paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft


From: Gautier Hattenberger
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:21:08 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

Hi,

-sp should be the RC setpoint
-ref is the reference angle that the aircraft is tracking and it is calculated from the RC setpoint, so it should be very close
-est is the estimation, so your actual angle

Gautier

Le 24/07/2014 11:18, I. Sánchez Ciarrusta a écrit :
Hello again:
 
I was wrong. I need some information about theses graphics:
 
-What is exactly "STAB_ATTITUDE_INT:sp ?
-             "            "                                  :est?
-            "             "                         REF_INT:ref?
 
Trying to solve some of my questions, I made a test with the quad with 8º in phi and aprox. -2º in theta.
 
So now I think that "est" is the measured real angle, and ref the commanded angle. But what is "sp" why in my case, in theta sp is always 0 and in phi -3 (even if level)?
 
Anyone has any answer? Any comment is wellcome!
 
Thank you four your time:
 
Inaki

 

From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:56:17 +0000
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft

Hi all:
 
Please, I need your help to interpretate what my autopilot is trying to do in ATT mode (see the attached picture).
 
This is what I think: in red is the measured angles. As you can see, in theta I have 0 degrees and -3 in phi (due to some changes I made; I have too recalibrate).
 
In green, your can see the commanded angle. I think that in theta, the comanded angle should be 0, because is stabilized. However, the autopilot needs to stabilize Phi, and that´s why (in my opinion) he tries to have +3 degrees, to compensate de -3.
 
Due to the linkage between roll and pitch, that induces variations also in theta. But watching the image it seems that he is not capable to stablilizate (two of the motors are switched on and then changes to the other two, resulting theses curves)
Te test is made with the rotorcraft at groud.
 
What do you think? Is a normal behaviuour? How can I fix it? Any ideas?
 
Thanks again!
 
Inaki

 

From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:37:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft

Hi Kadir:
 
I am trying to make a better isoltaion, and I have improved the quad´s behaviour a little bit.
 
Nevertheless, when I increasethe throttle is (as you can see in these new graphs) the obtained accelerations are very bad. ALL the tests are made WITHOUT PROPELERS, only the motors.
Perhaps I should do smth with the ESCs or the motors?  I think that with these vibrations is really difficult to have good performances, but I'm still not sure that's the main cause of non-functioning of quad.

Thank you very much everyone for your help:

 
Inaki

 

Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:27:37 +0300
From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft

Hi, these vibrations are not related wıth INS subsystem, the source of this noise is basically the vibrations of the propellers and motors on acc sensors, you need better isolation and maybe you need to balance your propellers. ydd and xdd seems to be zero , can you recheck them?

Kadir


2014-07-22 0:49 GMT+03:00 I. Sánchez Ciarrusta <address@hidden>:
Hi all:

I attached two captures of the vibrations of INS:

You can see what happens when the engines are "on": the test are made with NO PROPELERS and de quad IN THE GROUND.

I want to know your expert opinion, but somth is wrong if (with que vehicle stayed at ground) the measured zdd acceleration has variations from 8m/s2 to -6m/s2, as you can see in the pictures.

I suppose that I have to improve the isolation, but, are the accelerometers working well? Is that measurement normal?

In the capture "vibrations2", you can see rounded in green the difference when I separate the board from the airframe.

Maybe one of my problems are those vibrations?

What do you think? 

Any advice is wellcome!!

Thanks in advance!

Inaki


From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:18:19 +0000

Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft

Thanks Oswald:
 
I think that now I have printed intertesting curves, in ATT and Rate mode.
 
In Att mode, you can see what happens when I turn on the engines,.
 
In Rate mode the behaviour is very different (if I have print the correct parameters).
 
I have made both tests with the quad in the ground, with no propellers and with the trottle at minimun, and with no orders from the RC.
 
Cheers:
 
Inaki
 

 
> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:09:07 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft
>
>
> hi again,
>
> from your images, i'm not quite sure what is the relation of rc_roll and
> cmd_roll? also, you seem to be in telemetry mode TUNE_HOVER which i
> suppose is for tuning the vertical controller.
>
> what you want is
> - Set telemetry mode to "attitude_loop"
>
> (or rate_loop if you want to tune rate mode).
>
> then you can see the commanded angle in
> STAB_ATTITUDE_REF_INT
>
> and the response (measurement) in
> STAB_ATTITUDE_INT
>
> you want to set your params s.t. these two curves match.
>
>
> before tuning, you might want to do the following sanity check:
> - tie down your copter so it can move just a bit (well, tie it down
> anyway, also for tuning)
> - check with the plotter wether your attitude estimation is ok at rest
> (motors off)
> - arm the system
> - give a bit of throttle, just before takeoff or around takeoff
> - observe wether the attitude estimate is still ok or wether something
> runs away ..
>
> for tuning rate/att, the GPS isolation is irrelevant.
>
> bst, oswald
>
> I. Sánchez Ciarrusta writes:
>
> > Hi all:
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you very much for your advices.
> >
> >
> >
> > I´m using 30A OPTO 30-450Hz frequency response ESCs.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have changed the gains, but in ATT mode the behaviour is not correct (it is not only due to the gains, because has an uncontrolable response) . Probably, like Oswal said, there is some fundamental thing working wrong, but I don´t know what: when I calibrate accelerometers and magnetometer seem to work well. When I command orders with RC the respose of the engines is correct.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In RATE mode, the behaviour is not as bad as ATT (the 4 engines work ok), but I can´t take off due to the instability.
> >
> >
> >
> > Maybe the vibrations are the problem, but I have the LisaM and the GPS isolated , but anyway I don´t know the message on telemetry to check if is ok.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have attached two captures of th rc signals and the comands in Rc, ATT and Rate mode.
> >
> >
> >
> > I really appreciate your advice and help: there are many things that can be failing and your experience can help me a lot. Perhaps I'm making a big mistake, but I think that all the steps I'm following are appropriate.
> >
> > Thank you very much:
> >
> >
> >
> > Inaki
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: address@hidden
> > To: address@hidden
> > Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 17:17:16 -0300
> > Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > BTW, are you using fast ESC (490hz + refresh rate capable ) ?
> > if yes, start your tests with:
> > P = 600;
> > I = 300;
> > D = 200;
> > DD = 0;
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:34:50 +0200
> > From: address@hidden
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft
> >
> > Hi,
> > As Eduardo recommended, did you check vibrations? Have a look at attitude angles and rates when running motors.
> > Then the pid values in example airframes should be a good starting point for tuning.
> > Regards
> > Loic
> >
> > Le 16 juil. 2014 11:43, "I. Sánchez Ciarrusta" <address@hidden> a écrit :
> >
> >
> >
> > New info:
> >
> > When I try Att mode, the behavior does not seem to follow any pattern. Two engines are on and the other two are off, and at random times the engines that were on stop working and vice versa.
> >
> > In RC mode, I have checked that the values ​​sent by the rc and the commands are the same, I don´t know if that is correct and if the commands are directly send to the engines or suffer any change.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Escribe texto o la dirección de un sitio web, o bien, traduce un documento.
> >
> > Cancelar
> > (I know fomr the documentation that :
> > Quizás quisiste decir: o si sufre alguna transformaciónppm input --(radio.xml)--> ppm_pulses[] --(radio.xml)--> radio_control.values[] --(rc_commands)--> commands[] --(command_laws,servos)--> actuators_pwm_values[] ppm out )
> >
> > Thanks again:
> >
> > Inaki
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: address@hidden
> > To: address@hidden
> > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:09:28 +0000
> > Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft
> >
> >
> > Hi:
> >
> > I am trying to fly my quadcopter in manual mode (RC or ATT).
> >
> > As is very unstable, it is almost impossible to take off from the ground. So to have more room for maneuver, I fastened with ropes to try to take off to a certain height from the ground.
> >
> > Following your advice I'm trying to modify the gains until it becomes stable.
> > However, I need your help because the nomenclature of the terms is not easy to understand.
> >
> > I do not know exactly what criteria to follow. I have thought about starting setting zero all the "i"s and "d"s, with low "p"s (changing from the GCS the values of the ​​tabs "Att Loop" and "Rate Loop", because I guess "Horiz Loop" and "Vert Loop" have only influence in autonomous modes ).
> >
> > My values are:
> >
> > Rate Loop:
> > pgain p400
> > pgain q 400
> > pgain r 350
> >
> > igain p 75
> > igain q 75
> > igain r 50
> >
> > ddgain p 300
> > ddgain q 300
> > ddgain r 300
> >
> >
> > Att Loop
> >
> > pgain phi 1000
> > dgain p 400
> > igain phi 200
> > ddgain p 300
> >
> > pgain theta 1000
> > dgain q 400
> > igain theta 200
> > ddgain q 300
> >
> > (and the same for yaw)
> >
> >
> > I have another question: I usually fly comercial quads, very stable ones. Comercial quad copters (with NO autopiltot) have some kind of help for the stability? Why the one I am using for paparazzi is so unstable (dji f450); i have to change smth in the code?
> >
> > Thank you very much in advance!!!
> >
> > Inaki
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: address@hidden
> > To: address@hidden
> > Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:50:12 +0000
> > Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft
> >
> >
> > Hi Alonso,
> > thanks for your answer.
> >
> > I will try that.
> >
> > What is the best way for testing if the autopilot acts to control the attitude? Maybe start with AP_MODE:ATTITDE_DIRECT and then pass to "HOVER" or CF mode?
> > Is there a standard procedure?
> >
> > Perhaps another problem is a bad vibration isolation of the board?
> >
> > Thanks again!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 22:56:44 -0600
> > From: address@hidden
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems with rotorcraft
> >
> >
> > maybe you should try the mode AP_MODE_ATTITUDE_DIRECT, in this mode it does not matter if the barometer works. It is ok to use one battery as long as you are giving the Lisa/M 5V . You will not get good performance without a barometer in automatic modes. If you have a Aspirin 2.2 then it does have a barometer. Try adding this <configure name="LISA_M_BARO" value="BARO_MS5611_SPI"/> after <target name="ap" board="lisa_m_2.0"> .
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:29 AM, I. Sánchez Ciarrusta <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I have recently tried to fly a quad (in + configuration) with paparazzi, and it was impossible to fly it.
> > It was really difficult to control, absolutelly unstable.
> > In addition, sometimes the PFD got “frozen” (and other times responded with delay), with no apparent reason.
> > We tried the hover mode, to observe if the autopilot actuated in every control, but nothing happened.
> >
> > We are using Paparazzi v5.1_devel, LisaM/v2 board with NO barometer, aspirin 2.2 IMU, and ublox LEA-5 GPS.
> > The accelerometers and magnetometers are well calibrated.
> >
> > Any advice is really appreciated.
> >
> > Maybe is a problem because of not having barometer? Maybe the autopilot and the motors have to be alimented with separate batteries? I saw some reported problems in the mailing list, but I don´t know exactly how related are with my problem.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Here is the airframe code we used:
> >
> > <!DOCTYPE airframe SYSTEM "../airframe.dtd">
> >
> >
> >
> > <airframe name="Quadrotor LisaM_2.0 pwm">
> >
> > <firmware name="rotorcraft">
> > <target name="ap" board="lisa_m_2.0">
> > <define name="NO_RC_THRUST_LIMIT"/>
> >
> > <configure name="AHRS_PROPAGATE_FREQUENCY" value="500"/>
> > </target>
> >
> > <target name="nps" board="pc">
> > <subsystem name="fdm" type="jsbsim"/>
> > <subsystem name="radio_control" type="ppm"/>
> > </target>
> >
> > <subsystem name="motor_mixing"/>
> > <subsystem name="actuators" type="pwm">
> > <define name="SERVO_HZ" value="400"/>
> >
> > </subsystem>
> >
> > <subsystem name="radio_control" type="ppm">
> > <configure name="RADIO_CONTROL_PPM_PIN" value="SERVO6"/>
> > </subsystem>
> >
> > <subsystem name="telemetry" type="transparent">
> > <configure name="MODEM_BAUD" value="B57600"/>
> > <configure name="MODEM_PORT" value="UART2"/>
> > </subsystem>
> >
> > <subsystem name="imu" type="aspirin_v2.2"/>
> >
> > <subsystem name="gps" type="ublox">
> > <configure name="GPS_PORT" value="UART3"/>
> > </subsystem>
> > <subsystem name="stabilization" type="int_quat"/>
> > <subsystem name="ahrs" type="int_cmpl_quat">
> > <define name="AHRS_GRAVITY_HEURISTIC_FACTOR" value="30"/>
> > </subsystem>
> > <subsystem name="ins"/>
> >
> > <!--define name="KILL_ON_GROUND_DETECT" value="TRUE"/-->
> > <define name="TELEMETRY_MODE_FBW" value="1" />
> > </firmware>
> >
> >
> > <modules main_freq="512">
> >
> > <load name="gps_ubx_ucenter.xml">
> > <define name="GPS_UBX_NAV5_DYNAMICS" value="NAV5_DYN_PEDESTRIAN"/>
> >
> > </load>
> > </modules>
> > <servos driver="Pwm">
> > <servo name="FRONT" no="0" min="1000" neutral="1100" max="1900"/>
> > <servo name="BACK" no="1" min="1000" neutral="1100" max="1900"/>
> > <servo name="RIGHT" no="2" min="1000" neutral="1100" max="1900"/>
> > <servo name="LEFT" no="3" min="1000" neutral="1100" max="1900"/>
> > </servos>
> >
> > <commands>
> > <axis name="ROLL" failsafe_value="0"/>
> > <axis name="PITCH" failsafe_value="0"/>
> > <axis name="YAW" failsafe_value="0"/>
> > <axis name="THRUST" failsafe_value="0"/>
> > </commands>
> >
> > <section name="MIXING" prefix="MOTOR_MIXING_">
> > <define name="TRIM_ROLL" value="0"/>
> > <define name="TRIM_PITCH" value="0"/>
> > <define name="TRIM_YAW" value="0"/>
> > <define name="NB_MOTOR" value="4"/>
> > <define name="SCALE" value="256"/>
> > <!-- front/back turning CW, right/left CCW -->
> > <define name="ROLL_COEF" value="{ 0, 0, -256, 256 }"/>
> > <define name="PITCH_COEF" value="{ 256, -256, 0, 0 }"/>
> > <define name="YAW_COEF" value="{ -256, -256, 256, 256 }"/>
> > <define name="THRUST_COEF" value="{ 256, 256, 256, 256 }"/>
> > </section>
> >
> > <command_laws>
> > <call fun="motor_mixing_run(autopilot_motors_on,FALSE,values)"/>
> > <set servo="FRONT" value="motor_mixing.commands[SERVO_FRONT]"/>
> > <set servo="BACK" value="motor_mixing.commands[SERVO_BACK]"/>
> > <set servo="RIGHT" value="motor_mixing.commands[SERVO_RIGHT]"/>
> > <set servo="LEFT" value="motor_mixing.commands[SERVO_LEFT]"/>
> > </command_laws>
> > <!-- inaki he puesto mis valores-->
> > <section name="IMU" prefix="IMU_">
> > <define name="ACCEL_X_NEUTRAL" value="24"/>
> > <define name="ACCEL_Y_NEUTRAL" value="8"/>
> > <define name="ACCEL_Z_NEUTRAL" value="264"/>
> > <define name="ACCEL_X_SENS" value="4.93314498567" integer="16"/>
> > <define name="ACCEL_Y_SENS" value="4.86671471234" integer="16"/>
> > <define name="ACCEL_Z_SENS" value="4.86346803582" integer="16"/>
> >
> > <!-- REEMPLAZADO POR MI CALIBRACION INAKI -->
> > <define name="MAG_X_NEUTRAL" value="8"/>
> > <define name="MAG_Y_NEUTRAL" value="-12"/>
> > <define name="MAG_Z_NEUTRAL" value="35"/>
> > <define name="MAG_X_SENS" value="3.53511175627" integer="16"/>
> > <define name="MAG_Y_SENS" value="3.49864611794" integer="16"/>
> > <define name="MAG_Z_SENS" value="3.96410626337" integer="16"/>
> >
> > <define name="BODY_TO_IMU_PHI" value="0." unit="deg"/>
> > <define name="BODY_TO_IMU_THETA" value="0." unit="deg"/>
> > <define name="BODY_TO_IMU_PSI" value="0." unit="deg"/>
> > </section>
> >
> > <section name="AHRS" prefix="AHRS_">
> > <define name="H_X" value="0.3770441"/>
> > <define name="H_Y" value="0.0193986"/>
> > <define name="H_Z" value="0.9259921"/>
> > </section>
> >
> > <section name="INS" prefix="INS_">
> > </section>
> >
> > <section name="STABILIZATION_RATE" prefix="STABILIZATION_RATE_">
> > <!-- setpoints -->
> > <define name="SP_MAX_P" value="10000"/>
> > <define name="SP_MAX_Q" value="10000"/>
> > <define name="SP_MAX_R" value="10000"/>
> > <define name="DEADBAND_P" value="20"/>
> > <define name="DEADBAND_Q" value="20"/>
> > <define name="DEADBAND_R" value="200"/>
> > <define name="REF_TAU" value="4"/>
> >
> > <!-- feedback -->
> > <define name="GAIN_P" value="400"/>
> > <define name="GAIN_Q" value="400"/>
> > <define name="GAIN_R" value="350"/>
> >
> > <define name="IGAIN_P" value="75"/>
> > <define name="IGAIN_Q" value="75"/>
> > <define name="IGAIN_R" value="50"/>
> >
> > <!-- feedforward -->
> > <define name="DDGAIN_P" value="300"/>
> > <define name="DDGAIN_Q" value="300"/>
> > <define name="DDGAIN_R" value="300"/>
> > </section>
> >
> >
> > <section name="STABILIZATION_ATTITUDE" prefix="STABILIZATION_ATTITUDE_">
> > <!-- setpoints -->
> > <define name="SP_MAX_PHI" value="45." unit="deg"/>
> > <define name="SP_MAX_THETA" value="45." unit="deg"/>
> > <define name="SP_MAX_R" value="90." unit="deg/s"/>
> > <define name="DEADBAND_A" value="0"/>
> > <define name="DEADBAND_E" value="0"/>
> > <define name="DEADBAND_R" value="250"/>
> >
> > <!-- reference -->
> > <define name="REF_OMEGA_P" value="400" unit="deg/s"/>
> > <define name="REF_ZETA_P" value="0.85"/>
> > <define name="REF_MAX_P" value="400." unit="deg/s"/>
> > <define name="REF_MAX_PDOT" value="RadOfDeg(8000.)"/>
> >
> > <define name="REF_OMEGA_Q" value="400" unit="deg/s"/>
> > <define name="REF_ZETA_Q" value="0.85"/>
> > <define name="REF_MAX_Q" value="400." unit="deg/s"/>
> > <define name="REF_MAX_QDOT" value="RadOfDeg(8000.)"/>
> >
> > <define name="REF_OMEGA_R" value="250" unit="deg/s"/>
> > <define name="REF_ZETA_R" value="0.85"/>
> > <define name="REF_MAX_R" value="180." unit="deg/s"/>
> > <define name="REF_MAX_RDOT" value="RadOfDeg(1800.)"/>
> >
> > <!-- feedback -->
> > <define name="PHI_PGAIN" value="1000"/>
> > <define name="PHI_DGAIN" value="400"/>
> > <define name="PHI_IGAIN" value="200"/>
> >
> > <define name="THETA_PGAIN" value="1000"/>
> > <define name="THETA_DGAIN" value="400"/>
> > <define name="THETA_IGAIN" value="200"/>
> >
> > <define name="PSI_PGAIN" value="500"/>
> > <define name="PSI_DGAIN" value="300"/>
> > <define name="PSI_IGAIN" value="10"/>
> >
> > <!-- feedforward -->
> > <define name="PHI_DDGAIN" value="300"/>
> > <define name="THETA_DDGAIN" value="300"/>
> > <define name="PSI_DDGAIN" value="300"/>
> > </section>
> >
> > <section name="GUIDANCE_V" prefix="GUIDANCE_V_">
> > <define name="MIN_ERR_Z" value="POS_BFP_OF_REAL(-10.)"/>
> > <define name="MAX_ERR_Z" value="POS_BFP_OF_REAL( 10.)"/>
> > <define name="MIN_ERR_ZD" value="SPEED_BFP_OF_REAL(-10.)"/>
> > <define name="MAX_ERR_ZD" value="SPEED_BFP_OF_REAL( 10.)"/>
> > <define name="MAX_SUM_ERR" value="2000000"/>
> > <define name="HOVER_KP" value="150"/>
> > <define name="HOVER_KD" value="80"/>
> > <define name="HOVER_KI" value="20"/>
> > <define name="NOMINAL_HOVER_THROTTLE" value="0.6"/>
> > <define name="ADAPT_THROTTLE_ENABLED" value="TRUE"/>
> > </section>
> >
> > <section name="GUIDANCE_H" prefix="GUIDANCE_H_">
> > <define name="MAX_BANK" value="20" unit="deg"/>
> > <define name="USE_SPEED_REF" value="TRUE"/>
> > <define name="PGAIN" value="50"/>
> > <define name="DGAIN" value="100"/>
> > <define name="AGAIN" value="100"/>
> > <define name="IGAIN" value="20"/>
> > </section>
> >
> > <section name="SIMULATOR" prefix="NPS_">
> > <define name="ACTUATOR_NAMES" value="{&quot;front_motor&quot;, &quot;back_motor&quot;, &quot;right_motor&quot;, &quot;left_motor&quot;}"/>
> > <define name="JSBSIM_INIT" value="&quot;reset00&quot;"/>
> > <define name="JSBSIM_MODEL" value="&quot;simple_quad&quot;"/>
> > <define name="SENSORS_PARAMS" value="&quot;nps_sensors_params_default.h&quot;"/>
> > <!-- mode switch on joystick channel 5 (axis numbering starting at zero) -->
> > <define name="JS_AXIS_MODE" value="4"/>
> > </section>
> >
> > <section name="AUTOPILOT">
> >
> > <define name="MODE_MANUAL" value="AP_MODE_KILL"/>
> > <define name="MODE_AUTO2" value="AP_MODE_NAV"/>
> > <define name="MODE_AUTO1" value="AP_MODE_RC_DIRECT"/>
> >
> > </section>
> >
> > <section name="BAT">
> > <define name="CATASTROPHIC_BAT_LEVEL" value="9.3" unit="V"/>
> > <define name="CRITIC_BAT_LEVEL" value="9.6" unit="V"/>
> > <define name="LOW_BAT_LEVEL" value="10.1" unit="V"/>
> > <define name="MAX_BAT_LEVEL" value="12.4" unit="V"/>
> > <define name="MILLIAMP_AT_FULL_THROTTLE" value="30000"/>
> > </section>
> >
> > </airframe>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]