qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] hw/intc: sifive_plic: fix out-of-bound access of source_prio


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/intc: sifive_plic: fix out-of-bound access of source_priority array
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 12:59:04 +1000

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 2:59 AM Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> If the number of interrupt is not multiple of 32, PLIC will have
> out-of-bound access to source_priority array. Compute the number of
> interrupt in the last word to avoid this out-of-bound access of array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com>

Thanks!

Applied to riscv-to-apply.next

Alistair

> ---
>  hw/intc/sifive_plic.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> index c2dfacf028..1cf156cf85 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static uint32_t sifive_plic_claimed(SiFivePLICState *plic, 
> uint32_t addrid)
>      uint32_t max_irq = 0;
>      uint32_t max_prio = plic->target_priority[addrid];
>      int i, j;
> +    int num_irq_in_word = 32;
>
>      for (i = 0; i < plic->bitfield_words; i++) {
>          uint32_t pending_enabled_not_claimed =
> @@ -88,7 +89,16 @@ static uint32_t sifive_plic_claimed(SiFivePLICState *plic, 
> uint32_t addrid)
>              continue;
>          }
>
> -        for (j = 0; j < 32; j++) {
> +        if (i == (plic->bitfield_words - 1)) {
> +            /*
> +             * If plic->num_sources is not multiple of 32, num-of-irq in last
> +             * word is not 32. Compute the num-of-irq of last word to avoid
> +             * out-of-bound access of source_priority array.
> +             */
> +            num_irq_in_word = plic->num_sources - ((plic->bitfield_words - 
> 1) << 5);
> +        }
> +
> +        for (j = 0; j < num_irq_in_word; j++) {
>              int irq = (i << 5) + j;
>              uint32_t prio = plic->source_priority[irq];
>              int enabled = pending_enabled_not_claimed & (1 << j);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]