|
From: | Thomas Huth |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ui: Switch "-display sdl" to use the QAPI parser |
Date: | Mon, 23 May 2022 21:23:48 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 |
On 23/05/2022 15.45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:The "-display sdl" option still uses a hand-crafted parser for its parameters since we didn't want to drag an interface we considered somewhat flawed into the QAPI schema. Since the flaws are gone now, it's time to QAPIfy. This introduces the new "DisplaySDL" QAPI struct that is used to hold the parameters that are unique to the SDL display. The only specific parameter is currently "grab-mod" that is used to specify the required modifier keys to escape from the mouse grabbing mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> --- qapi/ui.json | 26 ++++++++++++++- include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 2 -- softmmu/globals.c | 2 -- softmmu/vl.c | 70 +---------------------------------------- ui/sdl2.c | 10 ++++++ 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) diff --git a/qapi/ui.json b/qapi/ui.json index 11a827d10f..413371d5e8 100644 --- a/qapi/ui.json +++ b/qapi/ui.json @@ -1295,6 +1295,29 @@ '*swap-opt-cmd': 'bool' } }+##+# @HotKeyMod: +# +# Set of modifier keys that need to be held for shortcut key actions. +# +# Since: 7.1 +## +{ 'enum' : 'HotKeyMod', + 'data' : [ 'lctrl-lalt', 'lshift-lctrl-lalt', 'rctrl' ] }I have a somewhat uneasy feeling about encoding what is essentially a subset of the sets of modifier keys as an enumeration, but it's what we have to do to QAPIfy existing grab-mod.
Well, that's exactly what you suggested here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-05/msg03401.html So I really don't understand your uneasy feeling now? ...
diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c index 57ab9d5322..484e9d9921 100644 --- a/softmmu/vl.c +++ b/softmmu/vl.c @@ -1056,75 +1056,7 @@ static void parse_display(const char *p) exit(0); }- if (strstart(p, "sdl", &opts)) {- /* - * sdl DisplayType needs hand-crafted parser instead of - * parse_display_qapi() due to some options not in - * DisplayOptions, specifically: - * - ctrl_grab + alt_grab - * They can't be moved into the QAPI since they use underscores, - * thus they will get replaced by "grab-mod" in the long term - */ -#if defined(CONFIG_SDL) - dpy.type = DISPLAY_TYPE_SDL; - while (*opts) { - const char *nextopt; - - if (strstart(opts, ",grab-mod=", &nextopt)) { - opts = nextopt; - if (strstart(opts, "lshift-lctrl-lalt", &nextopt)) { - alt_grab = 1; - } else if (strstart(opts, "rctrl", &nextopt)) { - ctrl_grab = 1; - } else { - goto invalid_sdl_args; - } - } else if (strstart(opts, ",window-close=", &nextopt)) { - opts = nextopt; - dpy.has_window_close = true; - if (strstart(opts, "on", &nextopt)) { - dpy.window_close = true; - } else if (strstart(opts, "off", &nextopt)) { - dpy.window_close = false; - } else { - goto invalid_sdl_args; - } - } else if (strstart(opts, ",show-cursor=", &nextopt)) { - opts = nextopt; - dpy.has_show_cursor = true; - if (strstart(opts, "on", &nextopt)) { - dpy.show_cursor = true; - } else if (strstart(opts, "off", &nextopt)) { - dpy.show_cursor = false; - } else { - goto invalid_sdl_args; - } - } else if (strstart(opts, ",gl=", &nextopt)) { - opts = nextopt; - dpy.has_gl = true; - if (strstart(opts, "on", &nextopt)) { - dpy.gl = DISPLAYGL_MODE_ON; - } else if (strstart(opts, "core", &nextopt)) { - dpy.gl = DISPLAYGL_MODE_CORE; - } else if (strstart(opts, "es", &nextopt)) { - dpy.gl = DISPLAYGL_MODE_ES; - } else if (strstart(opts, "off", &nextopt)) { - dpy.gl = DISPLAYGL_MODE_OFF; - } else { - goto invalid_sdl_args; - } - } else { - invalid_sdl_args: - error_report("invalid SDL option string"); - exit(1); - } - opts = nextopt; - } -#else - error_report("SDL display supported is not available in this binary"); - exit(1); -#endifWhen CONFIG_SDL is off, the error message changes from qemu-system-x86_64: -display sdl: SDL display supported is not available in this binary to qemu-system-x86_64: -display sdl: Parameter 'type' does not accept value 'sdl' I don't mind, but I'd suggest to mention it in the commit message.
I can do that if I have to respin this series for some other reasons. Otherwise, I don't think this really severe enough to justify a v4.
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Thanks! Thomas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |