[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Paparazzi-devel] which stabilization subsystem is more stable ?
From: |
Eltonwu |
Subject: |
[Paparazzi-devel] which stabilization subsystem is more stable ? |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:57:28 -0700 (MST) |
In the wiki page, I found 4 stabilization subsystem:
int_quat
float_quat
int_euler
float_euler
In my opinion,performance of float is more powerful than int. Am I right?
another question is which is more stable between quat and euler? In the wiki
page I found quat is no gimal lock so it can fly in regimes close or at
these singularities (e.g. acrobatics or transitioning vehicles). I just want
fly more stable and take pictures.so It make more sense to use eluer instead
of quat (search the source code I found the kroozSD use the int_euler, so I
think euler is more stable than quat?)
Thank you very much in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lists.paparazziuav.org/which-stabilization-subsystem-is-more-stable-tp16577.html
Sent from the paparazzi-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [Paparazzi-devel] which stabilization subsystem is more stable ?,
Eltonwu <=