|
From: | Eduardo lavratti |
Subject: | Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Octocopter flight time record |
Date: | Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:34:17 -0300 |
I prefer the Sergey version.
Big props is a problem when flying in the wind. The inertia is a big problem too. > From: address@hidden > Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:01:48 -0300 > To: address@hidden > Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Octocopter flight time record > > > It’s 7 minutes short of Ferdinand Kickinger’s record: http://vimeo.com/84302289 > > What I find amazing is that you use 6s instead of 12s and 17” props instead of 28”, but still got very similar results. > > What was the reason to rewind the 5010 motors, did you lower the kV? > > G> > > > On Oct 14, 2014, at 18:42, Simon Liebold <address@hidden> wrote: > > > Sergey, > > > > That is amazing! I never thought multicopters could have an endurance > > like that. The battery alone must have a mass of almost 2kg. > > > > Simon > > > > p.s. I have the same model of RC controller in use. > > > > > > Am 14.10.2014 um 15:57 schrieb Felix Ruess: > >> Hi Sergey, > >> > >>> Achieved flight time is 2h 2min 20s. Pretty good... > >> > >> That's a bit of an understatement ;-) > >> That's really great! > >> > >> What is the net/total weight of the system? > >> > >> Congratulations, > >> Felix > >> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Paparazzi-devel mailing list > > address@hidden > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Paparazzi-devel mailing list > address@hidden > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |