[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live? |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:55:54 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
* Markus Armbruster (address@hidden) wrote:
> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On 02/12/2019 13.56, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 12:15, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> >>> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> * Daniel P. Berrangé (address@hidden) wrote:
> >>>>> My main objection to 'contrib/' is actually the perceived notions
> >>>>> about what the contrib directory is for. When I see 'contrib/'
> >>>>> code in either QEMU, or other open source projects, my general
> >>>>> impression is that this is largely unsupported code which is just
> >>>>> there as it might be interesting to someone, and doesn't typically
> >>>>> get much ongoing dev attention.
> >>>
> >>>>> virtiofsd is definitely different as it is intended to be a
> >>>>> fully production quality supported tool with active dev into
> >>>>> the future IIUC.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IOW, if we did decide we want it in QEMU, then instead of
> >>>>> '$GIT/contrib/virtiofsd', I'd prefer to see '$GIT/virtiofsd'.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not sure it deserves a new top level for such a specific tool.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe, but I think I agree with Daniel that 'contrib/' is
> >>> probably not the right place for it if it's something that
> >>> we care about supporting. 'contrib' to me is "bucket of stuff
> >>> that we didn't really feel strongly we wanted to reject but
> >>> which is probably random special-cases or other obscure
> >>> stuff, don't bother looking in here and don't assume it's
> >>> going to work either".
> >>
> >> Agree.
> >>
> >> We have source for several separate programs in the root directory
> >> already: qemu-bridge-helper, qemu-edid, qemu-img, qemu-io, qemu-nbd,
> >> qemu-keymap, qemu-seccomp, qemu-ga. Just a .c file when that suffixes,
> >> else a subdirectory, except for qemu-io, which is two .c files in the
> >> root, plus include/qemu-io.h. Putting virtiofsd/ there follows
> >> qemu-ga's precedence.
> >
> > IMHO the root directory is still way too overcrowded. Maybe we should
> > simply introduce a "tools" subdirectory?
>
> Maybe. In general, I prefer my source trees shallow.
I think I agree with Thomas that it should be in a subdirectory for all
tools like that; creating virtiofsd at the top level feels wrong to me
since it's just too specific. Someone please pick a name :-)
> We've sucked at keeping new files out of the root that don't belong
> there. Mending our ways going forward is just one half of the fix. The
> other half is cleaning up the mess we made.
It's been getting better over time mostly.
We could lose qemu-bridge-helper.c into this new directory.
Dave
> The manual should be somewhere below docs/.
>
> Several .[ch] should be in a suitable subdirectory.
>
> $ git-ls-files | grep -v / | grep '\.[ch]$'
> arch_init.c
> balloon.c
> block.c
> blockdev-nbd.c
> blockdev.c
> blockjob.c
> bootdevice.c
> bt-host.c
> bt-vhci.c
> cpus-common.c
> cpus.c
> device-hotplug.c
> device_tree.c
> disas.c
> dma-helpers.c
> exec-vary.c
> exec.c
> gdbstub.c
> ioport.c
> iothread.c
> job-qmp.c
> job.c
> memory.c
> memory_ldst.inc.c
> memory_mapping.c
> module-common.c
> os-posix.c
> os-win32.c
> qdev-monitor.c
> qemu-bridge-helper.c
> qemu-edid.c
> qemu-img.c
> qemu-io-cmds.c
> qemu-io.c
> qemu-keymap.c
> qemu-nbd.c
> qemu-options-wrapper.h
> qemu-options.h
> qemu-seccomp.c
> qtest.c
> replication.c
> replication.h
> thunk.c
> tpm.c
> vl.c
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2019/12/02
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Peter Maydell, 2019/12/02
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Markus Armbruster, 2019/12/02
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Peter Maydell, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Markus Armbruster, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Gerd Hoffmann, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Kevin Wolf, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Thomas Huth, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Eric Blake, 2019/12/04