[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH qemu] ppc/spapr: Receive and store device tree blo
From: |
Alexey Kardashevskiy |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH qemu] ppc/spapr: Receive and store device tree blob from SLOF |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:36:09 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 |
On 10/12/2018 17:20, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 03:12:26PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/11/2018 05:10, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>> Hi Alexey,
>>>
>>> Just a few remarks. See below.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 12:44:06 +1100
>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> SLOF receives a device tree and updates it with various properties
>>>> before switching to the guest kernel and QEMU is not aware of any changes
>>>> made by SLOF. Since there is no real RTAS (QEMU implements it), it makes
>>>> sense to pass the SLOF final device tree to QEMU to let it implement
>>>> RTAS related tasks better, such as PCI host bus adapter hotplug.
>>>>
>>>> Specifially, now QEMU can find out the actual XICS phandle (for PHB
>>>> hotplug) and the RTAS linux,rtas-entry/base properties (for firmware
>>>> assisted NMI - FWNMI).
>>>>
>>>> This stores the initial DT blob in the sPAPR machine and replaces it
>>>> in the KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT (new private hypercall) handler.
>>>>
>>>> This adds an @update_dt_enabled machine property to allow backward
>>>> migration.
>>>>
>>>> SLOF already has a hypercall since
>>>> https://github.com/aik/SLOF/commit/e6fc84652c9c0073f9183
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 7 ++++++-
>>>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> hw/ppc/trace-events | 2 ++
>>>> 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>>>> index ad4d7cfd97..f5dcaf44cb 100644
>>>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>>>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>>>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct sPAPRMachineClass {
>>>>
>>>> /*< public >*/
>>>> bool dr_lmb_enabled; /* enable dynamic-reconfig/hotplug of LMBs
>>>> */
>>>> + bool update_dt_enabled; /* enable KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT */
>>>> bool use_ohci_by_default; /* use USB-OHCI instead of XHCI */
>>>> bool pre_2_10_has_unused_icps;
>>>> bool legacy_irq_allocation;
>>>> @@ -136,6 +137,9 @@ struct sPAPRMachineState {
>>>> int vrma_adjust;
>>>> ssize_t rtas_size;
>>>> void *rtas_blob;
>>>> + uint32_t fdt_size;
>>>> + uint32_t fdt_initial_size;
>>>
>>> I don't quite see the purpose of fdt_initial_size... it seems to be only
>>> used to print a trace.
>>
>>
>> Ah, lost in rebase. The purpose was to test if the new device tree has
>> not grown too much.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> + void *fdt_blob;
>>>> long kernel_size;
>>>> bool kernel_le;
>>>> uint32_t initrd_base;
>>>> @@ -462,7 +466,8 @@ struct sPAPRMachineState {
>>>> #define KVMPPC_H_LOGICAL_MEMOP (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x1)
>>>> /* Client Architecture support */
>>>> #define KVMPPC_H_CAS (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x2)
>>>> -#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX KVMPPC_H_CAS
>>>> +#define KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x3)
>>>> +#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT
>>>>
>>>> typedef struct sPAPRDeviceTreeUpdateHeader {
>>>> uint32_t version_id;
>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>>> index c08130facb..5e2d4d211c 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>>> @@ -1633,7 +1633,10 @@ static void spapr_machine_reset(void)
>>>> /* Load the fdt */
>>>> qemu_fdt_dumpdtb(fdt, fdt_totalsize(fdt));
>>>> cpu_physical_memory_write(fdt_addr, fdt, fdt_totalsize(fdt));
>>>> - g_free(fdt);
>>>> + g_free(spapr->fdt_blob);
>>>> + spapr->fdt_size = fdt_totalsize(fdt);
>>>> + spapr->fdt_initial_size = spapr->fdt_size;
>>>> + spapr->fdt_blob = fdt;
>>>
>>> Hmm... It looks weird to store state in a reset handler. I'd rather zeroe
>>> both fdt_blob and fdt_size here.
>>
>> The device tree is built from the reset handler and the idea is that we
>> want to always have some tree in the machine.
>
> Yes, I think the approach here is fine. Otherwise when we want to
> look up the current fdt state in RTAS calls or whatever we'd always
> have to do
> if (fdt_blob)
> look up that
> else
> look up qemu created fdt.
>
> Incidentally 'fdt' and 'fdt_blob' names do a terrible job of
> distinguishing what the difference is. Renaming fdt to fdt_initial
> (to match fdt_initial_size) and fdt_blob to fdt should make that
> clearer.
There is just one fdt in sPAPRMachineState - it is fdt_blob as it is
flattened. The "fdt" symbol above is local to spapr_machine_reset() and
when the tree is built - it is stored in fdt_blob.
--
Alexey
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH qemu] ppc/spapr: Receive and store device tree blob from SLOF,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <=