qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] hw/misc: Implement STM32L4x5 EXTI


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] hw/misc: Implement STM32L4x5 EXTI
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 23:56:20 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 8/1/24 19:03, Inès Varhol wrote:
Although very similar to the STM32F4xx EXTI, STM32L4x5 EXTI generates
more than 32 event/interrupt requests and thus uses more registers
than STM32F4xx EXTI which generates 23 event/interrupt requests.

Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Minier <arnaud.minier@telecom-paris.fr>
Signed-off-by: Inès Varhol <ines.varhol@telecom-paris.fr>
---

Should the for loop variables be `unsigned` rather than `int` ?

It depends on the iterated range. Here you iterate over
ARRAY_SIZE(Stm32l4x5ExtiState::irq) which is a size_t type,
which is unsigned. Amusingly we use both similarly:

$ git grep 'for (size_t' | wc -l
      56
$ git grep 'for (unsigned' | wc -l
      59

  docs/system/arm/b-l475e-iot01a.rst |   5 +-
  hw/misc/Kconfig                    |   3 +
  hw/misc/meson.build                |   1 +
  hw/misc/stm32l4x5_exti.c           | 292 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  hw/misc/trace-events               |   5 +
  include/hw/misc/stm32l4x5_exti.h   |  51 +++++
  6 files changed, 354 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 hw/misc/stm32l4x5_exti.c
  create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/stm32l4x5_exti.h

diff --git a/docs/system/arm/b-l475e-iot01a.rst 
b/docs/system/arm/b-l475e-iot01a.rst
index 2b128e6b84..72f256ace7 100644
--- a/docs/system/arm/b-l475e-iot01a.rst
+++ b/docs/system/arm/b-l475e-iot01a.rst
@@ -12,17 +12,16 @@ USART, I2C, SPI, CAN and USB OTG, as well as a variety of 
sensors.
  Supported devices
  """""""""""""""""
-Currently, B-L475E-IOT01A machine's implementation is minimal,
-it only supports the following device:
+Currently B-L475E-IOT01A machine's only supports the following devices:
- Cortex-M4F based STM32L4x5 SoC
+- STM32L4x5 EXTI (Extended interrupts and events controller)
Missing devices
  """""""""""""""
The B-L475E-IOT01A does *not* support the following devices: -- Extended interrupts and events controller (EXTI)
  - Reset and clock control (RCC)
  - Serial ports (UART)
  - System configuration controller (SYSCFG)
diff --git a/hw/misc/Kconfig b/hw/misc/Kconfig
index cc8a8c1418..3efe3dc2cc 100644
--- a/hw/misc/Kconfig
+++ b/hw/misc/Kconfig
@@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ config STM32F4XX_SYSCFG
  config STM32F4XX_EXTI
      bool
+config STM32L4X5_EXTI
+    bool
+
  config MIPS_ITU
      bool
diff --git a/hw/misc/meson.build b/hw/misc/meson.build
index 36c20d5637..16db6e228d 100644
--- a/hw/misc/meson.build
+++ b/hw/misc/meson.build
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_XLNX_VERSAL_TRNG', if_true: 
files(
  system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_STM32F2XX_SYSCFG', if_true: 
files('stm32f2xx_syscfg.c'))
  system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_STM32F4XX_SYSCFG', if_true: 
files('stm32f4xx_syscfg.c'))
  system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_STM32F4XX_EXTI', if_true: 
files('stm32f4xx_exti.c'))
+system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_STM32L4X5_EXTI', if_true: 
files('stm32l4x5_exti.c'))
  system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_MPS2_FPGAIO', if_true: files('mps2-fpgaio.c'))
  system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_MPS2_SCC', if_true: files('mps2-scc.c'))
diff --git a/hw/misc/stm32l4x5_exti.c b/hw/misc/stm32l4x5_exti.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..aedf1fb370
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hw/misc/stm32l4x5_exti.c
@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+/*
+ * STM32L4x5 EXTI (Extended interrupts and events controller)
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Arnaud Minier <arnaud.minier@telecom-paris.fr>
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Samuel Tardieu <samuel.tardieu@telecom-paris.fr>
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Inès Varhol <ines.varhol@telecom-paris.fr>
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
+ * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
+ *
+ * This work is based on the stm32f4xx_exti by Alistair Francis.
+ * Original code is licensed under the MIT License:
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2014 Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
+ */
+
+/*
+ * The reference used is the STMicroElectronics RM0351 Reference manual
+ * for STM32L4x5 and STM32L4x6 advanced Arm ® -based 32-bit MCUs.
+ * 
https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32l4x5/documentation.html
+ */
+
+#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "qemu/log.h"
+#include "trace.h"
+#include "hw/irq.h"
+#include "migration/vmstate.h"
+#include "hw/misc/stm32l4x5_exti.h"
+
+#define EXTI_IMR1   0x00
+#define EXTI_EMR1   0x04
+#define EXTI_RTSR1  0x08
+#define EXTI_FTSR1  0x0C
+#define EXTI_SWIER1 0x10
+#define EXTI_PR1    0x14

+#define EXTI_IMR2   0x20
+#define EXTI_EMR2   0x24
+#define EXTI_RTSR2  0x28
+#define EXTI_FTSR2  0x2C
+#define EXTI_SWIER2 0x30
+#define EXTI_PR2    0x34
+
+#define EXTI_NUM_GPIO_EVENT_IN_LINES 16

  #define EXTI_MAX_IRQ_PER_BANK 32

+
+/* 0b11111111_10000010_00000000_00000000 */
+#define DIRECT_LINE_MASK1 0xFF820000
+/* 0b00000000_00000000_00000000_10000111 */
+#define DIRECT_LINE_MASK2 0x00000087
+/* 0b11111111_11111111_11111111_00000000 */
+#define RESERVED_BITS_MASK2 0xFFFFFF00
+
+/* 0b00000000_00000000_00000000_01111000 */
+#define ACTIVABLE_MASK2 (~DIRECT_LINE_MASK2 & ~RESERVED_BITS_MASK2)


You might want to declare:

  #define EXTI_IRQS_BANK0  32
  #define EXTI_IRQS_BANK1  8

  static const unsigned irqs_per_bank[EXTI_NUM_REGISTER] = {
      EXTI_IRQS_BANK0,
      EXTI_IRQS_BANK1,
  };

  static const uint32_t exti_romask[EXTI_NUM_REGISTER] = {
      0xff820000, /* 0b11111111_10000010_00000000_00000000 */
      0x00000087, /* 0b00000000_00000000_00000000_10000111 */
  };

And add descriptive helpers such:

static unsigned regbank_index_by_irq(unsigned irq)
{
    return irq >= EXTI_MAX_IRQ_PER_BANK ? 1 : 0;
}

static unsigned regbank_index_by_addr(hwaddr addr)
{
    return addr >= EXTI_IMR2 ? 1 : 0;
}

static unsigned valid_mask(unsigned bank)
{
    return MAKE_64BIT_MASK(0, irqs_per_bank[bank]);
}

(then see below)

+static void stm32l4x5_exti_reset_hold(Object *obj)
+{
+    Stm32l4x5ExtiState *s = STM32L4X5_EXTI(obj);
+
+    s->imr[0] = DIRECT_LINE_MASK1;
+    s->emr[0] = 0x00000000;
+    s->rtsr[0] = 0x00000000;
+    s->ftsr[0] = 0x00000000;
+    s->swier[0] = 0x00000000;
+    s->pr[0] = 0x00000000;
+
+    s->imr[1] = DIRECT_LINE_MASK2;
+    s->emr[1] = 0x00000000;
+    s->rtsr[1] = 0x00000000;
+    s->ftsr[1] = 0x00000000;
+    s->swier[1] = 0x00000000;
+    s->pr[1] = 0x00000000;
+}

BTW stm32l4x5_exti_reset_hold() can also be unified:

   static void stm32l4x5_exti_reset_hold(Object *obj)
   {
       Stm32l4x5ExtiState *s = STM32L4X5_EXTI(obj);

       for (unsigned bank = 0; bank < EXTI_NUM_REGISTER; bank++) {
           s->imr[bank] = exti_romask[bank];
           s->emr[bank] = 0;
           s->rtsr[bank] = 0;
           s->ftsr[bank] = 0;
           s->swier[bank] = 0;
           s->pr[bank] = 0;
       }
   }

+static void stm32l4x5_exti_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
+{
+    Stm32l4x5ExtiState *s = opaque;
+    const unsigned n = irq >= 32;

Then:

      n = regbank_index_by_irq(irq);

Maybe 'bank' is a better variable name instead of 'n', in particular
in stm32l4x5_exti_read() it makes it clear registers behave identically
for each bank of registers.

+    const int oirq = irq;
+
+    trace_stm32l4x5_exti_set_irq(irq, level);
+
+    if (irq >= 32) {
+        /* Shift the value to enable access in x2 registers. */
+        irq -= 32;
+    }

Alternatively:

      irq %= EXTI_MAX_IRQ_PER_BANK;

+    /* If the interrupt is masked, pr won't be raised */
+    if (!((1 << irq) & s->imr[n])) {

Alternatively:

       if (!extract32(s->imr[n], irq, 1)) {

+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (((1 << irq) & s->rtsr[n]) && level) {
+        /* Rising Edge */
+        s->pr[n] |= 1 << irq;
+        qemu_irq_pulse(s->irq[oirq]);
+    } else if (((1 << irq) & s->ftsr[n]) && !level) {
+        /* Falling Edge */
+        s->pr[n] |= 1 << irq;
+        qemu_irq_pulse(s->irq[oirq]);
+    }

       else { // Can we get here?

+}
+
+static uint64_t stm32l4x5_exti_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
+                                    unsigned int size)
+{
+    Stm32l4x5ExtiState *s = opaque;
+    uint32_t r = 0;
+    const unsigned n = addr >= EXTI_IMR2;

      bank = regbank_index_by_addr(addr);

+
+    switch (addr) {
+    case EXTI_IMR1:
+    case EXTI_IMR2:
+        r = s->imr[n];
+        break;
+    case EXTI_EMR1:
+    case EXTI_EMR2:
+        r = s->emr[n];
+        break;
+    case EXTI_RTSR1:
+    case EXTI_RTSR2:
+        r = s->rtsr[n];
+        break;
+    case EXTI_FTSR1:
+    case EXTI_FTSR2:
+        r = s->ftsr[n];
+        break;
+    case EXTI_SWIER1:
+    case EXTI_SWIER2:
+        r = s->swier[n];
+        break;
+    case EXTI_PR1:
+    case EXTI_PR2:
+        r = s->pr[n];
+        break;
+
+    default:
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+                      "STM32L4X5_exti_read: Bad offset 0x%x\n", (int)addr);

Here you can avoid the cast by using the HWADDR_PRIx format.

+        break;
+    }
+
+    trace_stm32l4x5_exti_read(addr, r);
+
+    return r;
+}
+
+static void stm32l4x5_exti_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
+                                 uint64_t val64, unsigned int size)
+{
+    Stm32l4x5ExtiState *s = opaque;
+    const uint32_t value = (uint32_t)val64;

I don't see the benefit of casting to 32-bits, besides we have
".valid.max_access_size = 4" so the caller always pass 32-bits.

+
+    trace_stm32l4x5_exti_write(addr, value);
+
+    switch (addr) {
+    case EXTI_IMR1:
+        s->imr[0] = value;
+        return;

You can unify banks:

       case EXTI_IMR1:
       case EXTI_IMR2:
           s->imr[bank] = value & valid_mask(bank);
           return;

+    case EXTI_EMR1:
+        s->emr[0] = value;
+        return;

       case EXTI_EMR1:
       case EXTI_EMR2:
           s->emr[bank] = value & valid_mask(bank);
           return;

+    case EXTI_RTSR1:
+        s->rtsr[0] = value & ~DIRECT_LINE_MASK1;
+        return;

       case EXTI_RTSR1:
       case EXTI_RTSR2:
           s->rtsr[bank] = value & ~exti_romask[bank];
           return;

+    case EXTI_FTSR1:
+        s->ftsr[0] = value & ~DIRECT_LINE_MASK1;
+        return;

       case EXTI_FTSR1:
       case EXTI_FTSR2:
           s->ftsr[bank] = value & ~exti_romask[bank];
           return;

+    case EXTI_SWIER1: {
+        const uint32_t set1 = value & ~DIRECT_LINE_MASK1;
+        const uint32_t pend1 = set1 & ~s->swier[0] & s->imr[0] & ~s->pr[0];
+        s->swier[0] = set1;
+        s->pr[0] |= pend1;
+        for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+            if (pend1 & (1 << i)) {
+                qemu_irq_pulse(s->irq[i]);
+            }
+        }
+        return;

     case EXTI_SWIER1:
     case EXTI_SWIER2:
          set = value & ~exti_romask[bank];
          pend = set & ~s->swier[bank] & s->imr[bank] & ~s->pr[bank];
          s->swier[bank] = set;
          s->pr[bank] |= pend;
          for (unsigned i = 0; i < irqs_per_bank[bank]; i++) {
              if (pend & (1 << i)) { // or extract32()
                  qemu_irq_pulse(s->irq[i]);
              }
          }
          return;

+    }
+    case EXTI_PR1: {
+        const uint32_t cleared1 = s->pr[0] & value & ~DIRECT_LINE_MASK1;
+        /* This bit is cleared by writing a 1 to it */
+        s->pr[0] &= ~cleared1;
+        /* Software triggered interrupts are cleared as well */
+        s->swier[0] &= ~cleared1;
+        return;

Ditto.

+    }
+    case EXTI_IMR2:
+        s->imr[1] = value & ~RESERVED_BITS_MASK2;
+        return;
+    case EXTI_EMR2:
+        s->emr[1] = value & ~RESERVED_BITS_MASK2;
+        return;
+    case EXTI_RTSR2:
+        s->rtsr[1] = value & ACTIVABLE_MASK2;
+        return;
+    case EXTI_FTSR2:
+        s->ftsr[1] = value & ACTIVABLE_MASK2;
+        return;
+    case EXTI_SWIER2: {
+        const uint32_t set2 = value & ACTIVABLE_MASK2;
+        const uint32_t pend2 = set2 & ~s->swier[1] & s->imr[1] & ~s->pr[1];
+        s->swier[1] = set2;
+        s->pr[1] |= pend2;
+        for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
+            if (pend2 & (1 << i)) {
+                qemu_irq_pulse(s->irq[32 + i]);
+            }
+        }
+        return;
+    }
+    case EXTI_PR2: {
+        const uint32_t cleared = s->pr[1] & value & ACTIVABLE_MASK2;
+        /* This bit is cleared by writing a 1 to it */
+        s->pr[1] &= ~cleared;
+        /* Software triggered interrupts are cleared as well */
+        s->swier[1] &= ~cleared;
+        return;
+    }
+    default:
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+                      "STM32L4X5_exti_write: Bad offset 0x%x\n", (int)addr);
+    }
+}
+
+static const MemoryRegionOps stm32l4x5_exti_ops = {
+    .read = stm32l4x5_exti_read,
+    .write = stm32l4x5_exti_write,
+    .endianness = DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN,
+    .impl.min_access_size = 4,
+    .impl.max_access_size = 4,
+    .impl.unaligned = false,
+    .valid.min_access_size = 4,
+    .valid.max_access_size = 4,
+    .valid.unaligned = false,
+};

Code totally untested =)

Regards,

Phil.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]