Re: [PATCH] tests/tcg/s390x: Use a different PCRel32 notation in branch-relative-long.c

[Thomas Huth]

On 04/05/2022 00.46, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 21:26 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 03/05/2022 11.02, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > On 02/05/2022 18.48, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > > > Binutils >=2.37 and Clang do not accept (. - 0x100000000) PCRel32
> > > > constants. While this looks like a bug that needs fixing, use a
> > > > different notation (-0x100000000) as a workaround.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    tests/tcg/s390x/branch-relative-long.c | 4 ++--
> > > >    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/branch-relative-long.c
> > > > b/tests/tcg/s390x/branch-relative-long.c
> > > > index 94219afcad..8ce9f1c2e5 100644
> > > > --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/branch-relative-long.c
> > > > +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/branch-relative-long.c
> > > > @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
> > > >            #_name "_end:\n");
> > > >    DEFINE_ASM(br_r14, "br %r14");
> > > > -DEFINE_ASM(brasl_r0, "brasl %r0,.-0x100000000");
> > > > -DEFINE_ASM(brcl_0xf, "brcl 0xf,.-0x100000000");
> > > > +DEFINE_ASM(brasl_r0, "brasl %r0,-0x100000000");
> > > > +DEFINE_ASM(brcl_0xf, "brcl 0xf,-0x100000000");
> > >
> > > Works for me, thanks!
> >
> > Sorry, I spoke too soon - it compiles fine, and also runs fine when I
> > run it
> > natively, but when I run it through "qemu-s390x", it crashes... does
> > that
> > work for you?
>
> Hi, yes, I just double-checked - it works fine for me.
> Could you please share the resulting test binary?


Sure, here it is:

https://people.redhat.com/~thuth/data/branch-relative-long

 Thomas