[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] file-posix: add tracking of the zone write pointers
From: |
Sam Li |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] file-posix: add tracking of the zone write pointers |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Apr 2023 21:42:11 +0800 |
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> 于2023年4月10日周一 21:04写道:
>
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 04:16:54PM +0800, Sam Li wrote:
> > Since Linux doesn't have a user API to issue zone append operations to
> > zoned devices from user space, the file-posix driver is modified to add
> > zone append emulation using regular writes. To do this, the file-posix
> > driver tracks the wp location of all zones of the device. It uses an
> > array of uint64_t. The most significant bit of each wp location indicates
> > if the zone type is conventional zones.
> >
> > The zones wp can be changed due to the following operations issued:
> > - zone reset: change the wp to the start offset of that zone
> > - zone finish: change to the end location of that zone
> > - write to a zone
> > - zone append
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Li <faithilikerun@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > block/file-posix.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/block/block-common.h | 14 +++
> > include/block/block_int-common.h | 5 +
> > 3 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
> > index 65efe5147e..e7957f5559 100644
> > --- a/block/file-posix.c
> > +++ b/block/file-posix.c
> > @@ -1324,6 +1324,90 @@ static int hdev_get_max_segments(int fd, struct stat
> > *st)
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_BLKZONED)
> > +/*
> > + * If the reset_all flag is true, then the wps of zone whose state is
> > + * not readonly or offline should be all reset to the start sector.
> > + * Else, take the real wp of the device.
> > + */
> > +static int get_zones_wp(BlockDriverState *bs, int fd, int64_t offset,
> > + unsigned int nrz, bool reset_all)
> > +{
> > + struct blk_zone *blkz;
> > + size_t rep_size;
> > + uint64_t sector = offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> > + BlockZoneWps *wps = bs->wps;
> > + int j = offset / bs->bl.zone_size;
> > + int ret, n = 0, i = 0;
>
> I would feel more comfortable if i, j, and n were unsigned int like nrz.
> That way we don't need to worry about negative array indices when int
> wraps to INT_MIN.
>
> In practice we'll probably hit scalability problems before nrz becomes
> greater than INT_MAX. Also, such devices probably don't exist. A 5 TB
> drive with 256 MB zones only has 20,480 zones.
>
> So for now I think you can keep the code the way it is.
>
> > + rep_size = sizeof(struct blk_zone_report) + nrz * sizeof(struct
> > blk_zone);
> > + g_autofree struct blk_zone_report *rep = NULL;
> > +
> > + rep = g_malloc(rep_size);
> > + blkz = (struct blk_zone *)(rep + 1);
> > + while (n < nrz) {
> > + memset(rep, 0, rep_size);
> > + rep->sector = sector;
> > + rep->nr_zones = nrz - n;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + ret = ioctl(fd, BLKREPORTZONE, rep);
> > + } while (ret != 0 && errno == EINTR);
> > + if (ret != 0) {
> > + error_report("%d: ioctl BLKREPORTZONE at %" PRId64 " failed
> > %d",
> > + fd, offset, errno);
> > + return -errno;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!rep->nr_zones) {
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < rep->nr_zones; ++i, ++n, ++j) {
> > + /*
> > + * The wp tracking cares only about sequential writes required
> > and
> > + * sequential write preferred zones so that the wp can advance
> > to
> > + * the right location.
> > + * Use the most significant bit of the wp location to indicate
> > the
> > + * zone type: 0 for SWR/SWP zones and 1 for conventional zones.
> > + */
> > + if (blkz[i].type == BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL) {
> > + wps->wp[j] |= 1ULL << 63;
> > + } else {
> > + switch(blkz[i].cond) {
> > + case BLK_ZONE_COND_FULL:
> > + case BLK_ZONE_COND_READONLY:
> > + /* Zone not writable */
> > + wps->wp[j] = (blkz[i].start + blkz[i].len) <<
> > BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> > + break;
> > + case BLK_ZONE_COND_OFFLINE:
> > + /* Zone not writable nor readable */
> > + wps->wp[j] = (blkz[i].start) << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + if (reset_all) {
> > + wps->wp[j] = blkz[i].start << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> > + } else {
> > + wps->wp[j] = blkz[i].wp << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> > + }
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + sector = blkz[i - 1].start + blkz[i - 1].len;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void update_zones_wp(BlockDriverState *bs, int fd, int64_t offset,
> > + unsigned int nrz)
> > +{
> > + if (get_zones_wp(bs, fd, offset, nrz, 0) < 0) {
> > + error_report("update zone wp failed");
> > + }
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > static void raw_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
> > {
> > BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> > @@ -1413,6 +1497,23 @@ static void raw_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs,
> > Error **errp)
> > if (ret >= 0) {
> > bs->bl.max_active_zones = ret;
> > }
> > +
> > + ret = get_sysfs_long_val(&st, "physical_block_size");
> > + if (ret >= 0) {
> > + bs->bl.write_granularity = ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* The refresh_limits() function can be called multiple times. */
> > + g_free(bs->wps);
> > + bs->wps = g_malloc(sizeof(BlockZoneWps) +
> > + sizeof(int64_t) * bs->bl.nr_zones);
> > + ret = get_zones_wp(bs, s->fd, 0, bs->bl.nr_zones, 0);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "report wps failed");
> > + bs->wps = NULL;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + qemu_co_mutex_init(&bs->wps->colock);
>
> I suggest moving qemu_co_mutex_init() to raw_open_common() in the future
> to eliminate the assumption that raw_refresh_limits() is called before
> other functions that use colock. But there is no need to resend the
> patch series.
Ok, I see. This can be done in the future. Thanks!
>
> > return;
> > }
> > out:
> > @@ -2338,9 +2439,15 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_prw(BlockDriverState
> > *bs, uint64_t offset,
> > {
> > BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> > RawPosixAIOData acb;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > if (fd_open(bs) < 0)
> > return -EIO;
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_BLKZONED)
> > + if (type & QEMU_AIO_WRITE && bs->wps) {
> > + qemu_co_mutex_lock(&bs->wps->colock);
> > + }
> > +#endif
> >
> > /*
> > * When using O_DIRECT, the request must be aligned to be able to use
> > @@ -2354,14 +2461,16 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_prw(BlockDriverState
> > *bs, uint64_t offset,
> > } else if (s->use_linux_io_uring) {
> > LuringState *aio =
> > aio_get_linux_io_uring(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs));
> > assert(qiov->size == bytes);
> > - return luring_co_submit(bs, aio, s->fd, offset, qiov, type);
> > + ret = luring_co_submit(bs, aio, s->fd, offset, qiov, type);
> > + goto out;
> > #endif
> > #ifdef CONFIG_LINUX_AIO
> > } else if (s->use_linux_aio) {
> > LinuxAioState *aio = aio_get_linux_aio(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs));
> > assert(qiov->size == bytes);
> > - return laio_co_submit(bs, aio, s->fd, offset, qiov, type,
> > + ret = laio_co_submit(bs, aio, s->fd, offset, qiov, type,
> > s->aio_max_batch);
> > + goto out;
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2378,7 +2487,32 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_prw(BlockDriverState
> > *bs, uint64_t offset,
> > };
> >
> > assert(qiov->size == bytes);
> > - return raw_thread_pool_submit(bs, handle_aiocb_rw, &acb);
> > + ret = raw_thread_pool_submit(bs, handle_aiocb_rw, &acb);
> > +
> > +out:
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_BLKZONED)
> > + BlockZoneWps *wps = bs->wps;
> > + if (ret == 0) {
> > + if (type & QEMU_AIO_WRITE && wps && bs->bl.zone_size) {
> > + uint64_t *wp = &wps->wp[offset / bs->bl.zone_size];
> > + if (!BDRV_ZT_IS_CONV(*wp)) {
> > + /* Advance the wp if needed */
> > + if (offset + bytes > *wp) {
> > + *wp = offset + bytes;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + if (type & QEMU_AIO_WRITE) {
> > + update_zones_wp(bs, s->fd, 0, 1);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (type & QEMU_AIO_WRITE && wps) {
> > + qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&wps->colock);
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static int coroutine_fn raw_co_preadv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
> > @@ -2486,6 +2620,9 @@ static void raw_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
> > BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> >
> > if (s->fd >= 0) {
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_BLKZONED)
> > + g_free(bs->wps);
> > +#endif
> > qemu_close(s->fd);
> > s->fd = -1;
> > }
> > @@ -3283,6 +3420,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn
> > raw_co_zone_mgmt(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockZoneOp op,
> > const char *op_name;
> > unsigned long zo;
> > int ret;
> > + BlockZoneWps *wps = bs->wps;
> > int64_t capacity = bs->total_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> >
> > zone_size = bs->bl.zone_size;
> > @@ -3300,6 +3438,15 @@ static int coroutine_fn
> > raw_co_zone_mgmt(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockZoneOp op,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&wps->colock);
> > + uint32_t i = offset / bs->bl.zone_size;
> > + uint32_t nrz = len / bs->bl.zone_size;
> > + uint64_t *wp = &wps->wp[i];
> > + if (BDRV_ZT_IS_CONV(*wp) && len != capacity) {
> > + error_report("zone mgmt operations are not allowed for
> > conventional zones");
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > switch (op) {
> > case BLK_ZO_OPEN:
> > op_name = "BLKOPENZONE";
> > @@ -3337,8 +3484,28 @@ static int coroutine_fn
> > raw_co_zone_mgmt(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockZoneOp op,
> > len >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
> > ret = raw_thread_pool_submit(bs, handle_aiocb_zone_mgmt, &acb);
> > if (ret != 0) {
> > + update_zones_wp(bs, s->fd, offset, i);
> > ret = -errno;
> > error_report("ioctl %s failed %d", op_name, ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (zo == BLKRESETZONE && len == capacity) {
> > + ret = get_zones_wp(bs, s->fd, 0, bs->bl.nr_zones, 1);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + error_report("reporting single wp failed");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + } else if (zo == BLKRESETZONE) {
> > + for (int j = 0; j < nrz; ++j) {
> > + wp[j] = offset + j * zone_size;
> > + }
> > + } else if (zo == BLKFINISHZONE) {
> > + for (int j = 0; j < nrz; ++j) {
> > + /* The zoned device allows the last zone smaller that the
> > + * zone size. */
> > + wp[j] = MIN(offset + (j + 1) * zone_size, offset + len);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > return ret;
> > diff --git a/include/block/block-common.h b/include/block/block-common.h
> > index 1576fcf2ed..93196229ac 100644
> > --- a/include/block/block-common.h
> > +++ b/include/block/block-common.h
> > @@ -118,6 +118,14 @@ typedef struct BlockZoneDescriptor {
> > BlockZoneState state;
> > } BlockZoneDescriptor;
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Track write pointers of a zone in bytes.
> > + */
> > +typedef struct BlockZoneWps {
> > + CoMutex colock;
> > + uint64_t wp[];
> > +} BlockZoneWps;
> > +
> > typedef struct BlockDriverInfo {
> > /* in bytes, 0 if irrelevant */
> > int cluster_size;
> > @@ -240,6 +248,12 @@ typedef enum {
> > #define BDRV_SECTOR_BITS 9
> > #define BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE (1ULL << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Get the first most significant bit of wp. If it is zero, then
> > + * the zone type is SWR.
> > + */
> > +#define BDRV_ZT_IS_CONV(wp) (wp & (1ULL << 63))
> > +
> > #define BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS MIN_CONST(SIZE_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, \
> > INT_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)
> > #define BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES (BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS <<
> > BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)
> > diff --git a/include/block/block_int-common.h
> > b/include/block/block_int-common.h
> > index 1bd2aef4d5..b34a7f175d 100644
> > --- a/include/block/block_int-common.h
> > +++ b/include/block/block_int-common.h
> > @@ -884,6 +884,8 @@ typedef struct BlockLimits {
> >
> > /* maximum number of active zones */
> > int64_t max_active_zones;
> > +
> > + int64_t write_granularity;
> > } BlockLimits;
> >
> > typedef struct BdrvOpBlocker BdrvOpBlocker;
> > @@ -1245,6 +1247,9 @@ struct BlockDriverState {
> > CoMutex bsc_modify_lock;
> > /* Always non-NULL, but must only be dereferenced under an RCU read
> > guard */
> > BdrvBlockStatusCache *block_status_cache;
> > +
> > + /* array of write pointers' location of each zone in the zoned device.
> > */
> > + BlockZoneWps *wps;
> > };
> >
> > struct BlockBackendRootState {
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
- [PATCH v9 0/4] Add zone append write for zoned device, Sam Li, 2023/04/07
- [PATCH v9 1/4] file-posix: add tracking of the zone write pointers, Sam Li, 2023/04/07
- [PATCH v9 2/4] block: introduce zone append write for zoned devices, Sam Li, 2023/04/07
- [PATCH v9 3/4] qemu-iotests: test zone append operation, Sam Li, 2023/04/07
- [PATCH v9 4/4] block: add some trace events for zone append, Sam Li, 2023/04/07
- Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add zone append write for zoned device, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2023/04/10