RE: [Paparazzi-devel] New variable name?

[akochevar]

Pascal,

I looked at this control law, and frankly I was scared.  This law commands 0 rate, while I would call it simpler, it has to be inferior to the old style of nested loops.  This should be stated somewhere.  I also dont understand why it is highly recommended, as it appears to be a hacked way to do control laws.

 

AJ

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] New variable name?
> From: Pascal Brisset <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, May 07, 2008 9:59 am
> To: address@hidden
>
> Hi,
>
> it is not only a new name, it is a new, simpler if you use a gyro, 
> control loop.
> It is highly recommended to move to this new code, just defining this 
> ROLL_ATTITUDE_GAIN macro (fw_h_ctl.c:228).
> Yes, you can keep your 5000 absolute value and just change the sign.
>
> --Pascal
>
> Daniel Morgan wrote:
> > Has the roll_pgain variable in the airframe file been changed to 
> > ROLL_ATTITUDE_GAIN" value="-7500"? Also if it has been changed as i 
> > suspect why has it now become a negative value... Also if i used a 
> > 5000 value for my roll_pgain would my ROLL_ATTITUDE_GAIN = -5000 ?
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > Paparazzi-devel@nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> > 
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> Paparazzi-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel