[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning
From: |
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:33:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-DE; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030619 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
Hi,
a more efficient system is backstapping, a model based system.
If you want to integrate in paparazzi i can send you a paper of it.
The basic idea is to use not a feedback control system for the
stabilization.
Instead the the rate signals are multiplied with a negative factor
and the result is used for the generation of the basic signals trust,
roll pitch and yaw.
The stick signals are direct used the additionally.
I can send you same papers of it.
I wrote togehter with pione a paper. I use backstepping since six
years for my one muticopter software. It works perfect and generate less
vibrations.
I think you need less than 30 lines of code to implement it in paparazzi.
But it is difficult to find out where to change the code.
Regads
Heinrich
Eltonwu schrieb:
Currently I try to tune the PID params of attitude more efficient.The
performance of the PID is not still satisfied.If I operate the stick gently.
the copter perform steady and no oscillation,but if I operate the stick
roughly,such as perform a brake suddenly when the copter speed is very high
speed. the copter oscillate very much about 500 ms and become steady.
the following is the curves when flying . Can anyone give me some
suggestion to improve the PID?
Thanks in advance
<define name="PHI_PGAIN" value="135"/>
<define name="PHI_DGAIN" value="88"/>
<define name="PHI_IGAIN" value="80"/>
<define name="PHI_DDGAIN" value="120"/>
<http://lists.paparazziuav.org/file/n16076/1358880.png>
<http://lists.paparazziuav.org/file/n16076/ff_1358880.png>
<define name="PHI_PGAIN" value="145"/>
<define name="PHI_DGAIN" value="88"/>
<define name="PHI_IGAIN" value="5"/>
<define name="PHI_DDGAIN" value="120"/>
<http://lists.paparazziuav.org/file/n16076/1458805.png>
<http://lists.paparazziuav.org/file/n16076/ff1458805.png>
--
View this message in context:
http://lists.paparazziuav.org/Any-suggestion-of-improvement-for-PID-tuning-tp16076.html
Sent from the paparazzi-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
- [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning, Eltonwu, 2014/09/03
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning,
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers <=
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning, Eduardo lavratti, 2014/09/04
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning, Hawk Wang, 2014/09/04
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning, Eltonwu, 2014/09/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning, Felix Ruess, 2014/09/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning, Eltonwu, 2014/09/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning, Felix Ruess, 2014/09/11
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning, Eduardo lavratti, 2014/09/04