paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Paparazzi Install on OSX Lion


From: Chris Wozny
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Paparazzi Install on OSX Lion
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:35:09 -0700

All,

I just tried the install on another installation of OSX Lion and it
worked without a hitch. I guess I'll stick with this one for now and
then wipe my MacPorts on the other one when I get a chance. Bizarre
issue, but at least it's (slightly) documented now.

- Chris

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Chris Wozny <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bernie,
>
> You were right about root owning the glade file. I removed it and ran
> make again and it complained about the 64-bit arch:
>
> ld: can't write output file: ./dllmultimon.so for architecture x86_64
> clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see 
> invocation)
> make[1]: *** [multimon.cma] Error 2
> make: *** [multimon] Error 2
>
> - Woz
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:04 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>> There is a difference between modifying the directory and writing the the
>> directory.
>> All you want to do is write to the directory.
>>
>> Make sure that you don't have any problems writing to the /tmp/* files.
>> i.e. /tmp/paparazzi.glade may exist and be owned by root from the "sudo make"
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>> Bernie,
>>>
>>> The permissions don't seem to be the issue since after adding write
>>> permission to user didn't fix it. I searched for what the 't' was and
>>> this is what came up:
>>>
>>> "The ‘d’ stands for directory, for normal files this will be a ‘-’.
>>> Next we have the 3 permissions for owning user (root) ‘rwx’, then the
>>> 3 for group (root) ‘rwx’ and then the 3 for other users ‘rwt’. So root
>>> and owner have full permissions (in this case the owner is also root)
>>> but all other users have almost full permissions but cannot modify the
>>> directory itself."
>>>
>>> So apparently users can't modify that directory...
>>>
>>> It's strange that no one on OSX has seen this issue before since I
>>> think all OSX users will see the RWT permission.
>>>
>>> - Woz
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:35 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> So I'm guessing from that lack of write permissions to /tmp that
>>>> something
>>>> isn't quite right with the permissions on your Mac...
>>>> I'd run disk utility and check the and fix the permissions as this
>>>> "should" fix the permissions on /tmp to make the directory 0777
>>>> (Actually you'll find that /tmp is a sum link to /private/tmp and this
>>>> directory is the one with the permissions problem.
>>>> ls -la /private/
>>>> ...
>>>> drwxrwxrwt   17 root  wheel   578 22 Feb 12:29 tmp
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> If Disk Utility doesn't fix it then a good old "sudo chmod 0777
>>>> /private/tmp" should do the trick.
>>>> I'm not sure what the t is on the end of the permissions so maybe "sudo
>>>> chmod a+wrx /private/tmp" might be better???
>>>>
>>>> You shouldn't have any problems building or running paparazzi as a non
>>>> root user.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Bernie.
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Bernard,
>>>>>
>>>>> That did indeed solve that issue, but it uncovered a new one. Now I've
>>>>> got permission errors when trying to make paparazzi:
>>>>>
>>>>> ld: warning: -read_only_relocs cannot be used with x86_64
>>>>> cd sw/supervision; make PAPARAZZI_SRC=/Users/cwozny/paparazzi
>>>>> PAPARAZZI_HOME=/Users/cwozny/paparazzi
>>>>> ocamldep -I ../lib/ocaml *.ml* > .depend
>>>>> grep -v invisible_char paparazzicenter.glade >
>>>>> /tmp/paparazzicenter.glade
>>>>> /bin/sh: /tmp/paparazzicenter.glade: Permission denied
>>>>> make[1]: *** [gtk_pc.ml] Error 1
>>>>> make: *** [center] Error 2
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you seen this before? I then sudo made paparazzi and sudo ran
>>>>> paparazzi and everything seems to work, but I'd rather not give
>>>>> paparazzi su access everytime I have to use it ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> - Chris
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM,  <address@hidden>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't ever seen this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When encountering errors of any kind when building my plan of attack
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> always
>>>>>> 1) make clean
>>>>>> 2) git pull origin <branch>
>>>>>> 3) make
>>>>>> 4) whatever I was trying to do before...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This usually fixes the problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I was building MacPorts I used to also make the approach
>>>>>> 1) make clean
>>>>>> 2) sudo port selfupdate
>>>>>> 3) sudo port upgrade outdated
>>>>>> 4) git pull origin <branch>
>>>>>> 5) make
>>>>>> 6) whatever I was trying to do before...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sometimes however step three would spew heaps of errors and so step 3
>>>>>> would become
>>>>>> 3a) sudo port -f uninstall installed
>>>>>> 3b) sudo port clean --all uninstalled
>>>>>> 3c) sudo port install paparazzi-tools
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now however I just take the binary build as its a much quicker process
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> more stable as I don't have to worry about the moving target that
>>>>>> MacPorts
>>>>>> is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Bernie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have any of the OSX users run into this situation when trying to
>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>> from source on OSX?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ make
>>>>>>> cd data/maps; make PAPARAZZI_SRC=/Users/cwozny/paparazzi
>>>>>>> PAPARAZZI_HOME=/Users/cwozny/paparazzi
>>>>>>> DOWNLOAD: google maps version code
>>>>>>> if test ! -e conf/maps.xml; then cp conf/maps.xml.example
>>>>>>> conf/maps.xml;
>>>>>>> fi
>>>>>>> cd sw/lib/ocaml; make PAPARAZZI_SRC=/Users/cwozny/paparazzi
>>>>>>> PAPARAZZI_HOME=/Users/cwozny/paparazzi
>>>>>>> OC fig.ml
>>>>>>> File "fig.ml", line 1, characters 0-1:
>>>>>>> Error: Could not find the .cmi file for interface fig.mli.
>>>>>>> make[1]: *** [fig.cmo] Error 2
>>>>>>> make: *** [lib] Error 2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's looking for a .cmi file related to fig.mli. I've installed
>>>>>>> paparazzi-tools and have pulled the dev branch from git. The only
>>>>>>> related topic on the mailing list was someone installing on Ubuntu,
>>>>>>> but that was two years ago and was said to be rectified in later
>>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Chris



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]