[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Long-name/short-name complexity
From: |
Wilson,Tom |
Subject: |
RE: Long-name/short-name complexity |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:37:19 -0400 |
I see what SPSS did as a bug and not a feature. It should have renamed
the original variables.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Ben Pfaff
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 11:34 AM
To: Wilson,Tom
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Long-name/short-name complexity
"Wilson,Tom" <address@hidden> writes:
> I have encountered some strange things when going back and forth
> between versions of SPSS that support long variable names and versions
> that don't. As I recall, the situtation went a little like this. We
> created a data file in SPSS 11.5 that had short variable names.
> Someone else opened it in SPSS 12.0 and renamed the short variable
> names to long variable names that were completely different. When the
> file was opened in SPSS 11.5 the variables did not appear to be
renamed.
Interesting. Perhaps SPSS does maintain separate long and short names.
I'm not too happy about the idea of maintaining separate names--it makes
the code complex and ugly.
We will have to do some testing.
--
"...Slashdot is built on loyalty and trust, not on traditional business
precepts."
--Robin Miller
- Long-name/short-name complexity, Ben Pfaff, 2005/04/24
- Re: Long-name/short-name complexity, John Darrington, 2005/04/24
- Re: Long-name/short-name complexity, Ben Pfaff, 2005/04/24
- Re: Long-name/short-name complexity, John Darrington, 2005/04/24
- Re: Long-name/short-name complexity, Ben Pfaff, 2005/04/24
- Re: Long-name/short-name complexity, John Darrington, 2005/04/25
- Re: Long-name/short-name complexity, Ben Pfaff, 2005/04/25
- Re: Long-name/short-name complexity, John Darrington, 2005/04/25