qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: e6500 stvx instruction


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: e6500 stvx instruction
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:51:12 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0

On 16/06/2021 10:57, BALATON Zoltan wrote:

Ah. thanks. I've missed that as I've only looked in .c files and it's in .c.inc. If I get this macro correctly it pastes name to gen_st so I expect to see a GEN_VR_STX(vx,...) somewhere for stvx but I can only find:

GEN_VR_STX(svx, 0x07, 0x07);
/* As we don't emulate the cache, stvxl is stricly equivalent to stvx */
GEN_VR_STX(svxl, 0x07, 0x0F);

so where is stvx defined at the end or how does this work?

Then I've checked the opcode above: 0x7e8029ce which seems to be 1f-07-07-00 so the GEN_VR_STX(svx, 0x07, 0x07) seems to match that.

From this you can see the exception is thrown if ctx->altivec_enabled isn't true, where ctx->altivec_enabled is set in ppc_tr_init_disas_context() to:

   ctx->altivec_enabled = (hflags >> HFLAGS_VR) & 1;

It seems the issue is that somehow HFLAGS_VR isn't being set from the CPUPPCState env->flags in hreg_compute_hflags_value(). There was a recent patchset from Richard that tidied up the hflags (see https://patchew.org/QEMU/20210323184340.619757-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org/) so it could be the issue was accidentally introduced there.

As far as I could trace this back MSR_VR that should correspond to HFLAGS_VR is turned on by POWERPC_FLAG_VRE which is set in PowerPCCPUClass::flags in POWERPC_FAMILY(e6500) in cpu_init.c (the last thing in that function). This is done in hreg_compute_hflags_value(). Other than that HFLAGS_VR only appears in ppc_tr_init_disas_context() so probably this should correspond to MSR_VR which the e6500 manual calls MSR[SPV] and seems to be off in the register dump above. So maybe it's a guest bug trying to execute Altivec instruction without enabling the vector unit?

I guess it could be either the guest is trying to execute Altivec instructions without configuring the MSR correctly, or perhaps that the default value of the MSR is incorrect and should have the SPV bit set for that particular CPU?


ATB,

Mark.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]