[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 3/6] pseries: Implement HPT resizing
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 3/6] pseries: Implement HPT resizing |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:34:42 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) |
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:28:36AM +1100, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 17:48 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 03:06:12PM +1100, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 17:11 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patch implements hypercalls allowing a PAPR guest to resize
> > > > its
> > > > own
> > > > hash page table. This will eventually allow for more flexible
> > > > memory
> > > > hotplug.
> > > >
> > > > The implementation is partially asynchronous, handled in a
> > > > special
> > > > thread
> > > > running the hpt_prepare_thread() function. The state of a
> > > > pending
> > > > resize
> > > > is stored in SPAPR_MACHINE->pending_hpt.
> > > >
> > > > The H_RESIZE_HPT_PREPARE hypercall will kick off creation of a
> > > > new
> > > > HPT, or,
> > > > if one is already in progress, monitor it for completion. If
> > > > there
> > > > is an
> > > > existing HPT resize in progress that doesn't match the size
> > > > specified
> > > > in
> > > > the call, it will cancel it, replacing it with a new one matching
> > > > the
> > > > given size.
> > > >
> > > > The H_RESIZE_HPT_COMMIT completes transition to a resized HPT,
> > > > and
> > > > can only
> > > > be called successfully once H_RESIZE_HPT_PREPARE has successfully
> > > > completed initialization of a new HPT. The guest must ensure
> > > > that
> > > > there
> > > > are no concurrent accesses to the existing HPT while this is
> > > > called
> > > > (this
> > > > effectively means stop_machine() for Linux guests).
> > > >
> > > > For now H_RESIZE_HPT_COMMIT goes through the whole old HPT,
> > > > rehashing
> > > > each
> > > > HPTE into the new HPT. This can have quite high latency, but it
> > > > seems to
> > > > be of the order of typical migration downtime latencies for HPTs
> > > > of
> > > > size
> > > > up to ~2GiB (which would be used in a 256GiB guest).
> > > >
> > > > In future we probably want to move more of the rehashing to the
> > > > "prepare"
> > > > phase, by having H_ENTER and other hcalls update both current and
> > > > pending HPTs. That's a project for another day, but should be
> > > > possible
> > > > without any changes to the guest interface.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> > > > ---
> > > > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 4 +-
> > > > hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 353
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 6 +
> > > > target-ppc/mmu-hash64.h | 4 +
> > > > 4 files changed, 361 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > > index 42277a6..129b7d2 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > > @@ -93,8 +93,6 @@
> > > >
> > > > #define PHANDLE_XICP 0x00001111
> > > >
> > > > -#define HTAB_SIZE(spapr) (1ULL << ((spapr)->htab_shift))
> > > > -
> > > > static XICSState *try_create_xics(const char *type, int
> > > > nr_servers,
> > > > int nr_irqs, Error **errp)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -1055,7 +1053,7 @@ static void close_htab_fd(sPAPRMachineState
> > > > *spapr)
> > > > spapr->htab_fd = -1;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static int spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(uint64_t ramsize)
> > > > +int spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(uint64_t ramsize)
> > > > {
> > > > int shift;
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> > > > index 72a9c4d..c0898a4 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> > > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > > > #include "qapi/error.h"
> > > > #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> > > > #include "qemu/log.h"
> > > > +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
> > > > #include "cpu.h"
> > > > #include "exec/exec-all.h"
> > > > #include "helper_regs.h"
> > > > @@ -355,20 +356,327 @@ static target_ulong h_read(PowerPCCPU
> > > > *cpu,
> > > > sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > > > return H_SUCCESS;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +struct sPAPRPendingHPT {
> > > > + /* These fields are read-only after initialization */
> > > > + int shift;
> > > > + QemuThread thread;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* These fields are protected by the BQL */
> > > > + bool complete;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* These fields are private to the preparation thread if
> > > > + * !complete, otherwise protected by the BQL */
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > + void *hpt;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static void free_pending_hpt(sPAPRPendingHPT *pending)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (pending->hpt) {
> > > > + qemu_vfree(pending->hpt);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + g_free(pending);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void *hpt_prepare_thread(void *opaque)
> > > > +{
> > > > + sPAPRPendingHPT *pending = opaque;
> > > > + size_t size = 1ULL << pending->shift;
> > > > +
> > > > + pending->hpt = qemu_memalign(size, size);
> > > > + if (pending->hpt) {
> > > > + memset(pending->hpt, 0, size);
> > > > + pending->ret = H_SUCCESS;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + pending->ret = H_NO_MEM;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> > > > +
> > > > + if (SPAPR_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine())->pending_hpt ==
> > > > pending) {
> > > > + /* Ready to go */
> > > > + pending->complete = true;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + /* We've been cancelled, clean ourselves up */
> > > > + free_pending_hpt(pending);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/* Must be called with BQL held */
> > > > +static void cancel_hpt_prepare(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
> > > > +{
> > > > + sPAPRPendingHPT *pending = spapr->pending_hpt;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Let the thread know it's cancelled */
> > > > + spapr->pending_hpt = NULL;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!pending) {
> > > > + /* Nothing to do */
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!pending->complete) {
> > > > + /* thread will clean itself up */
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + free_pending_hpt(pending);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int build_dimm_list(Object *obj, void *opaque)
> > > > +{
> > > > + GSList **list = opaque;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (object_dynamic_cast(obj, TYPE_PC_DIMM)) {
> > > > + DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
> > > > + if (dev->realized) { /* only realized DIMMs matter */
> > > > + *list = g_slist_prepend(*list, dev);
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + object_child_foreach(obj, build_dimm_list, opaque);
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static ram_addr_t get_current_ram_size(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + GSList *list = NULL, *item;
> > > > + ram_addr_t size = ram_size;
> > > > +
> > > > + build_dimm_list(qdev_get_machine(), &list);
> > > > + for (item = list; item; item = g_slist_next(item)) {
> > > > + Object *obj = OBJECT(item->data);
> > > > + if (!strcmp(object_get_typename(obj), TYPE_PC_DIMM)) {
> > > > + size += object_property_get_int(obj,
> > > > PC_DIMM_SIZE_PROP,
> > > > + &error_abort);
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > + g_slist_free(list);
> > > > +
> > > > + return size;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static target_ulong h_resize_hpt_prepare(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > > > sPAPRMachineState
> > > > *spapr,
> > > > target_ulong opcode,
> > > > target_ulong *args)
> > > > {
> > > > target_ulong flags = args[0];
> > > > - target_ulong shift = args[1];
> > > > + int shift = args[1];
> > > > + sPAPRPendingHPT *pending = spapr->pending_hpt;
> > > >
> > > > if (spapr->resize_hpt == SPAPR_RESIZE_HPT_DISABLED) {
> > > > return H_AUTHORITY;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > trace_spapr_h_resize_hpt_prepare(flags, shift);
> > > > - return H_HARDWARE;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (flags != 0) {
> > > > + return H_PARAMETER;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (shift && ((shift < 18) || (shift > 46))) {
> > > > + return H_PARAMETER;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* We only allow the guest to allocate an HPT one order
> > > > above
> > > > what
> > > > + * we'd normally give them (to stop a small guest claiming a
> > > > huge
> > > > + * chunk of resources in the HPT */
> > > > + if (shift >
> > > > (spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(get_current_ram_size())
> > > > + 1)) {
> > > > + assert(!pending || pending->shift != shift);
> > > Can you clarify for me the course of events which would cause this
> > > assert to fail?
> > This assert() would fail if somehow, despite the check here, we
> > already had a pending HPT which was too big for the current ramsize,
> > then we called prepare again with the same shift.
> Thanks, just checking because it seemed impossible given the code.
Well, of course - assert()s _should_ be impossible, they're to catch
cases where something you thought was impossible turns out not to be.
> >
> > Come to think of it.. maybe that could happen if we tried to reduce
> > the ramsize while an HPT resize was already in progress. I should
> > probably remove the assert.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > + return H_RESOURCE;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (pending) {
> > > > + /* something already in progress */
> > > > + if (pending->shift == shift) {
> > > > + /* and it's suitable */
> > > > + if (pending->complete) {
> > > > + return pending->ret;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + return H_LONG_BUSY_ORDER_100_MSEC;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* not suitable, cancel and replace */
> > > > + cancel_hpt_prepare(spapr);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!shift) {
> > > > + /* nothing to do */
> > > > + return H_SUCCESS;
> > > > + }
> > > For my benefit, does the ACR specify that calling prepare with a
> > > zero
> > > shift cancels any pending prepares?
> > Yes, it does.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > +
> > > > + /* start new prepare */
> > > > +
> > > > + pending = g_new0(sPAPRPendingHPT, 1);
> > > > + pending->shift = shift;
> > > > + pending->ret = H_HARDWARE;
> > > > +
> > > > + qemu_thread_create(&pending->thread, "sPAPR HPT prepare",
> > > > + hpt_prepare_thread, pending,
> > > > QEMU_THREAD_DETACHED);
> > > > +
> > > > + spapr->pending_hpt = pending;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* In theory we could estimate the time more accurately
> > > > based on
> > > > + * the new size, but there's not much point */
> > > > + return H_LONG_BUSY_ORDER_100_MSEC;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static uint64_t new_hpte_load0(void *htab, uint64_t pteg, int
> > > > slot)
> > > > +{
> > > > + uint8_t *addr = htab;
> > > > +
> > > > + addr += pteg * HASH_PTEG_SIZE_64;
> > > > + addr += slot * HASH_PTE_SIZE_64;
> > > > + return ldq_p(addr);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void new_hpte_store(void *htab, uint64_t pteg, int slot,
> > > > + uint64_t pte0, uint64_t pte1)
> > > > +{
> > > > + uint8_t *addr = htab;
> > > > +
> > > > + addr += pteg * HASH_PTEG_SIZE_64;
> > > > + addr += slot * HASH_PTE_SIZE_64;
> > > > +
> > > > + stq_p(addr, pte0);
> > > > + stq_p(addr + HASH_PTE_SIZE_64/2, pte1);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int rehash_hpte(PowerPCCPU *cpu, uint64_t token,
> > > > + void *old_hpt, uint64_t oldsize,
> > > > + void *new_hpt, uint64_t newsize,
> > > > + uint64_t pteg, int slot)
> > > > +{
> > > > + uint64_t old_hash_mask = (oldsize >> 7) - 1;
> > > > + uint64_t new_hash_mask = (newsize >> 7) - 1;
> > > > + target_ulong pte0 = ppc_hash64_load_hpte0(cpu, token, slot);
> > > > + target_ulong pte1;
> > > > + uint64_t avpn;
> > > > + unsigned base_pg_shift;
> > > > + uint64_t hash, new_pteg, replace_pte0;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!(pte0 & HPTE64_V_VALID) || !(pte0 & HPTE64_V_BOLTED)) {
> > > > + return H_SUCCESS;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + pte1 = ppc_hash64_load_hpte1(cpu, token, slot);
> > > > +
> > > > + base_pg_shift = ppc_hash64_hpte_page_shift_noslb(cpu, pte0,
> > > > pte1);
> > > > + assert(base_pg_shift); /* H_ENTER shouldn't allow a bad
> > > > encoding
> > > > */
> > > > + avpn = HPTE64_V_AVPN_VAL(pte0) & ~(((1ULL << base_pg_shift)
> > > > - 1)
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 23);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (pte0 & HPTE64_V_SECONDARY) {
> > > > + pteg = ~pteg;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if ((pte0 & HPTE64_V_SSIZE) == HPTE64_V_SSIZE_256M) {
> > > > + uint64_t offset, vsid;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* We only have 28 - 23 bits of offset in avpn */
> > > > + offset = (avpn & 0x1f) << 23;
> > > > + vsid = avpn >> 5;
> > > > + /* We can find more bits from the pteg value */
> > > > + if (base_pg_shift < 23) {
> > > > + offset |= ((vsid ^ pteg) & old_hash_mask) <<
> > > > base_pg_shift;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + hash = vsid ^ (offset >> base_pg_shift);
> > > > + } else if ((pte0 & HPTE64_V_SSIZE) == HPTE64_V_SSIZE_1T) {
> > > > + uint64_t offset, vsid;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* We only have 40 - 23 bits of seg_off in avpn */
> > > > + offset = (avpn & 0x1ffff) << 23;
> > > > + vsid = avpn >> 17;
> > > > + if (base_pg_shift < 23) {
> > > > + offset |= ((vsid ^ (vsid << 25) ^ pteg) &
> > > > old_hash_mask)
> > > > + << base_pg_shift;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + hash = vsid ^ (vsid << 25) ^ (offset >> base_pg_shift);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + error_report("rehash_pte: Bad segment size in HPTE");
> > > > + return H_HARDWARE;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + new_pteg = hash & new_hash_mask;
> > > > + if (pte0 & HPTE64_V_SECONDARY) {
> > > > + assert(~pteg == (hash & old_hash_mask));
> > > > + new_pteg = ~new_pteg;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + assert(pteg == (hash & old_hash_mask));
> > > > + }
> > > > + assert((oldsize != newsize) || (pteg == new_pteg));
> > > > + replace_pte0 = new_hpte_load0(new_hpt, new_pteg, slot);
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Strictly speaking, we don't need all these tests, since
> > > > we
> > > > only
> > > > + * ever rehash bolted HPTEs. We might in future handle non-
> > > > bolted
> > > > + * HPTEs, though so make the logic correct for those cases
> > > > as
> > > > + * well.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (replace_pte0 & HPTE64_V_VALID) {
> > > > + assert(newsize < oldsize);
> > > > + if (replace_pte0 & HPTE64_V_BOLTED) {
> > > > + if (pte0 & HPTE64_V_BOLTED) {
> > > > + /* Bolted collision, nothing we can do */
> > > > + return H_PTEG_FULL;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + /* Discard this hpte */
> > > > + return H_SUCCESS;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + new_hpte_store(new_hpt, new_pteg, slot, pte0, pte1);
> > > > + return H_SUCCESS;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int rehash_hpt(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > > > + void *old_hpt, uint64_t oldsize,
> > > > + void *new_hpt, uint64_t newsize)
> > > > +{
> > > > + CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> > > > + uint64_t n_ptegs = oldsize >> 7;
> > > > + uint64_t pteg;
> > > > + int slot;
> > > > + int rc;
> > > > +
> > > > + assert(env->external_htab == old_hpt);
> > > > +
> > > > + for (pteg = 0; pteg < n_ptegs; pteg++) {
> > > > + uint64_t token = ppc_hash64_start_access(cpu, pteg *
> > > > HPTES_PER_GROUP);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!token) {
> > > > + return H_HARDWARE;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + for (slot = 0; slot < HPTES_PER_GROUP; slot++) {
> > > > + rc = rehash_hpte(cpu, token, old_hpt, oldsize,
> > > > new_hpt,
> > > > newsize,
> > > > + pteg, slot);
> > > > + if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
> > > > + ppc_hash64_stop_access(cpu, token);
> > > > + return rc;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > + ppc_hash64_stop_access(cpu, token);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return H_SUCCESS;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void pivot_hpt(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data arg)
> > > > +{
> > > > + sPAPRMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(arg.host_ptr);
> > > > + PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> > > > +
> > > > + cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
> > > > + ppc_hash64_set_external_hpt(cpu, spapr->htab, spapr-
> > > > >htab_shift,
> > > > + &error_fatal);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static target_ulong h_resize_hpt_commit(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > > > @@ -378,13 +686,52 @@ static target_ulong
> > > > h_resize_hpt_commit(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > > > {
> > > > target_ulong flags = args[0];
> > > > target_ulong shift = args[1];
> > > > + sPAPRPendingHPT *pending = spapr->pending_hpt;
> > > > + int rc;
> > > > + size_t newsize;
> > > >
> > > > if (spapr->resize_hpt == SPAPR_RESIZE_HPT_DISABLED) {
> > > > return H_AUTHORITY;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > trace_spapr_h_resize_hpt_commit(flags, shift);
> > > > - return H_HARDWARE;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (flags != 0) {
> > > > + return H_PARAMETER;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!pending || (pending->shift != shift)) {
> > > > + /* no matching prepare */
> > > > + return H_CLOSED;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!pending->complete) {
> > > > + /* prepare has not completed */
> > > > + return H_BUSY;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + newsize = 1ULL << pending->shift;
> > > > + rc = rehash_hpt(cpu, spapr->htab, HTAB_SIZE(spapr),
> > > > + pending->hpt, newsize);
> > > > + if (rc == H_SUCCESS) {
> > > > + CPUState *cs;
> > > > +
> > > > + qemu_vfree(spapr->htab);
> > > > + spapr->htab = pending->hpt;
> > > > + spapr->htab_shift = pending->shift;
> > > > +
> > > > + CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
> > > > + run_on_cpu(cs, pivot_hpt,
> > > > RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(spapr));
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + pending->hpt = NULL; /* so it's not free()d */
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Clean up */
> > > > + spapr->pending_hpt = NULL;
> > > > + free_pending_hpt(pending);
> > > > +
> > > > + return rc;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static target_ulong h_set_sprg0(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > > > sPAPRMachineState
> > > > *spapr,
> > > > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > > > index d2c758b..954bada 100644
> > > > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > > > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct sPAPRNVRAM;
> > > > typedef struct sPAPRConfigureConnectorState
> > > > sPAPRConfigureConnectorState;
> > > > typedef struct sPAPREventLogEntry sPAPREventLogEntry;
> > > > typedef struct sPAPREventSource sPAPREventSource;
> > > > +typedef struct sPAPRPendingHPT sPAPRPendingHPT;
> > > >
> > > > #define HPTE64_V_HPTE_DIRTY 0x0000000000000040ULL
> > > > #define SPAPR_ENTRY_POINT 0x100
> > > > @@ -72,6 +73,8 @@ struct sPAPRMachineState {
> > > > sPAPRResizeHPT resize_hpt;
> > > > void *htab;
> > > > uint32_t htab_shift;
> > > > + sPAPRPendingHPT *pending_hpt; /* in-progress resize */
> > > > +
> > > > hwaddr rma_size;
> > > > int vrma_adjust;
> > > > ssize_t rtas_size;
> > > > @@ -627,6 +630,7 @@ void
> > > > spapr_hotplug_req_remove_by_count_indexed(sPAPRDRConnectorType
> > > > drc_type,
> > > > uint32_t count,
> > > > uint32_t index);
> > > > void *spapr_populate_hotplug_cpu_dt(CPUState *cs, int
> > > > *fdt_offset,
> > > > sPAPRMachineState *spapr);
> > > > +int spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(uint64_t ramsize);
> > > >
> > > > /* rtas-configure-connector state */
> > > > struct sPAPRConfigureConnectorState {
> > > > @@ -674,4 +678,6 @@ int spapr_rng_populate_dt(void *fdt);
> > > >
> > > > void spapr_do_system_reset_on_cpu(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data
> > > > arg);
> > > >
> > > > +#define HTAB_SIZE(spapr) (1ULL << ((spapr)->htab_shift))
> > > > +
> > > > #endif /* HW_SPAPR_H */
> > > > diff --git a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.h b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.h
> > > > index ab5d347..4a1b781 100644
> > > > --- a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.h
> > > > +++ b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.h
> > > > @@ -60,11 +60,15 @@ void ppc_hash64_update_rmls(CPUPPCState
> > > > *env);
> > > > #define HASH_PTE_SIZE_64 16
> > > > #define HASH_PTEG_SIZE_64 (HASH_PTE_SIZE_64 *
> > > > HPTES_PER_GROUP)
> > > >
> > > > +#define HPTE64_V_SSIZE SLB_VSID_B
> > > > +#define HPTE64_V_SSIZE_256M SLB_VSID_B_256M
> > > > +#define HPTE64_V_SSIZE_1T SLB_VSID_B_1T
> > > > #define HPTE64_V_SSIZE_SHIFT 62
> > > > #define HPTE64_V_AVPN_SHIFT 7
> > > > #define HPTE64_V_AVPN 0x3fffffffffffff80ULL
> > > > #define HPTE64_V_AVPN_VAL(x) (((x) & HPTE64_V_AVPN) >>
> > > > HPTE64_V_AVPN_SHIFT)
> > > > #define HPTE64_V_COMPARE(x, y) (!(((x) ^ (y)) &
> > > > 0xffffffffffffff83ULL))
> > > > +#define HPTE64_V_BOLTED 0x0000000000000010ULL
> > > > #define HPTE64_V_LARGE 0x0000000000000004ULL
> > > > #define HPTE64_V_SECONDARY 0x0000000000000002ULL
> > > > #define HPTE64_V_VALID 0x0000000000000001ULL
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 1/6] pseries: Add pseries-2.9 machine type, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 0/6] HPT resizing for pseries guests (qemu part), Andrea Bolognani, 2016/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 0/6] HPT resizing for pseries guests (qemu part), David Gibson, 2016/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 0/6] HPT resizing for pseries guests (qemu part), Andrea Bolognani, 2016/12/20
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 0/6] HPT resizing for pseries guests (qemu part), David Gibson, 2016/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 0/6] HPT resizing for pseries guests (qemu part), Andrea Bolognani, 2016/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 0/6] HPT resizing for pseries guests (qemu part), David Gibson, 2016/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 for-2.9 0/6] HPT resizing for pseries guests (qemu part), Andrea Bolognani, 2016/12/22