Re: [PATCH v9 Kernel 2/5] vfio iommu: Add ioctl defination to get dirty pages bitmap.

[Yan Zhao]

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:34:57AM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 23:40:25 +0530
> Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On 12/3/2019 11:34 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:57:39 -0500
> > > Yan Zhao <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >   
> > >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 05:06:25AM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:  
> > >>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:26:07 +0530
> > >>> Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >>>      
> > >>>> On 11/14/2019 1:37 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:  
> > >>>>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:07:21 +0530
> > >>>>> Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >>>>>        
> > >>>>>> On 11/13/2019 4:00 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:  
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:33:37 +0530
> > >>>>>>> Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>           
> > >>>>>>>> All pages pinned by vendor driver through vfio_pin_pages API 
> > >>>>>>>> should be
> > >>>>>>>> considered as dirty during migration. IOMMU container maintains a 
> > >>>>>>>> list of
> > >>>>>>>> all such pinned pages. Added an ioctl defination to get bitmap of 
> > >>>>>>>> such  
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> definition
> > >>>>>>>           
> > >>>>>>>> pinned pages for requested IO virtual address range.  
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Additionally, all mapped pages are considered dirty when physically
> > >>>>>>> mapped through to an IOMMU, modulo we discussed devices opting in to
> > >>>>>>> per page pinning to indicate finer granularity with a TBD mechanism 
> > >>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>> figure out if any non-opt-in devices remain.
> > >>>>>>>           
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> You mean, in case of device direct assignment (device pass through)? 
> > >>>>>>  
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Yes, or IOMMU backed mdevs.  If vfio_dmas in the container are fully
> > >>>>> pinned and mapped, then the correct dirty page set is all mapped 
> > >>>>> pages.
> > >>>>> We discussed using the vpfn list as a mechanism for vendor drivers to
> > >>>>> reduce their migration footprint, but we also discussed that we would
> > >>>>> need a way to determine that all participants in the container have
> > >>>>> explicitly pinned their working pages or else we must consider the
> > >>>>> entire potential working set as dirty.
> > >>>>>        
> > >>>>
> > >>>> How can vendor driver tell this capability to iommu module? Any 
> > >>>> suggestions?  
> > >>>
> > >>> I think it does so by pinning pages.  Is it acceptable that if the
> > >>> vendor driver pins any pages, then from that point forward we consider
> > >>> the IOMMU group dirty page scope to be limited to pinned pages?  There  
> > >> we should also be aware of that dirty page scope is pinned pages + 
> > >> unpinned pages,
> > >> which means ever since a page is pinned, it should be regarded as dirty
> > >> no matter whether it's unpinned later. only after log_sync is called and
> > >> dirty info retrieved, its dirty state should be cleared.  
> > > 
> > > Yes, good point.  We can't just remove a vpfn when a page is unpinned
> > > or else we'd lose information that the page potentially had been
> > > dirtied while it was pinned.  Maybe that vpfn needs to move to a dirty
> > > list and both the currently pinned vpfns and the dirty vpfns are walked
> > > on a log_sync.  The dirty vpfns list would be cleared after a log_sync.
> > > The container would need to know that dirty tracking is enabled and
> > > only manage the dirty vpfns list when necessary.  Thanks,
> > >   
> > 
> > If page is unpinned, then that page is available in free page pool for 
> > others to use, then how can we say that unpinned page has valid data?
> > 
> > If suppose, one driver A unpins a page and when driver B of some other 
> > device gets that page and he pins it, uses it, and then unpins it, then 
> > how can we say that page has valid data for driver A?
> > 
> > Can you give one example where unpinned page data is considered reliable 
> > and valid?
> 
> We can only pin pages that the user has already allocated* and mapped
> through the vfio DMA API.  The pinning of the page simply locks the
> page for the vendor driver to access it and unpinning that page only
> indicates that access is complete.  Pages are not freed when a vendor
> driver unpins them, they still exist and at this point we're now
> assuming the device dirtied the page while it was pinned.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
> * An exception here is that the page might be demand allocated and the
>   act of pinning the page could actually allocate the backing page for
>   the user if they have not faulted the page to trigger that allocation
>   previously.  That page remains mapped for the user's virtual address
>   space even after the unpinning though.
>

Yes, I can give an example in GVT.
when a gem_object is allocated in guest, before submitting it to guest
vGPU, gfx cmds in its ring buffer need to be pinned into GGTT to get a
global graphics address for hardware access. At that time, we shadow
those cmds and pin pages through vfio pin_pages(), and submit the shadow
gem_object to physial hardware.
After guest driver thinks the submitted gem_object has completed hardware
DMA, it unnpinnd those pinned GGTT graphics memory addresses. Then in
host, we unpin the shadow pages through vfio unpin_pages.
But, at this point, guest driver is still free to access the gem_object
through vCPUs, and guest user space is probably still mapping an object
into the gem_object in guest driver.
So, missing the dirty page tracking for unpinned pages would cause
data inconsitency.

Thanks
Yan