[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH qemu] ppc/spapr: Receive and store device tree blo
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH qemu] ppc/spapr: Receive and store device tree blob from SLOF |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:20:43 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 03:12:26PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/2018 05:10, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Hi Alexey,
> >
> > Just a few remarks. See below.
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 12:44:06 +1100
> > Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> SLOF receives a device tree and updates it with various properties
> >> before switching to the guest kernel and QEMU is not aware of any changes
> >> made by SLOF. Since there is no real RTAS (QEMU implements it), it makes
> >> sense to pass the SLOF final device tree to QEMU to let it implement
> >> RTAS related tasks better, such as PCI host bus adapter hotplug.
> >>
> >> Specifially, now QEMU can find out the actual XICS phandle (for PHB
> >> hotplug) and the RTAS linux,rtas-entry/base properties (for firmware
> >> assisted NMI - FWNMI).
> >>
> >> This stores the initial DT blob in the sPAPR machine and replaces it
> >> in the KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT (new private hypercall) handler.
> >>
> >> This adds an @update_dt_enabled machine property to allow backward
> >> migration.
> >>
> >> SLOF already has a hypercall since
> >> https://github.com/aik/SLOF/commit/e6fc84652c9c0073f9183
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 7 ++++++-
> >> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> hw/ppc/trace-events | 2 ++
> >> 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >> index ad4d7cfd97..f5dcaf44cb 100644
> >> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct sPAPRMachineClass {
> >>
> >> /*< public >*/
> >> bool dr_lmb_enabled; /* enable dynamic-reconfig/hotplug of LMBs
> >> */
> >> + bool update_dt_enabled; /* enable KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT */
> >> bool use_ohci_by_default; /* use USB-OHCI instead of XHCI */
> >> bool pre_2_10_has_unused_icps;
> >> bool legacy_irq_allocation;
> >> @@ -136,6 +137,9 @@ struct sPAPRMachineState {
> >> int vrma_adjust;
> >> ssize_t rtas_size;
> >> void *rtas_blob;
> >> + uint32_t fdt_size;
> >> + uint32_t fdt_initial_size;
> >
> > I don't quite see the purpose of fdt_initial_size... it seems to be only
> > used to print a trace.
>
>
> Ah, lost in rebase. The purpose was to test if the new device tree has
> not grown too much.
>
>
>
> >
> >> + void *fdt_blob;
> >> long kernel_size;
> >> bool kernel_le;
> >> uint32_t initrd_base;
> >> @@ -462,7 +466,8 @@ struct sPAPRMachineState {
> >> #define KVMPPC_H_LOGICAL_MEMOP (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x1)
> >> /* Client Architecture support */
> >> #define KVMPPC_H_CAS (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x2)
> >> -#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX KVMPPC_H_CAS
> >> +#define KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x3)
> >> +#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT
> >>
> >> typedef struct sPAPRDeviceTreeUpdateHeader {
> >> uint32_t version_id;
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >> index c08130facb..5e2d4d211c 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >> @@ -1633,7 +1633,10 @@ static void spapr_machine_reset(void)
> >> /* Load the fdt */
> >> qemu_fdt_dumpdtb(fdt, fdt_totalsize(fdt));
> >> cpu_physical_memory_write(fdt_addr, fdt, fdt_totalsize(fdt));
> >> - g_free(fdt);
> >> + g_free(spapr->fdt_blob);
> >> + spapr->fdt_size = fdt_totalsize(fdt);
> >> + spapr->fdt_initial_size = spapr->fdt_size;
> >> + spapr->fdt_blob = fdt;
> >
> > Hmm... It looks weird to store state in a reset handler. I'd rather zeroe
> > both fdt_blob and fdt_size here.
>
> The device tree is built from the reset handler and the idea is that we
> want to always have some tree in the machine.
Yes, I think the approach here is fine. Otherwise when we want to
look up the current fdt state in RTAS calls or whatever we'd always
have to do
if (fdt_blob)
look up that
else
look up qemu created fdt.
Incidentally 'fdt' and 'fdt_blob' names do a terrible job of
distinguishing what the difference is. Renaming fdt to fdt_initial
(to match fdt_initial_size) and fdt_blob to fdt should make that
clearer.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH qemu] ppc/spapr: Receive and store device tree blob from SLOF,
David Gibson <=
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH qemu] ppc/spapr: Receive and store device tree blob from SLOF, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2018/12/10