qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3] target/riscv: fix VS interrupts forwarding to HS


From: Jose Martins
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] target/riscv: fix VS interrupts forwarding to HS
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:14:59 +0100

Hello Zhiwei and Alistair,

I went for a middle-ground solution. I divided the patch into two: one
fixes the vs interrupt forwarding to the hypervisor, the other removes
the unnecessary force exception stuff. I just submitted the patch
series. I hope it's ok with you.

José

On Fri, 28 May 2021 at 01:36, LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/21 6:34 AM, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 1:45 AM Jose Martins <josemartins90@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >> VS interrupts (2, 6, 10) were not correctly forwarded to hs-mode when
> >> not delegated in hideleg (which was not being taken into account). This
> >> was mainly because hs level sie was not always considered enabled when
> >> it should. The spec states that "Interrupts for higher-privilege modes,
> >> y>x, are always globally enabled regardless of the setting of the global
> >> yIE bit for the higher-privilege mode." and also "For purposes of
> >> interrupt global enables, HS-mode is considered more privileged than
> >> VS-mode, and VS-mode is considered more privileged than VU-mode".
> >>
> >> These interrupts should be treated the same as any other kind of
> >> exception. Therefore, there is no need to "force an hs exception" as the
> >> current privilege level, the state of the global ie and of the
> >> delegation registers should be enough to route the interrupt to the
> >> appropriate privilege level in riscv_cpu_do_interrupt. Also, these
> >> interrupts never target m-mode, which is  guaranteed by the hardwiring
> >> of the corresponding bits in mideleg. The same is true for synchronous
> >> exceptions, specifically, guest page faults which must be hardwired in
> >> to zero hedeleg. As such the hs_force_except mechanism can be removed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jose Martins <josemartins90@gmail.com>
> > This looks right to me, but this was one of the most confusing parts
> > of the implementation. I also don't think the patch is too long as
> > it's mostly just deleting stuff.
> >
> > I don't fully understand your concerns Zhiwei, do you mind stating them 
> > again?
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> My main concern is the commit message is to complex.
>
> I also have a question why force hs exception in current code.
> Then we can give a brief commit message.
>
> Best Regards,
> Zhiwei
>
> >
> > Alistair
> >
> >> ---
> >> This version of the patch also removes the uneeded hs_force_except
> >> functions, variables and macro.
> >>
> >>   target/riscv/cpu.h        |  2 --
> >>   target/riscv/cpu_bits.h   |  6 -----
> >>   target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 54 +++++++--------------------------------
> >>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> >> index 0a33d387ba..a30a64241a 100644
> >> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> >> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> >> @@ -337,8 +337,6 @@ bool riscv_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int 
> >> interrupt_request);
> >>   bool riscv_cpu_fp_enabled(CPURISCVState *env);
> >>   bool riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(CPURISCVState *env);
> >>   void riscv_cpu_set_virt_enabled(CPURISCVState *env, bool enable);
> >> -bool riscv_cpu_force_hs_excep_enabled(CPURISCVState *env);
> >> -void riscv_cpu_set_force_hs_excep(CPURISCVState *env, bool enable);
> >>   bool riscv_cpu_two_stage_lookup(int mmu_idx);
> >>   int riscv_cpu_mmu_index(CPURISCVState *env, bool ifetch);
> >>   hwaddr riscv_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(CPUState *cpu, vaddr addr);
> >> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> >> index caf4599207..7322f54157 100644
> >> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> >> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> >> @@ -462,12 +462,6 @@
> >>
> >>   /* Virtulisation Register Fields */
> >>   #define VIRT_ONOFF          1
> >> -/* This is used to save state for when we take an exception. If this is 
> >> set
> >> - * that means that we want to force a HS level exception (no matter what 
> >> the
> >> - * delegation is set to). This will occur for things such as a second 
> >> level
> >> - * page table fault.
> >> - */
> >> -#define FORCE_HS_EXCEP      2
> >>
> >>   /* RV32 satp CSR field masks */
> >>   #define SATP32_MODE         0x80000000
> >> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> >> index 21c54ef561..babe3d844b 100644
> >> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> >> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> >> @@ -38,36 +38,24 @@ int riscv_cpu_mmu_index(CPURISCVState *env, bool 
> >> ifetch)
> >>   #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> >>   static int riscv_cpu_local_irq_pending(CPURISCVState *env)
> >>   {
> >> -    target_ulong irqs;
> >> +    target_ulong virt_enabled = riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env);
> >>
> >>       target_ulong mstatus_mie = get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS_MIE);
> >>       target_ulong mstatus_sie = get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS_SIE);
> >> -    target_ulong hs_mstatus_sie = get_field(env->mstatus_hs, MSTATUS_SIE);
> >>
> >> -    target_ulong pending = env->mip & env->mie &
> >> -                               ~(MIP_VSSIP | MIP_VSTIP | MIP_VSEIP);
> >> -    target_ulong vspending = (env->mip & env->mie &
> >> -                              (MIP_VSSIP | MIP_VSTIP | MIP_VSEIP));
> >> +    target_ulong pending = env->mip & env->mie;
> >>
> >>       target_ulong mie    = env->priv < PRV_M ||
> >>                             (env->priv == PRV_M && mstatus_mie);
> >>       target_ulong sie    = env->priv < PRV_S ||
> >>                             (env->priv == PRV_S && mstatus_sie);
> >> -    target_ulong hs_sie = env->priv < PRV_S ||
> >> -                          (env->priv == PRV_S && hs_mstatus_sie);
> >> +    target_ulong hsie   = virt_enabled || sie;
> >> +    target_ulong vsie   = virt_enabled && sie;
> >>
> >> -    if (riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env)) {
> >> -        target_ulong pending_hs_irq = pending & -hs_sie;
> >> -
> >> -        if (pending_hs_irq) {
> >> -            riscv_cpu_set_force_hs_excep(env, FORCE_HS_EXCEP);
> >> -            return ctz64(pending_hs_irq);
> >> -        }
> >> -
> >> -        pending = vspending;
> >> -    }
> >> -
> >> -    irqs = (pending & ~env->mideleg & -mie) | (pending &  env->mideleg & 
> >> -sie);
> >> +    target_ulong irqs =
> >> +            (pending & ~env->mideleg & -mie) |
> >> +            (pending &  env->mideleg & ~env->hideleg & -hsie) |
> >> +            (pending &  env->mideleg &  env->hideleg & -vsie);
> >>
> >>       if (irqs) {
> >>           return ctz64(irqs); /* since non-zero */
> >> @@ -190,24 +178,6 @@ void riscv_cpu_set_virt_enabled(CPURISCVState *env, 
> >> bool enable)
> >>       env->virt = set_field(env->virt, VIRT_ONOFF, enable);
> >>   }
> >>
> >> -bool riscv_cpu_force_hs_excep_enabled(CPURISCVState *env)
> >> -{
> >> -    if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVH)) {
> >> -        return false;
> >> -    }
> >> -
> >> -    return get_field(env->virt, FORCE_HS_EXCEP);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -void riscv_cpu_set_force_hs_excep(CPURISCVState *env, bool enable)
> >> -{
> >> -    if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVH)) {
> >> -        return;
> >> -    }
> >> -
> >> -    env->virt = set_field(env->virt, FORCE_HS_EXCEP, enable);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >>   bool riscv_cpu_two_stage_lookup(int mmu_idx)
> >>   {
> >>       return mmu_idx & TB_FLAGS_PRIV_HYP_ACCESS_MASK;
> >> @@ -896,7 +866,6 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >>
> >>       RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cs);
> >>       CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> >> -    bool force_hs_execp = riscv_cpu_force_hs_excep_enabled(env);
> >>       uint64_t s;
> >>
> >>       /* cs->exception is 32-bits wide unlike mcause which is XLEN-bits 
> >> wide
> >> @@ -925,8 +894,6 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >>           case RISCV_EXCP_INST_GUEST_PAGE_FAULT:
> >>           case RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_GUEST_ACCESS_FAULT:
> >>           case RISCV_EXCP_STORE_GUEST_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT:
> >> -            force_hs_execp = true;
> >> -            /* fallthrough */
> >>           case RISCV_EXCP_INST_ADDR_MIS:
> >>           case RISCV_EXCP_INST_ACCESS_FAULT:
> >>           case RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_ADDR_MIS:
> >> @@ -985,8 +952,7 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >>                   env->hstatus = set_field(env->hstatus, HSTATUS_GVA, 0);
> >>               }
> >>
> >> -            if (riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env) && ((hdeleg >> cause) & 1) &&
> >> -                !force_hs_execp) {
> >> +            if (riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env) && ((hdeleg >> cause) & 1)) {
> >>                   /* Trap to VS mode */
> >>                   /*
> >>                    * See if we need to adjust cause. Yes if its VS mode 
> >> interrupt
> >> @@ -1008,7 +974,6 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >>                   htval = env->guest_phys_fault_addr;
> >>
> >>                   riscv_cpu_set_virt_enabled(env, 0);
> >> -                riscv_cpu_set_force_hs_excep(env, 0);
> >>               } else {
> >>                   /* Trap into HS mode */
> >>                   env->hstatus = set_field(env->hstatus, HSTATUS_SPV, 
> >> false);
> >> @@ -1044,7 +1009,6 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >>
> >>               /* Trapping to M mode, virt is disabled */
> >>               riscv_cpu_set_virt_enabled(env, 0);
> >> -            riscv_cpu_set_force_hs_excep(env, 0);
> >>           }
> >>
> >>           s = env->mstatus;
> >> --
> >> 2.30.2
> >>
> >>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]