[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Paparazzi-devel] reply to: Re: a way to measuretime?(gisela.noci)
From: |
gisela.noci |
Subject: |
RE: [Paparazzi-devel] reply to: Re: a way to measuretime?(gisela.noci) |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:27:17 +0200 |
He (or She) who does 'it' is the next Bill Gates....
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden
] On Behalf Of address@hidden
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:50 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [Paparazzi-devel] reply to: Re: a way to
measuretime?(gisela.noci)
Perhaps there should be a competition. The one who finds the simplest,
lightest, least power/volume consuming solution gets a free beer!
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On
Behalf Of gisela.noci
Sent: Friday, 13 November 2009 2:43 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [Paparazzi-devel] reply to: Re: a way to measure
time?(gisela.noci)
Great Chris,
I am keen to hear how it goes. This is all far to much fun for one
person, so the more trying this the merrier!
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From:
address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden
.org
] On Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:18 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] reply to: Re: a way to measure time?
(gisela.noci)
Hi Joe.
I understand what you are saying and i am prepared for a failure but if
it works acceptably well i will be very pleased to say the least...
My planes land with 4 to 6 m/s max (Easyglider or big high wing planes)
so i guess i have a chance making it work.
I also have used the paparazzi in a turbine (P80) plane with landing
speed of about 10m/s but i wouldn't try to auto land it as any crash
will start a fire. I just used the paparazzi system as a safety feature
Anyway i will try the MAXSONAR just for fun and experience.
At first i will go the easy and simple way just to gather some data and
then if this thing work acceptably well i will start developing it.
For now the sensor will feed the height to the Kalman filter instead of
the GPS when the altitude is below 5m just like a barometer would.
Chris
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel