d8744d29a3 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
@@ -239,8 +239,29 @@ bool s390_has_feat(S390Feat feat)
}
return 0;
}
- if (feat == S390_FEAT_DIAG_318 && s390_is_pv()) {
- return false;
+
+ if (s390_is_pv()) {
+ switch (feat) {
+ case S390_FEAT_DIAG_318:
+ case S390_FEAT_HPMA2:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_F2:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_SKEY:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_GPERE:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_SIIF:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_SIGPIF:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_IB:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_CEI:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_KSS:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_GSLS:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_64BSCAO:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_CMMA:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_PFMFI:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIE_IBS:
+ return false;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
}
return test_bit(feat, cpu->model->features);
}
--
2.26.2
- [PULL 00/14] s390x update, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 01/14] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests,
Cornelia Huck <=
- [PULL 02/14] MAINTAINERS: move my git tree to gitlab, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 03/14] qga/commands-posix: Send CCW address on s390x with the fsinfo data, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 06/14] target/s390x: Improve cc computation for SUBTRACT LOGICAL, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 04/14] target/s390x: Improve cc computation for ADD LOGICAL, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 05/14] target/s390x: Improve ADD LOGICAL WITH CARRY, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 07/14] target/s390x: Improve SUB LOGICAL WITH BORROW, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 08/14] tests/acceptance: test hot(un)plug of ccw devices, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 09/14] tests/acceptance: Extract the code to clear dmesg and wait for CRW reports, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 10/14] tests/acceptance: Test virtio-rng on s390 via /dev/hwrng, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22
- [PULL 11/14] tests/acceptance: Test the virtio-balloon device on s390x, Cornelia Huck, 2020/12/22