[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 06/37] ppc/xive: add support for the END Event
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 06/37] ppc/xive: add support for the END Event State buffers |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:09:14 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:22:20AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> The Event Notification Descriptor (END) XIVE structure also contains
> two Event State Buffers providing further coalescing of interrupts,
> one for the notification event (ESn) and one for the escalation events
> (ESe). A MMIO page is assigned for each to control the EOI through
> loads only. Stores are not allowed.
>
> The END ESBs are modeled through an object resembling the 'XiveSource'
> It is stateless as the END state bits are backed into the XiveEND
> structure under the XiveRouter and the MMIO accesses follow the same
> rules as for the standard source ESBs.
>
> END ESBs are not supported by the Linux drivers neither on OPAL nor on
> sPAPR. Nevetherless, it provides a mean to study the question in the
> future and validates a bit more the XIVE model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/hw/ppc/xive.h | 22 ++++++
> hw/intc/xive.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> index d1b4c6c78ec5..d67b0785df7c 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> @@ -305,6 +305,8 @@ static inline void xive_source_irq_set(XiveSource *xsrc,
> uint32_t srcno,
>
> typedef struct XiveRouter {
> SysBusDevice parent;
> +
> + uint32_t chip_id;
I still don't think you need this..
> } XiveRouter;
>
> #define TYPE_XIVE_ROUTER "xive-router"
> @@ -336,6 +338,26 @@ int xive_router_get_end(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t
> end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
> int xive_router_write_end(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t
> end_idx,
> XiveEND *end, uint8_t word_number);
>
> +/*
> + * XIVE END ESBs
> + */
> +
> +#define TYPE_XIVE_END_SOURCE "xive-end-source"
> +#define XIVE_END_SOURCE(obj) \
> + OBJECT_CHECK(XiveENDSource, (obj), TYPE_XIVE_END_SOURCE)
> +
> +typedef struct XiveENDSource {
> + DeviceState parent;
> +
> + uint32_t nr_ends;
> +
> + /* ESB memory region */
> + uint32_t esb_shift;
> + MemoryRegion esb_mmio;
> +
> + XiveRouter *xrtr;
..or this..
> +} XiveENDSource;
> +
> /*
> * For legacy compatibility, the exceptions define up to 256 different
> * priorities. P9 implements only 9 levels : 8 active levels [0 - 7]
> diff --git a/hw/intc/xive.c b/hw/intc/xive.c
> index 41d8ba1540d0..83686e260df5 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/xive.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/xive.c
> @@ -612,8 +612,18 @@ static void xive_router_end_notify(XiveRouter *xrtr,
> uint8_t end_blk,
> * even futher coalescing in the Router
> */
> if (!xive_end_is_notify(&end)) {
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "XIVE: !UCOND_NOTIFY not implemented\n");
> - return;
> + uint8_t pq = GETFIELD_BE32(END_W1_ESn, end.w1);
> + bool notify = xive_esb_trigger(&pq);
> +
> + if (pq != GETFIELD_BE32(END_W1_ESn, end.w1)) {
> + end.w1 = SETFIELD_BE32(END_W1_ESn, end.w1, pq);
> + xive_router_write_end(xrtr, end_blk, end_idx, &end, 1);
> + }
> +
> + /* ESn[Q]=1 : end of notification */
> + if (!notify) {
> + return;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -658,12 +668,18 @@ static void xive_router_notify(XiveNotifier *xn,
> uint32_t lisn)
> GETFIELD_BE64(EAS_END_DATA, eas.w));
> }
>
> +static Property xive_router_properties[] = {
> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("chip-id", XiveRouter, chip_id, 0),
> + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> +};
> +
> static void xive_router_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> XiveNotifierClass *xnc = XIVE_NOTIFIER_CLASS(klass);
>
> dc->desc = "XIVE Router Engine";
> + dc->props = xive_router_properties;
> xnc->notify = xive_router_notify;
> }
>
> @@ -692,6 +708,158 @@ void xive_eas_pic_print_info(XiveEAS *eas, uint32_t
> lisn, Monitor *mon)
> (uint32_t) GETFIELD_BE64(EAS_END_DATA, eas->w));
> }
>
> +/*
> + * END ESB MMIO loads
> + */
> +static uint64_t xive_end_source_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned
> size)
> +{
> + XiveENDSource *xsrc = XIVE_END_SOURCE(opaque);
> + XiveRouter *xrtr = xsrc->xrtr;
> + uint32_t offset = addr & 0xFFF;
> + uint8_t end_blk;
> + uint32_t end_idx;
> + XiveEND end;
> + uint32_t end_esmask;
> + uint8_t pq;
> + uint64_t ret = -1;
> +
> + end_blk = xrtr->chip_id;
.. instead I think it makes more sense to just configure the end_blk
directly on the end_source, rather than reaching into another object
to
> + end_idx = addr >> (xsrc->esb_shift + 1);
> +
> + if (xive_router_get_end(xrtr, end_blk, end_idx, &end)) {
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "XIVE: No END %x/%x\n", end_blk,
> + end_idx);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (!xive_end_is_valid(&end)) {
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "XIVE: END %x/%x is invalid\n",
> + end_blk, end_idx);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + end_esmask = addr_is_even(addr, xsrc->esb_shift) ? END_W1_ESn :
> END_W1_ESe;
> + pq = GETFIELD_BE32(end_esmask, end.w1);
> +
> + switch (offset) {
> + case XIVE_ESB_LOAD_EOI ... XIVE_ESB_LOAD_EOI + 0x7FF:
> + ret = xive_esb_eoi(&pq);
> +
> + /* Forward the source event notification for routing ?? */
> + break;
> +
> + case XIVE_ESB_GET ... XIVE_ESB_GET + 0x3FF:
> + ret = pq;
> + break;
> +
> + case XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_00 ... XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_00 + 0x0FF:
> + case XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_01 ... XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_01 + 0x0FF:
> + case XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_10 ... XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_10 + 0x0FF:
> + case XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_11 ... XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_11 + 0x0FF:
> + ret = xive_esb_set(&pq, (offset >> 8) & 0x3);
> + break;
> + default:
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "XIVE: invalid END ESB load addr
> %d\n",
> + offset);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (pq != GETFIELD_BE32(end_esmask, end.w1)) {
> + end.w1 = SETFIELD_BE32(end_esmask, end.w1, pq);
> + xive_router_write_end(xrtr, end_blk, end_idx, &end, 1);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * END ESB MMIO stores are invalid
> + */
> +static void xive_end_source_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> + uint64_t value, unsigned size)
> +{
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "XIVE: invalid ESB write addr 0x%"
> + HWADDR_PRIx"\n", addr);
> +}
> +
> +static const MemoryRegionOps xive_end_source_ops = {
> + .read = xive_end_source_read,
> + .write = xive_end_source_write,
> + .endianness = DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN,
> + .valid = {
> + .min_access_size = 8,
> + .max_access_size = 8,
> + },
> + .impl = {
> + .min_access_size = 8,
> + .max_access_size = 8,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static void xive_source_end_reset(void *dev)
> +{
> + /* TODO: Loop on all ENDs and mask off the ESn and ESe */
IIUC you're talking about actually writing the (potentially in memory)
END structures. I don't think that makes sense for the END source
hardware model. I'm guessing you want this for PAPR, where the ENDs
are in virtual hardware rather than guest memory, but in that case I
think the reset handling should be in the PAPR specific Xive object,
not the end_source itself.
> +}
> +
> +static void xive_end_source_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + XiveENDSource *xsrc = XIVE_END_SOURCE(dev);
> + Object *obj;
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
> +
> + obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "xive", &local_err);
> + if (!obj) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> + error_prepend(errp, "required link 'xive' not found: ");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + xsrc->xrtr = XIVE_ROUTER(obj);
> +
> + if (!xsrc->nr_ends) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Number of interrupt needs to be greater than 0");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (xsrc->esb_shift != XIVE_ESB_4K &&
> + xsrc->esb_shift != XIVE_ESB_64K) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Invalid ESB shift setting");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Each END is assigned an even/odd pair of MMIO pages, the even page
> + * manages the ESn field while the odd page manages the ESe field.
> + */
> + memory_region_init_io(&xsrc->esb_mmio, OBJECT(xsrc),
> + &xive_end_source_ops, xsrc, "xive.end",
> + (1ull << (xsrc->esb_shift + 1)) * xsrc->nr_ends);
> +
> + qemu_register_reset(xive_source_end_reset, dev);
> +}
> +
> +static Property xive_end_source_properties[] = {
> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("nr-ends", XiveENDSource, nr_ends, 0),
> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("shift", XiveENDSource, esb_shift, XIVE_ESB_64K),
> + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> +};
> +
> +static void xive_end_source_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> +{
> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> +
> + dc->desc = "XIVE END Source";
> + dc->props = xive_end_source_properties;
> + dc->realize = xive_end_source_realize;
> +}
> +
> +static const TypeInfo xive_end_source_info = {
> + .name = TYPE_XIVE_END_SOURCE,
> + .parent = TYPE_DEVICE,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(XiveENDSource),
> + .class_init = xive_end_source_class_init,
> +};
> +
> /*
> * XIVE Fabric
> */
> @@ -706,6 +874,7 @@ static void xive_register_types(void)
> type_register_static(&xive_source_info);
> type_register_static(&xive_fabric_info);
> type_register_static(&xive_router_info);
> + type_register_static(&xive_end_source_info);
> }
>
> type_init(xive_register_types)
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 03/37] ppc/xive: introduce the XiveNotifier interface, (continued)
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 04/37] ppc/xive: introduce the XiveRouter model, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/12/05
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 05/37] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE Event Notification Descriptors, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/12/05
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 06/37] ppc/xive: add support for the END Event State buffers, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/12/05
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 06/37] ppc/xive: add support for the END Event State buffers,
David Gibson <=
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 07/37] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE interrupt thread context, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/12/05
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 08/37] ppc/xive: introduce a simplified XIVE presenter, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/12/05
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v6 09/37] ppc/xive: notify the CPU when the interrupt priority is more privileged, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/12/05