Pascal,
I looked at this control law, and frankly I was scared. This law
commands 0 rate, while I would call it simpler, it has to be inferior
to the old style of nested loops. This should be stated somewhere. I
also dont understand why it is highly recommended, as it appears to be
a hacked way to do control laws.
AJ
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] New variable name?
From: Pascal Brisset <address@hidden>
Date: Wed, May 07, 2008 9:59 am
To: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
Hi,
it is not only a new name, it is a new, simpler if you use a gyro,
control loop.
It is highly recommended to move to this new code, just defining this
ROLL_ATTITUDE_GAIN macro (fw_h_ctl.c:228).
Yes, you can keep your 5000 absolute value and just change the sign.
--Pascal
Daniel Morgan wrote:
> Has the roll_pgain variable in the airframe file been changed to
> ROLL_ATTITUDE_GAIN" value="-7500"? Also if it has been changed as i
> suspect why has it now become a negative value... Also if i used a
> 5000 value for my roll_pgain would my ROLL_ATTITUDE_GAIN = -5000 ?
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden <#Compose>
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden <#Compose>
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel