Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] POWER9 TCG enablements - part 13

[David Gibson]

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:29:37PM -0200, address@hidden wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:11:31PM -0800, address@hidden wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> > more information:
> > 
> > Type: series
> > Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] POWER9 TCG enablements - part 13
> > Message-id: address@hidden
> > 
> > === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
> > #!/bin/bash
> > 
> > BASE=base
> > n=1
> > total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
> > failed=0
> > 
> > # Useful git options
> > git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
> > git config --local diff.renames True
> > 
> > commits="$(git log --format=%H --reverse $BASE..)"
> > for c in $commits; do
> >     echo "Checking PATCH $n/$total: $(git log -n 1 --format=%s $c)..."
> >     if ! git show $c --format=email | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback -; 
> > then
> >         failed=1
> >         echo
> >     fi
> >     n=$((n+1))
> > done
> > 
> > exit $failed
> > === TEST SCRIPT END ===
> > 
> > Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
> > From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
> >  * [new tag]         patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
> >  - [tag update]      patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
> > Switched to a new branch 'test'
> > 52f618a ppc: implement xssubqp instruction
> > f7dfdbf ppc: implement xssqrtqp instruction
> > 4d895a4 ppc: implement xsrqpxp instruction
> > 5d49c07 ppc: implement xsrqpi[x] instruction
> > 
> > === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
> > Checking PATCH 1/4: ppc: implement xsrqpi[x] instruction...
> > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
> > #125: FILE: target/ppc/translate/vsx-ops.inc.c:106:
> > +#define GEN_VSX_Z23FORM_300(name, opc2, opc3, opc4, inval) \
> > +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x00, opc4 | 0x0, inval), \
> > +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x08, opc4 | 0x0, inval), \
> > +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x10, opc4 | 0x0, inval), \
> > +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x18, opc4 | 0x0, inval), \
> > +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x00, opc4 | 0x1, inval), \
> > +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x08, opc4 | 0x1, inval), \
> > +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x10, opc4 | 0x1, inval), \
> > +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x18, opc4 | 0x1, inval)
> > 
> 
> I tried to improve it but this style is used everywhere

Yeah, that's ok.  These instruction generation macros trigger known
false positives in checkpatch.  I think it thinks these are macro
definitions, rather than macro invocations.

> 
> > total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 103 lines checked
> > 
> > Your patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
> > are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> > CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> > 
> > Checking PATCH 2/4: ppc: implement xsrqpxp instruction...
> > Checking PATCH 3/4: ppc: implement xssqrtqp instruction...
> > Checking PATCH 4/4: ppc: implement xssubqp instruction...
> > === OUTPUT END ===
> > 
> > Test command exited with code: 1
> > 
> > 
> > ---
> > Email generated automatically by Patchew [http://patchew.org/].
> > Please send your feedback to address@hidden
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature