Re: RFC: goals for rewritten output subsystem

[Jason Stover]

I agree that it's a good summary - neither too detailed nor too broad.

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:49:17PM +0800, John Darrington wrote:
> I think this is a good summary of what we need.  The only things I
> would add are:
> 
> * I would make item 4 a secondary goal.  Anyone who runs a procedure
>   which creates a table larger than the memory of any modernish
>   machine has probably made a mistake.

I think I agree with this, depending on what we mean by the word "table".

So how do you want to do it?

-Jason